|
Well, I really wanted to ask if anyone else thought that using someone else's code samples was plagiarism.
...and I have extensive experience writing computer code, including OIC, BTW, BRB, IMHO, LMAO, ROFL, TTYL.....
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Gaylard wrote: if anyone else thought that using someone else's code samples was
plagiarism
Well, I do. If I were the original author and my hard work was being ripped off by somebody else, I wouldn't be best pleased.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I will report it.
...and I have extensive experience writing computer code, including OIC, BTW, BRB, IMHO, LMAO, ROFL, TTYL.....
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the report Wayne. The article has been removed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
When I answer one question and add line
#include <atlstr.h>
than it display like
#include <atlstr.h>
I tried it two to three times but not succeeded.
Is it a bug ?? Please check.
Reason: I use the code block after adding the string.
Thanks
"Every Little Smile can touch Somebody's Heart...
May we find Hundreds of Reasons to Smile Everyday... and
May WE be the Reason for someone else to smile always!" (ICAN)
modified on Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
did you escape any < and > and & as you should in an HTML environment?
your example doesn't work for me, you don't include a thing, probably there was something like <filename> which looks a bit like an unrecognized HTML tag, and would get swallowed.
You might want to read this[^].
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, when I view the source of the OP, I see the first line should have been:
#include <atlstr.h>
And the second line should have been:
#include <atlstr.h></atlstr.h>
I imagine the problem they are running into is 1) they are not escaping their HTML characters so 2) Code Project is detecting an open tag and automatically adding a close tag (at least, that's the way CP's code seems to be seeing it).
|
|
|
|
|
IMO there is ample opportunity here for CP to do a better job.
They could check all < and > signs and the text enclosed, and whenever it isn't an acceptable HTML tag, automatically escape those angulars.
I always considered it a poor choice accepting HTML inside PRE blocks, there is more harm than benefit here (especially when the bold effect, potentially the most useful one, isn't working [particularly well).
Of course the OP is also at fault, as he didn't check his message, he should have seen it wasn't conveying what he meant.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Luc,
Thanks for your reply. Actually yesterday I was facing problem that when I first type the line and use pre tag than it display incorrectly but if I use pre tag first and than type the line than it display correctly.Today I am doing the same and it is working fine.
I don't understand why file name is not displayed here. No escaping of < and >. May be the reason that I am not using pre tag.
"Every Little Smile can touch Somebody's Heart...
May we find Hundreds of Reasons to Smile Everyday... and
May WE be the Reason for someone else to smile always!" (ICAN)
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what happened since yesterday, however your original message looks different now.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I did it. I want to show you the problem but today many times I tried and not find the issue that I was facing yesterday.
"Every Little Smile can touch Somebody's Heart...
May we find Hundreds of Reasons to Smile Everyday... and
May WE be the Reason for someone else to smile always!" (ICAN)
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Administrator,
Kindly reset my Debator status points.
Regards,
JustWorking
|
|
|
|
|
Why should they? Looking at your rep-graph and messgae history, it looks about right. You've posted drivel and been down voted for it, hense the negative rep.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
This message is for the administrator. Are you admin of this site? I don't think soo.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at some of your posts, such as this one[^]; no wonder your reputation is suffering. Try adding some value to the site and see what a difference it makes.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Why you did that????????? now all saw this post and downvoted it so you and the people like are you the reason of my nigative rep 
|
|
|
|
|
You're really not helping yourself are you? Why not try taking my advice instead of kicking off every time someone tries to point you in the right direction?
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
JustWorking wrote: people like are you the reason of my nigative rep
Nope. That's entirely self inflicted.
|
|
|
|
|
Look, the admins aren't going to "reset" your points. You've been told this as a courtesy by another member. Your points are a reflection of your participation here - again, you've been told this by another member. Only YOU can reset your debator points. Your debator points low becaise other users are voting your posts down. I don't know why they are, but the most probable reason is that you're being an ass hat (and the message of yours that I'mn replying to is an indication that this is indeed the case).
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
The voitinf system here is so messed up  members her vote before looking at the content pf the post and just by who is posting the post  and my previous answer is so true and nothing wrong in it... So I'm reporting this bug too
|
|
|
|
|
Most members vote on content. There will always be a bias that when people look at a border line case - is it worth up / down voting - that they will consider who it is. JSOP telling someone to "eat s*** and d**" will get away with it, I would not. Similarly if a member repeatedly gives stupid answers they'll get a reputation that there opinion is less than relevant. Even I will flipantly say "just google it" when a question is so trivial that any result on the first page would tell the user the answer. But I would endevour to give the criteria I entered.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you've got a reputation on the site now. The fact that people are voting based on your reuptation isn't a bug, since it's determinate elements can be traced directly to your own behavior. Along with stop bing a retard, you probably need to change your user id hand hope nobody realizes that you've changed it.
Of course, you could just stop visiting CodeProject. I'm sure nobody would miss you at this point.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt they are going to do that. The points are a reflection of all your measured activity on the site. Having a reset button effectively negates the purpose, which is to see at a glance, what a persons reputation is. With this reputation, you have a decent enough starting point for working out whether or not an answer given by somebody is likely to be accurate.
If you are that worried about your status, get this account deleted and start again; and this time try posting intelligent thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: The points are a reflection of all your measured activity on the site
Here where I disagree with you. The points here reflect the bounch of people that think they are cool or ruling this site and they downvote posts just by looking at who is posting the post, and the pove is this thread here, I was sending a message to the admin to show my point of view about the voting system and it got downvoted  why telling my point of view get downvoted for so we need to correct the voting system coz it is all messed up.
JustWorking
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
