|
AspDotNetDev wrote: This isn't the first time this has happened recently, and somebody else told me this happened to them when they were voting on one of my articles recently
It was me. Here.[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go to his member page and report him. There's no reason to tolerate people like that. Like you did, I noticed some incorrect things about the code he posted, that never would have compiled. He's obviously not giving an accurate picture, and I don't think he knows how to use the debugger. He's a cookbook programmer. Report him, and have a beer on me.
|
|
|
|
|
I Agree.. I wouldnt even go as far as calling him a Programmer..
Real Programmers try and diagnose the problem themselves rather than rely on others.
JC
|
|
|
|
|
Agree!
// ♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
// 99 bugs in the code
// We fix a bug, compile it again
// 101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know, the really annoying part of it all is I was actually trying to help... 
|
|
|
|
|
The guy is clearly a bit of a prat but I don't see him downvoting you; are you sure it's him?
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: The guy is clearly a bit of a prat but I don't see him downvoting you; are you
sure it's him?
He's actually commented about 5ing the OP's posts, so it seems he's throwing a few 5s in now.
|
|
|
|
|
he changed those 5s to 1s right as I was trying to help him more... that's why I know it was him... there was a post with 2 5's, one from SA and one from him, after he got angry that changed to one 5 and one 1, then a bunch of other -4s started following me around (since that's all he can subtract with his status).
|
|
|
|
|
see my comment to nishant, he started by 5'ing then changed his votes
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Holguin wrote: This kid's following me around downvoting unrelated entries
Upvoting rather. He seems to have given you a few 5s (based on his comments) to try and get on your good side. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow that would scare me out of QA for a while.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah... definitely creepy
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was kind of funny at first, until he just wouldn't go away... then started downvoting
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like the mentality of a spoiled brat that is used to getting what they want. Probably pressured by parents to go into engineering or something similar based on the pay. However, this type of person will go absolutely nowhere in this industry.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rutvik Dave wrote: 'Santosh' means 'Satisfaction'
that is ironic and funny! 
|
|
|
|
|
[At the risk of opening a big can 'o worms...]
Might I suggest a per-article limit to the number of downloads for which reputation points are awarded?
I've only submitted two articles (so far), and have already made it to "Legend" level for Author, the majority of reputation points coming from downloads (3800+) for my 2nd article. As much as I am gratified by the positive attention, it doesn't seem right having achieved the maximum Author level after only two articles.
Either that, or add more levels (Legend-2 at 50,000 points, Legend-3 at 100,000 points, etc).
Comments?
|
|
|
|
|
This has been beaten to death repeatedly over several threads over the last few weeks. Maunder's said there will be a change to the download points prior to parsing the logs and giving a decade of retroactive points. (Apparently he didn't like the idea of his getting 1M additional points and moving into first.) He's refused to say in advance what the change he's going to make will be though. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Shhhh... you're going to ruin it for the rest of us. I've been relying on one article to get me to gold. 
|
|
|
|
|
wow! ...very honorable of you to suggest this... 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to lower the points from 5 to 1.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I still think it seems a bit high, but I guess stopping there let you keep all your math in integer form which has some benefit.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I think it should be 1 for every N downloads...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
