|
i dont like critisizing the people that is the reason i said like that
if i know the answer sure i will give i expect other people also
|
|
|
|
|
 Man, you should have posted your code in code block like below.
process = Process.Start(psi);
process.WaitForExit(executionTimeOutSecs * 1000);
if (!process.HasExited)
{
StringBuilder text = new StringBuilder();
text.AppendFormat("Having to kill {0}, executed longer than timeout value, {1} sec.", taskName,
executionTimeOutSecs);
if (logging)
{
log.writeLogFile(text.ToString());
}
log.writeEventLogWarning(text.ToString());
process.Kill();
process.WaitForExit(1000);
}
process.Close();
But you posted the same un-formatted code in new message which is ugly one & against the rule. BTW He suggested you the same in his message like what I did now.
|
|
|
|
|
sorry really i dont know how to do all these things just i got the problem i posted
|
|
|
|
|
pprasanthk wrote: Here i am getting "hasexited" false my process not exited in given time how to
handle this
Depends on what you need.
You can wait longer or kill the process.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly but client is doing process.kill in process.hasexited condition
is there any way to wait for exit other than calling oveloaded of process.waitforexit()
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand that response.
Rephrasing what I said before...
Given that you have a process X.
If you are waiting for it to complete your choices are to continue to wait or kill it.
A variation on that it to modify X such that you can send a command to it that causes it to terminate itself. That however isn't really a solution because after you do that you are still left with the solution above to either wait or kill it.
There are no other options.
This of course presumes that you understand that you could just continue to wait by looping on the has exited value.
|
|
|
|
|
how to get the time sheet management project in windows application?
|
|
|
|
|
1. Purchase any existing product.
2. Pay someone to write it for you.
3. Write it yourself.
4. Search web for freely available products.
"The worst code you'll come across is code you wrote last year.", wizardzz[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Check this CodeProjectForums .com
|
|
|
|
|
This question is asked so often that Microsoft made a starter kit[^], and they got an article on extending that starter kit here[^].
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody know how to create Paging facility in ASP CheckboxList ?????
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think CheckBoxList supports paging. It is a simple control intended to help users make multiple selections. If the list is too long, try putting it in a DIV with overflow set to auto.
Alternatively, you can try using a GridView with a template column for the checkbox.
|
|
|
|
|
how to combine two dataset to one xml file
and how to read this after ?
i have this:
dsView1 = new DataSet("1");
SQL = "SELECT * FROM ConfTbl";
adp = new OleDbDataAdapter(SQL, Conn);
adp.Fill(dsView1, "ConfTbl");
adp.Dispose();
dsView2 = new DataSet("2");
SQL = "SELECT * FROM DipTbl";
adp = new OleDbDataAdapter(SQL, Conn);
adp.Fill(dsView2, "ConfTbl");
adp.Dispose();
dsView.WriteXml(@"d:\Test.xml");
how to combine dsView1 and dsView2 to one dataset, that i have table[0] and table[1]
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a few lab domains that are not trusted with our primary domains, but through the IP or FQDN, I can still map from the non trusted domains with proper credentials.
My problem is that when I run a sessionmanager program I want, it fails when trying to query the hostname from the IP ... which it cannot do because of the broken trust.
I'm having trouble writing error checking for this so I can skip this part of the code, if the return value comes back as a socket error of "no such host found", does anyone have any ideas on how to code for this return value. An example of it failing would be
MessageBox.Show(Dns.GetHostEntry(session["ComputerName"].ToString()).HostName);
will give a return value of "No such host found" and also cause the program to bomb. Any help would be appreciated, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Will this work?
string hostName = "No host found";
try {
IPHostEntry entry = Dns.GetHostEntry(session["ComputerName"].ToString());
if (entry != null) {
hostName = entry.HostName;
}
} catch (Exception e) {
}
modified on Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thank you for the reply. That did work although the catch from your snippet still has "No such host found" and then it just continues on through the code. I've never done that before, but as long as that is ok I'm happy! 
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
turbosupramk3 wrote: That did work although the catch from your snippet still has "No such host found" and then it just continues on through the code.
I did it on purpose. The only executable code within the try block is the call to the GetHostEntry method. If the method throws an exception, it still means that the host was not found.
|
|
|
|
|
Great, I will use this technique from now on
Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of those few cases where an empty catch is (at least arguably) appropriate. In general, anything where you're trying to look things up through an external service (in this case, DNS) and the default option is 'failure to find X', it's ok to do this, though if the exception provides extra information you should at least read its message.
|
|
|
|
|
In a production app, I would log the exception and/or take a different course of action.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am attempting to create a benchmarking software that reads the contents of files.
I would like to report, every five seconds, the average speed per MB read, the speed in MB/sec.
I don't think that calculating a TimeSpan will be the best method, as it will definitely be inaccurate overtime (increasing in inaccuracy).
If I use a timer in the BackgroundWorker thread, how do I pass a variable to the ElapsedEventHandler that contains the amount of data read?
private void timer_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(AmountOfBytesRead);
}
public void ReadFiles(string TargetDirectory, bool RecursivePlz, string LogFilename)
{
DateTime StartOfReading = DateTime.Now;
System.Timers.Timer timer = new System.Timers.Timer();
timer = new System.Timers.Timer();
timer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(timer_Elapsed);
timer.Interval = 5000;
timer.Start();
...
}
Thanks,
Matt
|
|
|
|
|
A BackgroundWorker can report progress... Turn on the WorkerSupportsProgress flag, cast the "sender" to a BackgroundWorker and use that to send a progress report. You're supposed to send the completion percentage as an integer, but you can also supply a "state" object along with that, which could contain the bytes read.
Now, if you want to get the amount of data read in the past X seconds, you need a rolling buffer... Maybe it could go something like this:
1) Every N bytes (Maybe every 500KB or so), the worker reports the bytes read as a progress event
2) The handler dumps that into a rolling buffer with a time stamp (DateTime), and maintains a pointer to the oldest record within the desired time span.
3) The speed is calculated as (BytesRead[current] - BytesRead[oldest]) / (TimeStamp[current] - TimeStamp[oldest]) and put into a class-level variable.
4) Every so often, your timer can just read that variable to report the speed (Or whatever you want to do with it)
|
|
|
|
|
That's a great idea. I was thinking backward.
The concern is cross-thread communication, and I think you addressed this.
BackgroundWorker_ProgressChange() has access to the main thread, which includes all objects in the inclusive/root class, such as a class-wide variable to hold a value, and the Timer object and events.
I still have the problem of accuracy, "left over" bytes when polling occurs.
I'll get testing!
Thanks very much,
Matt
modified on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:33 AM
|
|
|
|
|
bbranded wrote: I still have the problem of accuracy, "left over" bytes when polling occurs.
Not really, with the rolling buffer... You would keep the actual time of each report (You could even pass a DateTime+Integer struct from the worker to eliminate cross-thread delays), so you wouldn't have to make any assumptions... Your buffer would look something like:
11:37:50 1500KB
11:37:52 2000KB
...
11:42:30 58000KB
11:42:33 58500KB
So you would get:
(58500KB - 1500KB) / (11:42:33 - 11:37:50)
= 57000KB / 4:43
And I'm too lazy to calculate that out, but that'll give you a KB/minute for the past ~5 minutes. And of course you can adjust the numbers to get whatever level of precision you want. The timer wouldn't actually be used to do any measurements, but rather to just report the results.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
