|
The process is complete. Soon they will appear as published and as Technical Blog entries.
The only catch is you won't be able to edit your blog entries until the bug fix is deployed. Our apologies.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll have to do the same thing. Switch it over to an article, then back again to a Technical Blog entry. I have made it to an article for the first step. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was trying to update one of my article now but when I hit Publish after a little while it throws me this following exception,
We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
Ticket: 5345003
Server: Web02
|
|
|
|
|
Mohammad A Rahman wrote: We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Well, this explains it all.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011)
"But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)
|
|
|
|
|
That's message got from the submission wizard though. But I would guess there would be a solution for this.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mohammad A Rahman,
Thanks for reporting.
This is a bug, and I will fix it immediately. But it will be available after next deploy only. For now, as a work around, can you please add some notes (there is a new box for notes on what has been changed) at the bottom of the wizard and then hit Publish.
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
The download source code link on my article 'DataGridView Event Sequences' appears to be broken.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
It is all good now.
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed and I am sure others have noticed too, that there are many questioners that ask a question and all others take efforts to reply to their question or atleast give some direction.
But most of the Questioners never get back with what solved their problem or atleast mark a solution as Answer.
This site is all about re usability. This will only help others before posting a new question as they will mostly have a solution for their issue.
Thanks
Maz
Maz
|
|
|
|
|
Totally agree. Any suggestions?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
upload viruses to people who don't mark it answered?
If it moves, compile it
|
|
|
|
|
Um. No.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It's ironic that the OP hasn't followed up.
|
|
|
|
|
Whats OP? And no suggestions as such yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Original Poster
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
We're still waiting for your suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
I think deducting a few points around (5 points) for every answer that they DIDNT respond to. Atleast questioners should add a note whether they even tried it or not.
OR
Blocking them from posting new questions in the forum unless they have attended to the ones already asked by them.
|
|
|
|
|
ShaikhM wrote: Blocking them from posting new questions in the forum unless they have attended
to the ones already asked by them.
I think it is not a bad idea but, on the other hand, it don't think it is that easy. Some thoughts about:
Many of the users that just throw the question and give no further feedback or comment or whatever are user that just don't come back. So that limit would not really bring a solution.
Now just the opposite, imagine questions made by "good" users that are not so easy and there are answers giving a guess or pointing out an idea, but none of the answers is really a solution. Then that users could have problems with that limit. Result... questions being marked as "solved" that doesn't really have a valid solution.
Or questions that are not answered by anyone, maybe because the tags are not set properly or whatever, then the lack of answers would be a problem for that user as well.
With a limit of (let's say 5, 10 or 15) questions without solution could do the trick without giving problems for a while to average users, but still giving the chance for random users to do the same as they are currently doing.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ya makes sense in what you say. But a user that has built his reputation would rarely leave the question without following up. It is just the one timers that create this issue, resulting in heaps of multiple questions surrounding the same topic.
And as for this point "questions being marked as "solved" that doesn't really have a valid solution." I think it is not necessary to mark the solution as an answer, what i am talking about is atleast leave a note whether that solution was even tried or not. And if tried what happened. Leave it at that.
That will stop "one part" of the one timers from posting new questions as they might have already tried the solution that had a comment left on it.
Thanks
Maz
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, you meant have any interaction in the answers part, not marking it as "solved".
I personally find it a good idea. Let's see what the admins say, if it is realistic or not.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Are we meant to get last Thurday's newsletter again, or did someone press the wrong button?
Hamsterburger now on special? 
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Something went wrong, but we're still looking into precisely what. Our apologies. We will discover the secrets of the hamsterburger mystery meat.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
