|
That would be a reasonable guess.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
I am planning to develop a blog website. I want to know how to upload and save the media files such as photoz and videos similar to what Facebook or Youtube do it? is it better to save as binary file on the ftp folder or a blob in my database?
please discuss....
|
|
|
|
|
There are pros and cons to each method, one is not better than the other. It all depends on your usage and needs. Storing and serving files from disk will be faster but will require more maintenance. Using a database is slower since the files most be accessed first but is easier for backup and load balancing.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
so you think facebook and youtube are using physical files not database blob?
|
|
|
|
|
In facebook, you can send the photo to an email address and then it will be automatically added to the Mobile Album in your profile? how to process the same using ASP.NET?
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of ways this can be accomplished. It depends a great deal on your architecture, design and skills, which from your previous questions, I would say is out of reach for you at your current level.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
if you are developing a blog website where user create profiles for their blogs, which way you'll prefer to use for the profile URL:
myProfile.myDomain.com
or:
myDomain.com/myProfile
and why please?
|
|
|
|
|
From a developers point of view I would prefer the mydomain.com/myProfile version. This way you don't have to update the DNS records constantly when a new user signs up or an old one is removed. Not to mention that it makes the domain management in apache or IIS easier.
That being said, the first option might not even be possible with most standard hosting packages, but you would have to check with your hosting provider.
|
|
|
|
|
I would go with myProfile.myDomain.com, for the simple reason that LiveJournal, WordPress, BlogSpot and most other blogger domains use this format. Bloggers have come to expect it, readers have come to expect it, and I think you will be shooting yourself in the foot if you do not offer it as the standard.
From an administrative standpoint, I think most of the DNS changes can be managed automatically, so there shouldn't be a lot of management overhead.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Anyone knows where can I search for domains by number of characters? for example, I want a domain with a max of 8 characters? I tried GoDaddy but it's not allowing to specify the no of chars?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi friend,
Use this link to convert video files into flv format.
http://an-it-solution.blogspot.com/2008/12/convert-viedo-to-flv-using-cnet-on-web.html
Regards,
Sathya
|
|
|
|
|
Or you could just upload your video to YouTube, then play it back and snatch the FLV from your cache.
Or u8se one of the many many free and not-so-free programs to do it. 
|
|
|
|
|
bye bye spam! vote of 1!
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings,
I’m uncertain of the right forum for this question, so apologies if it is misplaced.
My organization has been working with a series of small, custom built “CMS” tools to manage some of the content on our site. These tools save database information as well as images to the file system of the web server. Example: we have an actor bios section that lists the roles and plays of the performers (stored in SQL Server) and includes an image of the performer (saved to the file system with a varchar pointer to the image in the database). This worked well for us in past years, but we have recently moved to a load balanced environment and it has introduced some complexity. The two web servers are using a shared database, so that part is easy. However, they have separate file systems which are both synced to a third box (a staging environment). The staging server has it’s own database. This causes a couple problems: it means that anything uploaded to one server through the tools will be missing the image in the file system on the second server, and more importantly it means that unless the staging server also has the data entered along with the image that when we do a sync from staging to live it obliterates the images on the live environments. For the time being, we are entering everything on the staging environment and syncing all of the files and database content at once (I’m using SQLBulkCopy to move the relevant tables from staging to live). This creates undesirable limitations for our Marketing department, however, who are accustomed (and rightfully) to being able to make on-the-fly changes to low-risk content in the live environment without ITS intervention.
Whew.
So my question finally is how do I reconcile the staging database/live shared database and the file system issues such that my Marketing group can make content changes easily in the live, load-balanced, environments. Ideally, I wanted to be able to have them enter all the data as well as images on the staging site and “make them live”, copying both the data and relevant images to the file systems of both web servers. I have not found a way to be on one web server and, using a CMS-like web tool, copy an image to a different web server (perhaps with good reason…).
I am using ASP.NET 3.5, Visual Studio 2010, and SQL Server 2008. The site runs in IIS7. We code in C#.
Thanks in advance for any guidance you can provide.
Matt Belanger
Web Developer
|
|
|
|
|
guys;
i have in the form several sumit buttons, how can i distinguish between them?
thank you;
Help people,so poeple can help you.
|
|
|
|
|
That depends a bit on what type of a button you are using. But if it is a input of the type button then you can give it a name. This name will be the parameter the value will be under in the POST or GET data.
