|
In the future... let's make sure to zap the account first. It's hard to report someone as a spammer when you have no reference (i.e. the post went away first).
|
|
|
|
|
I just whacked him. The 7th report seemed to do it 
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if reporting user is needed. I have seen him oft and he usually behaves correctly. I would go for telling him about the "error" as a warning first and give him a second chance.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, this is not a commercial spam or something, this is another sample of such behavior.
This person:
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/EmiliAlice[^].
All the "solutions" are posted in response to own questions, and many were self-accepted formally. What you can see is after I already removed some. My warnings about this behavior does not help.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Message[^]
Luser Gone.
Bob Dole The internet is a great way to get on the net.
 2.0.82.7292 SP6a
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure your link is correct?
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
It was. I nuked the message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you had read my response, and Pete's to me, you would have the answer.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Usually after a message is removed from the forum, if someone tries to open that message it would say "Message removed". The strange thing here is the OP's link is pointing to a valid article after the message has been nuked. Don't you think its incorrect. Someone might accidentally report that article as spam without looking at it. What do you think ?
|
|
|
|
|
No, the article is obviously not spam, which is why I queried it with Zac, and Pete explained what had happened. And if you look closely at the link it contains a #tag pointing to a message, which has obviously been removed.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Again?
I think this is the 7th time (but I could be wrong) that the live stream spammer recreated his account. I think it's necessary to block his IP-address.
ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
He has recreated his account 4 times today. Three of them reported in this[^] post. This member has created more than 10 spams in QA forum in last 24 hours.
ProgramFOX wrote: I think it's necessary to block his IP-address.
Effective solution if the problem continues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posts removed, the perpetrators still need some work!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone now, just as the accounts too!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
