|
I think it is in the <memory> header file, but it is also defined within the std namespace.
If you repost your error message, take not that codeproject thinks that everything between angle brackets is an HTML tag, and so does not display it. You should use < and >
Dave
http://www.cloudsofheaven.org
|
|
|
|
|
previous time I have tried :
typedef auto_ptr < CString > str;
and again I have tried the following one :
typedef std::auto_ptr < CString > str;
but both are not working and giving error
Chintan
C.R.Naik
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both are unable to solve the problem.
C.R.Naik
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it might be useful to explain a little
more of the reason why auto_ptr was included in
the standard. (There was a great deal of haggling
about this and other types of pointer wrappers,
and there are a number of other pointer wrappers
in boost (boost.org) that will almost certainly
make it into the next version of the standard.)
The reason why auto_ptr is important relates to
exceptions. Consider this:
class excep { /* some exception class */};
void g()
{
try { f(); }
catch(excep &e)
{ handle(e); }
}
void f()
{
int* a = new int;
*a = might_throw_excep();
other_fn();
delete a;
};
Now consider what happens if might_throw_excep throws
an exception. In that case, the stack unwinds to
the nearest matching catch statement (in g), but that
means that a, which is now out of scope, points to
heap allocated memory that will never be deleted.
auto_ptr solves this problem, by rewriting f() as the
following:
void f()
{
auto_ptr<int> a = new int;
*a = might_throw_excep();
other_fn();
}
In this case, the destructor of a (which is an auto_ptr
template class) is called when it goes out of scope. This
causes the object a to be deleted. However, what is more
important is this: even if might_throw_excep throws, then
as part of the exception processing system, the destructors
of the classes are called as the stack is unwound to the
catch statement. This happens even though other_fn is not
called. That means that, even if an exception is
thrown, a's destructor is called, and it doesn't leak
memory.
For that reason, auto_ptr (or something like it) is
necessary to write leak free code in the presence of
exceptions. This is the motivation, AFAIK, behind why
auto_ptr was added to the standard.
HTH.
|
|
|
|
|
I am compiling something, however I get this error:
--------------------Configuration: encrypt - Win32 Debug--------------------<br />
Compiling...<br />
encrypt.cpp<br />
c:\program files\microsoft sdk\include\wincrypt.h(37) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 'HRESULT'<br />
c:\program files\microsoft sdk\include\wincrypt.h(37) : fatal error C1004: unexpected end of file found<br />
Error executing cl.exe.<br />
<br />
encrypt.obj - 2 error(s), 0 warning(s)
and it takes me to this point in the wincrypt.h file (pointing at the red section):
#ifndef _HRESULT_DEFINED
#define _HRESULT_DEFINED
<font color="red">typedef LONG HRESULT;</font>
#endif // !_HRESULT_DEFINED
Does anyone have any clues?
-Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
are proper headers included before #include "wincrypt.h"? i think you should include "wtypes.h" in front of #include "wincrypt.h". or "stdafx.h" if your project has it
|
|
|
|
|
Zed wrote:
in front of #include "wincrypt.h". or "stdafx.h" if your project has it
Never ever include something in front of "stdafx.h"!
It is ignored after the preparation of the precompiled headers.
Either include in "stdafx.h" or after "stdafx.h".
My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
|
|
|
|
|
yes, i know that.
what i meant was: include wtypes.h in front of wincrypt.h, or stdafx.h in front of wincrypt.h.
sorry for misunderstanding
|
|
|
|
|
That worked, thanks.
-Nick Parker
|
|
|
|
|
After converted the application from VC++ to .NET C++, I want to add a resource to the project. From the Project menu, I selected Add Resource. An error message popped up: error RC2135: file not found: MENU
I clicked OK and got another one: error RC2135: file not found: POPUP
What should I fix?
-Elizabeth
Eilzabeth
|
|
|
|
|
I have just converted an application from VC++6 to .NET C++. But I can not find the Dialog resource from the CDialog drived class in .NET. In VC++, I can get to the dialog resource from the Wizard Bar easily be scrolling down the member list. Where can I find it?
-Elizabeth
Eilzabeth
|
|
|
|
|
Hi I am trying to write data to the serial port using the windows api. I can write successfully by using a normal C style string with the MFC wrapper I wrote(with help from this site!) it goes something like this
void CSerComPort::WriteData(char* cData,DWORD dwBufferSize)
{
DWORD dwBytesWritten;
if(!WriteFile(m_ComPortHndl,cData,dwBufferSize,&dwBytesWritten,NULL))
; //throw exception for wrong write
else;// ASSERT(dwBytesWritten == sizeof(dwData));
}
works fine when i declare something like
char dwdata[]="test string";
But Ideally i would like to read data in from an edit box and this variable is of type CString, I have tried to use the member function GetBuffer which seems to be ok but when I pass GetLength as the second parameter it says I can't convert between int and unsigned long. Is there a standard way to do this, or would I be better rewriting the WriteData function? Please bear with me I am quite new to windows programming but I would like to know if there is a standard way to achieve this. Thanks
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
// I am asuming no UNICODE is involved.
