|
A TabControl with a number of TabPages is exactly what is required here; it is an excellent way of grouping related stuff, and showing it, page by page, in a structured and well-understood way.
Decent TabControls support multi-row tabs; I just saw Dev Express has one. And anyway, a tip that provokes dozens of alternatives isn't worth a dime in the first place, when there are more than five alternatives, then there wasn't really a problem to begin with.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Your solution assumes an ideal Tip with an ideal number of Alternates. When it doesn't happen that way, guess what? We'll have another mess.
We can fix this with a solution that's scalable and easy to understand and use. Tabs just won't work in this situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Even better: Next Tip in Thread and Prev Tip in Thread buttons at the top and bottom of each Tip, which would make this flexible and expandable.
I think Luc's idea would be good for some situations, but not this one. For example, it's missing the key feature of being able to see all the sub-Tips, and see what the ratings are for the Tip and its sub-Tips.
Also, there are other UI features that could be implemented to make this scheme more user-friendly. Example: make the list of Tips incorporate collapso/expando buttons for those Tips with sub-Tips; this would make it easier to find the topic that interests you, and then you could drill down to the sub-Tips.
As I think about it, the more I'm convinced that this approach would lend itself very nicely to Articles, too. It would solve some of the more obvious problems, like people who want to extend the original article; and it would also provide a way to deal with "abandoned" Articles.
An added plus is that it would provide clean-looking, compatible and consistent handling for both Tips and Articles.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the first thing to do would be have the comments contained in a collapsible frame with the number of comments shown next to the expand/collapse control e.g. Comments (xx) View/Hide
The default would be hidden.
|
|
|
|
|
That would help the clutter but provide no other benefit. Just a bandaid.
|
|
|
|
|
Bandaids are good.......they stop my children crying when they are broke.
|
|
|
|
|
Until they fall off...then the scab is exposed...it's scratched...there's blood everywhere...infection sets in...the wounded limb removed...parents and well-wishers cringe at the horrible, disgusting, mutilated sight...nothing is the same, ever again. Depression ensues.
|
|
|
|
|
Scab picking is so satisfying 
|
|
|
|
|
Great. That's what I'm going to be thinking next time I make a change.
No pressure.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I know that I, for damn certain, didn't type my post into this[^] site and yet there it is - CP ripped.
|
|
|
|
|
They have bigger ads than CP though. 
|
|
|
|
|
Great.
We'll send a nastygram. That's just rude.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I occasionally provide a bad link in my messages, typically pointing to the local copy of one of my articles, rather than the link to the publicly available article. Therefore my suggestion is this:
whenever a URL contains "//localhost" or "//127", just show a MessageBox to the composer, telling him the link is suspicious. Somewhat similar to the reply-to-self approach.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
0 Bug: If you set two tags in your filter (eg Windows, API) it displays this text at the top of the page: You're viewing entries on the topics WindowsAPI. Note the missing delimiter between the two. Note the lack of a colon before the list.
1 Inconsistency: Also it seems inconsistent that Interested tags are listed at the top, but Ignored tags are not.
2 Inconsistency: Interested and Ignore are different tenses; you should use the same for both. 
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: 1 Inconsistency: Also it seems inconsistent that Interested tags are listed at the top, but Ignored tags are not.
I actually like that... why would I want the tags that I'm not interested in up there? Specially since there are a ton of tags...
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted. Fixed, and will upload ASAP
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just noticed there's no WinAPI or Windows API tag in the Q&A section. 
|
|
|
|
|
There's specific Windows versions, and an API tag. I expect a combination of the two would suffice.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: There's specific Windows versions, and an API tag. I expect a combination of the two would suffice.
I don't. Setting my filters to Windows, API gets stuff tagged with either tag, but not both.
Win32 is the closest tag to what the OP wants, but ties it to a specific windows codebase.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
You filter? Suck it up and answer questions on topics you know nothing about. That's the way I roll.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: That's the way I roll.
...downhill...
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: answer questions on topics you know nothing about.
I thought that's what everyone does (apart from the great SAKryukov, of course).
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
He may not know the topic when he starts posting, but by the end he's written the definitive article on it.
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree... why is there a forum called "Windows API" then?
|
|
|
|
|
Why isn't there a tag called Get-togethers? The two aren't comparable.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
