|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: they were only pebbles
... And the bad guys shot at them-- Bam Bam!
But what I want to know is Wilma local video store have a copy oF Red 2 for me to rent, tonight?
If not, they're in for a Barney, you can Bettya!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I just watched the first RED the other night. Excellent film - I laughed and laughed and laughed.
|
|
|
|
|
Great cast, great script, great story, and don't let Willis have control of anything whatsoever -- you can't lose.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: But what I want to know is Wilma local video store have a copy oF Red 2 for me to rent, tonight?
I'm aFred they might not... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience
Greg King
-----
I always wanted to be somebody, but now I realize I should have been more specific.
Lily Tomlin, Actress
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder how many people are humming the Flintstones theme, right about now.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
ChrisElston wrote: But....
Perhaps you might find more happiness watching documentaries since they tend to be quite realistic.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, I've seen the film. Having read the book, I was waiting for them to do the reveal on the sniper issue (I'm not going to give either part away so as not to spoil it for others). They totally borked that.
Yup - the fight scene outside the bar was the most farcical part of it all - you can imagine a 250lb 6 foot 5er carrying it off. Cruise ---- well no. The disturbing thing is that they've already said they are going to do other Reacher movies.
Oh, and as for the Zec. They completely avoided the whole "hideous disfigurement" aspect from the book.
|
|
|
|
|
It's standard hollywood fare - a bit predictable, written to not offend many people (and make a shed load of dosh). Take your brain out, and it's not too bad. Watch it with a glass or two and you can ignore Cruise as well. 
That it was released only a year ago and it is already down to £7 at ASDA pretty much sums it up...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you regarding Tom Cruise. But overall it was a good movie.
IMO the whole Jack Reacher book series is more suitable for a TV Show than a Movie. If Tom Cruise was not attached to the project, no one will go in a theater to see the movie, because it was neither groundbreaking or a blockbuster material in the first place.
I enjoyed reading the novels (even if they are poorly written), but I still believe it's more suitable for a 10 Season TV Show (like 24).
|
|
|
|
|
Agree totally but couldn't have put it into words aswell as you have.
I haven't read this particular book, but have recently become a Reacher fan and read a few others.
The only thing I would say in the defence of the writers/director that there are so many twists in the books it must be extremely difficult to convey into a film.
The Tom Cruise bit still winds me up, if I remember rightly Lee Child said that Reacher being written as big was just a reference to his presence and as Tom Cruise has a presence it doesn't matter. Which is bollox.
|
|
|
|
|
PB 369,783 wrote: if I remember rightly Lee Child said that Reacher being written as big was just a reference to his presence and as Tom Cruise has a presence it doesn't matter. Which is bollox.
Lee Child (if that is his real name, which it isn't) is a little odd as a writer, he had a long and successful career in TV in the UK before being made redundant and getting the hump about it. He then decided to be an author and set about working out how to write the most commercially viable books.
Hence his decision to create the American Jack Reacher and set all his books in the world's biggest market. He then decided to give Reacher a French mother so that readers in European countries that are not totally enamoured by Americans wouldn't be put off reading the books.
He has made decisions and choices based purely on commercial reasons, not artistic ones. Right from the start of his writing career.
Which is fair enough, his ideas, his income, he can do and say what he wants about it.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
I have a phone interview this afternoon for a job. They're a good well known company and I think my skills are what they're looking for. The job is reasonably local, a 20 minute, and offers flexible hours.
What I don't like is this tendency to have big interviews by phone because you can't fully judge the other person[s] reaction. Both from their perspective and mine, the body language is lost and so only the voice can give a clue of the under currents. Don't misunderstand me, having a 20 minute call to check suitability is fine, but then I really think the interviews should be face to face. In this case one interviewer is overseas, but Shirley I could go and have the interview with one at their office and have the other call in.
Anyway, I am diligently researching their product line and trying to read between the lines on the job specification. Fun, fun, fun.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't do it - just too unprofessional. I figure if they can't do it face to face they don't need me.
Peter Wasser
Art is making something out of nothing and selling it.
Frank Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto. I'm a coder, not trained in using a telephone. Don't even own one.
Anything that can be asked over the phone can be done using email - that way you don't interrupt me, and I can reply when it suits me.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure about your case but what I have seen so far with phone interviews is , If one sounds technically good , the interviewer will look forward to have a face to face round and that will be scheduled next. No company would like to spend time in face to face discussion unless they get pleased in phone interview.
Thanks,
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
I fully understand the time and cost perspective, but my gripe is that the phone-interviews are getting longer and more in-depth. I think they should use the phone call to make the decision if the candidate is suitable, and then a face-to-face to decide on the personality fit.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
|
Yep you are right.. the phone interview should be short not more than 30min to understand the candidate and see whether she/he gets suited for their requirement.
Thanks,
Ranjan.D
|
|
|
|
|
Ranjan.D wrote: short not more than 30min
Should be, but often isn't. One agency arranged one for me that took about 90 minutes on the dog-and-bone and I was only 15km from the office. Why the goons didn't tell me to go there I don't know. After the interview the pratt wanted to see some code samples so I sent some. I didn't get the job so I emailed the firm asking them to please delete them. The agency called me back saying the firm was not impressed with the email. It wasn't unreasonable as the code samples did have IP value so it was reasonable they shouldn't benefit from my time spent on them.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
I seemed to get lots of phone interviews with agency's then the absolute best was an interview I did for a big name agency one day (Love Mondays...) (turned up booted & suited!) and when I called back later I found the goon interviewing me had left and thrown all his documentation away. Talk about professional.... 
|
|
|
|
|
That is what it is for the most part in my experience.
StringBuilder - tick.
Garbage Collection - tick.
IDisposable - tick.
Value vs. Reference type - tick.
Wow, you really know your stuff let's do a face to face.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
This is as a deelopment/project mananger, So it'll be "Sprint, Burndown, Backlog, Review" - "Wow! You really know Agile!"
Bow locks.
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Philpott wrote: Value vs. Reference type - tick.
And then ask about pass-by-reference 
|
|
|
|
|
Ranjan.D wrote: No company would like to spend time in face to face discussion unless they get pleased in phone interview.
I've worked for more than five companies, in over ten years. Never, never did I do a telephone interview.
Ranjan.D wrote: If one sounds technically good , the interviewer will look forward to have a face to face round and that will be scheduled next.
Aw, fes, that simply means that the interviewer didn't prepare, didn't do his homework - and that's where the interview ends.
If he did his homework, he would know whether or not it'd be worth the time to do a f2f-conversation. Not only is there a resume and previous work that can be judged, but his work is even easier nowadays thanks to internet.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I did one of those about two years ago. After it finished, I did some further research on the firm and came across a photo of one of the directors who according to the firms website describes him "as the legendary programmer". I'm glad it was by phone because when I saw his photo I couldn't help but laugh so a one-to-one might have distracted me. He was, to use the acronym some doctor's have used in their patient's notes, an FLK (Funny Looking Kid).
Good luck on yours. Why would you want to take Shirley to the interview? 
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
For the last two positions I've held, both were obtained with phone interviews.
The first one, I was living in Canada, position was in the U.S. - two hour interview; one hour with developers at the site; one hour with the recruiting firm. Stayed at that position for almost 13 years.
Current position, 30 minute interview (company was local to me so it could have been onsite, but phone suited all of our needs). Interview was technical in nature: in depth knowledge of the product suite to be used. Have been here for almost 2 years.
So, they can have value and have worked well for me.
Tim
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