// This should work, since LPTSTR is defined as char*
CString csData;
GetDlgItemText(IDC_TEXTSTRING, csData);
WriteData( LPCTSTR(csData),(DWORD)csData.GetLength() );
// Here are some more options
// If using C
char szBuffer[512];
int nLen = GetDlgItemText(hDlg, IDC_TEXTSTRING, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer));
WriteData( szBuffer,(DWORD)nLen );
// If using MFC
int nLen = GetDlgItemText(IDC_TEXTSTRING, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer));
WriteData( szBuffer,(DWORD)nLen );
// Else If using MFCs CString
CString csData;
GetDlgItemText(IDC_TEXTSTRING, csData);
// Then
WriteData( LPCTSTR(csData),(DWORD)csData.GetLength() );
// or
const char* pszData = csData.GetBuffer(csData.GetLength());
WriteData( pszData ,(DWORD)csData.GetLength() );
csData.ReleaseBuffer();
// or
WriteData( csData.LockBuffer(),(DWORD)csData.GetLength() );
csData.UnlockBuffer();
Trust in the code Luke. Yea right!
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion from CString to char* is simple.
For example,
CString str = "test string;
then you should write
WriteFile(m_ComPortHndl,(char*)(LPCTSTR) str, str.GetLength(), &dwBytesWritten,NULL)
C.R.Naik
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the help guys, I appreciate it
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
i wrote a html control that is hosted in an html page (in an explorer bar). how do i get the address of the page that's hosted in that main internet explorer?
thanks
melinda
|
|
|
|
|
It would be helpful to show the route I've been taking:
CComPtr<idispatch> spDisp;
hr = m_spBrowser->get_Document( &spDisp );
CComPtr<ihtmldocument2> spDoc2;
hr = spDisp->QueryInterface( &spDoc2 );
CComPtr<ihtmlwindow2> spWindow;
hr = spDoc2->get_parentWindow( &spWindow );
spDoc2 = NULL;
spWindow->get_document( &spDoc2 );
CComBSTR bstrParentUrl;
spDoc2->get_URL( &bstrParentUrl );
In bstrParentUrl I get a bizarre value like "res//C:\DOCUMEN~1\...." I've tried many other approaches and either get an empty string or this value.
Thanks
Melinda.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so I have this application with some modless dialogs here and there. I want to catch when the user presses Ctrl-Z, Ctrl+Y, etc. from whatever modeless dialog may be active. How can I accomplish this? Any suggestions?
[edit] I guess what I really want is to create a message handler for a keyboard shortcut. [/edit]
- Nitron
"Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Look up "Keyboard Accelerators" in MSDN. I don't know if it will help you, since you have all those dialog boxes, but it's a start.
Regards,
Alvaro
When birds fly in the right formation, they need only exert half the effort. Even in nature, teamwork results in collective laziness. -- despair.com
|
|
|
|
|
yea, that's what im playing with now. 
- Nitron
"Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
A "global catcher" can be implemented only either in the Main message loop (MFC provides CWinApp::PreTranslateMessage for that), or, if you don#t have access to such a mechanism, by a windows hook.
(Hooks should be used only if absolutely necessary, though)
The Typical message loop looks like this:
while (GetMessage(&msg,...))
{
TranslateMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage();
}
the MFC message loop looks (more or less) like this:
while (GetMessage())
{
if (!PreTranslateMessage(msg)) {
TranslataeMessage(&msg);
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
}
You can implement a similar method if you're not using MFC.
Italian is a beautiful language. amare means to love, and amara bitter.
sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen
|
|
|
|
|
Another solution is TranslateAccelerator().
HACCEL hSomeAcc = ::LoadAccelerators(AfxGetInstanceHandle(),
MAKEINTRESOURCE(IDR_SOME_ACCELERATOR));
PreTranslateMessage()
{
...
if(::TranslateAccelerator(m_hWnd, hSomeAcc, pMsg))
return(TRUE);
...
return FALSE;
}
Kuphryn
|
|
|
|
|
sweet! I was looking into this before I left for the day. I will try it tomorrow. Thanx! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
- Nitron
"Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