Please note that the button should be inside the form tags for this to work.
|
|
|
|
|
thank you, sir;
but lets take some case to claerfy somthing:
<from id="form1" name="form1" method="post" >
<input type="text" id="textbox1" name="textbox1" />
<input type="submit" id="button1" name="button1" />
<input type="text" id="textbox2" name="textbox2" />
<input type="submit" id="button2" name="button2" />
</form>
when this form is post, how can i determin the control which caused the postback?
Help people,so poeple can help you.
|
|
|
|
|
With the type input='submit' the name and value of that input are also sent to the server. But not of any other buttons with type submit. So clicking on button2 would result in the followin querystring:
<br />
myform.html?textbox1=somevalue&textbox2=somevalue&button2=somevalue<br />
|
|
|
|
|
thank you, sir;
i that is what i was asking for
100 ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) , man
Help people,so poeple can help you.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think the button ID and text are sent to the server via the query string on a postback.
|
|
|
|
|
This Info really helped me!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought, this is related to web-development so posted here. Please excuse me, if there is alternate proper forum for this.
Hi,
I have a requirement in which, i need to import session of IE to Firefox.
I checked the Session Manager plugin in Firefox, but it is only Firefox limited.
This requirement came from an application that is hard-core written on Login to run for IE browser and says HTTPS session error by Servlet if any other browser is used. Solution to run on other browsers, say Firefox would be to import session from IE ton Firefox.
Any help appreciated. Thanks.
---
Solved by Gerben's answer. Thanks.
---
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
modified on Thursday, May 5, 2011 6:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Ok how do you define a session. As the thing the server keeps track of in which you can store server side data for the duration of the visit or as in the session cookies which will persist for as long as the user keeps the browser open.
If it is the first then that should be relatively easily. The server side session is usually kept track of in a sessionid cookie, or a sessionid parameter in the request. You could pass this along from one browser to another, but you would be opening up the application to a possibility to hack it.
If it is the cookie type of session it becomes a bit more difficult, you could serialize the cookies in the session to the server using IE and store them there pending a second call from Firefox. During this second call you could set all the cookies back into the session. But this is a bit tricky.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I use the wsdl command to generate the client proxy for the java web service. And the service contain only one method and it like this:
[System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapDocumentMethodAttribute("", RequestNamespace="namespacess", ResponseNamespace="namespacess", Use=System.Web.Services.Description.SoapBindingUse.Literal, ParameterStyle=System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapParameterStyle.Wrapped)]
[return: System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute("return", Form=System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaForm.Unqualified)]
public string execute([System.Xml.Serialization.XmlElementAttribute(Form=System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaForm.Unqualified)] string arg0) {
object[] results = this.Invoke("execute", new object[] {
arg0});
return ((string)(results[0]));
}
I create a custom SoapExtension class that is used to calculate the serialize and deserialize time when calling this method. I found that serialize will take more than 2000
Milliseconds. The soap serialization take much time and it's not acceptable.
the soapextension class is like this:
public class TraceSoapExtension : SoapExtension
{
public override void ProcessMessage(SoapMessage message)
{
string methodname = message.MethodInfo.Name;
string tmpInfo = "Call web method: " + methodname + " ";
switch (message.Stage)
{
case SoapMessageStage.BeforeSerialize:
stc.Reset(); stc.Start();
tmpInfo = tmpInfo + "Before the soap message serialize: " + Environment.NewLine +
"Time is: " + System.DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().ToString("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss.ffffff");
break;
case SoapMessageStage.AfterSerialize:
stc.Stop();
tmpInfo = tmpInfo + "After the soap message serialize: " + Environment.NewLine +
"Time is: " + System.DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().ToString("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss.ffffff");
tmpInfo += " Client serialize stop watch take time: " + stc.ElapsedMilliseconds;
break;
case SoapMessageStage.BeforeDeserialize:
stc.Reset(); stc.Start();
tmpInfo = tmpInfo + "Receive soap message before deserialize: " + Environment.NewLine +
"Time is: " + System.DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().ToString("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss.ffffff");
break;
case SoapMessageStage.AfterDeserialize:
stc.Stop();
tmpInfo = tmpInfo + "Receive soap message after deserizlie: " + Environment.NewLine +
"Time is: " + System.DateTime.Now.ToUniversalTime().ToString("MM/dd/yyyy hh:mm:ss.ffffff");
tmpInfo += " Client deserialize stop watch take time: " + stc.ElapsedMilliseconds;
break;
default:
break;
}
CommonUtil.Logger.Info(tmpInfo);
}
}
So what's happened when the do the soap serialization? Why is it so slowly? What can I do to improve the performance?
thanks,
Eric
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
