|
Exactly! 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Today morning I just pointed my mouse to Slacker007 in SoapBox, and with surprise there was no user reputation popup. I found that the option in the settings was automatically unselected.
I select it once again, and enjoying rep popups whole day. And now once again it is cleared. 
Is there a bug? I reset it again.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a checkbox on top of the forum (next to the noise level) check it there and hit update.
I haven't had any trouble since I did that.
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^] you go guys and girls. Time for you to do your nuclear bit.
|
|
|
|
|
My nuke is on the way.
I think we need another 2 to have a nice explosion 
|
|
|
|
|
Taking off for orbit now...
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Whats the limit to get auto-nuked? I see 11 reports as a spammer and yet the account stays! 
|
|
|
|
|
It's up to the round dozen but still she stays. Is it a case of style persists where fashion fails or do we need to nuke her only message[^] as well?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|
|
Dang, it's not easy to nuke somebody. 15 reports now.
|
|
|
|
|
Small bug ("==" instead of ">=" for those who like to point and guffaw) was not letting the account be nuked. Nukes released. Dust settling.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can you say which 2+ CPians nukes struck closely enough to each other that the replication process skipped over the magic number?
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen this several times this morning, and my filters are empty.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Is that your way of saying you took a really big code dump?
|
|
|
|
|
Again, a load issue.
Did it persist for several refreshes for a short time, long time, or was it sporadic over a short or long time?
I'll turn on some debug diagnostics and see what's happening.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It persisted for most of the morning.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
I've given things a good kick. Should be faster now and far less prone to timeouts.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have come across an article What Happens during a PLINQ Query?[^] in which the examples were taken straight from the book LinQ to Objects Using C# 4.0 by Troy Magennis. The words in the article appear to be written by the CP member, but the examples are most definitely not his own. Please could someone just confirm this, and let me know if this is condoned or whether the article should be withdrawn. Many Thanks.
[EDIt]
The author in question has cited the book in his references, although the examples come verbatim from the book's code samples.[/EDIT]
...and I have extensive experience writing computer code, including OIC, BTW, BRB, IMHO, LMAO, ROFL, TTYL.....
|
|
|
|
|
Report it as plagiarized (in the article itself), and it will be dealt with.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I really wanted to ask if anyone else thought that using someone else's code samples was plagiarism.
...and I have extensive experience writing computer code, including OIC, BTW, BRB, IMHO, LMAO, ROFL, TTYL.....
|
|
|
|
|
Wayne Gaylard wrote: if anyone else thought that using someone else's code samples was
plagiarism
Well, I do. If I were the original author and my hard work was being ripped off by somebody else, I wouldn't be best pleased.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I will report it.
...and I have extensive experience writing computer code, including OIC, BTW, BRB, IMHO, LMAO, ROFL, TTYL.....
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the report Wayne. The article has been removed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
When I answer one question and add line
#include <atlstr.h>
than it display like
#include <atlstr.h>
I tried it two to three times but not succeeded.
Is it a bug ?? Please check.
Reason: I use the code block after adding the string.
Thanks
"Every Little Smile can touch Somebody's Heart...
May we find Hundreds of Reasons to Smile Everyday... and
May WE be the Reason for someone else to smile always!" (ICAN)
modified on Thursday, May 19, 2011 10:49 PM
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
