|
as Tx > Rx and you want Tx first, descending should do it.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
It is not working
I gave like this
ORDER BY LruName, ChName, Type desc
|
|
|
|
|
in your example the Type isn't really relevant to the sort as all (LruName,ChName) combinations are unique already without the Type field.
So maybe you want
order by LruName, Type DESC, ChName
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
yaah... it is working
I got what I want
thank u very much.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the problems you are going to have is with the ChName column. It appears as though you want CH5 to appear before CH24. In your order by clause you may have to have it
order by .... ,length(ChName),ChName, ...
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Luc Pattyn
solved my problem
thank you for the reply
|
|
|
|
|
That's a good solution for a common problem.
A five from me even if it wasn't what the OP wanted.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Jörgen.
Jörgen Andersson wrote: even if it wasn't what the OP wanted.
Oddly, in the original post he indicated what output he was after and so I'm pretty sure he is going to have to do something similar to what I offered.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
I thought so too, and was contemplating looking up a stringsplit function that does the same job in a much more tortuous way.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling it's only going to work if all the name values start with the same prefix.
Supposing I have:
A1
A20
A999
C1
C99
Sorting them by length(name), name would give:
A1
C1
A20
C99
A999
So it would solve the OP's specific problem where all names appear to start with CH but I'm not sure it works as a general solution.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you're quite correct.
We have exactly this issue and have solved it with a separate sortcolumn.
But this isn't always a viable solution, and then one has to build a natural sort function[^].
|
|
|
|
|
just the following,-
order by LruName, ChName, Type DESC
|
|
|
|
|
When a variable in my stored procedure contains an apostrophe, it returns me an error.
I've tried the function REPLACE() but no luck.
waiting for your suggesions.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
berba wrote: I've tried the function REPLACE() but no luck.
waiting for your suggesions.
I suggest you post the error-message that you got when you tried that function, or the code that you tried.
I are Troll 
|
|
|
|
|
Without seeing the code that uses the variable and how the variable is applied to the code, it's difficult to know what is happening. And also knowing what the error return is will help out as well.
Just a guess, but usually embedded apostrophes within strings will need to be escaped somehow. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
|
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_GetEZQueryList @@sUser as nchar(500), @@sSupervisor as char(1), @@sAllowed as varchar(8000) AS
--set @@sUser = REPLACE(@@sUser, '''''','''''')
IF @@sSupervisor <> 'Y'
SELECT
EzqDateMod, EzqFlxID, EzqUserName, EzqName, EzqData, EzqDescrip
FROM EZQuery
WHERE (EzqUserName=@@sUser)
OR (EzqUserName='SYSTEM' AND Cast(EzqFlxID as varchar(10)) IN (select * FROM intlist_to_tbl(@@sAllowed)))
ELSE
SELECT
EzqDateMod, EzqFlxID, EzqUserName, EzqName, EzqData, EzqDescrip
FROM EZQuery
GO
The SP is retrieving @@sUser from VB and its getting the value Do'Sullivan.
When I ran a trace I found it is executing the SP like this
exec sp_getezquerylist 'DO' + CHAR(39) + 'SULLIVAN', 'n', '100'
Think + CHAR(39) + is causing the error
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_GetEZQueryList @@sUser as nchar(500), @@sSupervisor as char(1), @@sAllowed as varchar(8000) AS
--set @@sUser = REPLACE(@@sUser, '''''','''''')
IF @@sSupervisor <> 'Y'
SELECT
EzqDateMod, EzqFlxID, EzqUserName, EzqName, EzqData, EzqDescrip
FROM EZQuery
WHERE (EzqUserName=@@sUser)
OR (EzqUserName='SYSTEM' AND Cast(EzqFlxID as varchar(10)) IN (select * FROM intlist_to_tbl(@@sAllowed)))
ELSE
SELECT
EzqDateMod, EzqFlxID, EzqUserName, EzqName, EzqData, EzqDescrip
FROM EZQuery
GO
The SP is retrieving @@sUser from VB and its getting the value Do'Sullivan.
When I ran a trace I found it is executing the SP like this
exec sp_getezquerylist 'DO' + CHAR(39) + 'SULLIVAN', 'n', '100'
Think + CHAR(39) + is causing the error
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Little Debugging..
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_GetEZQueryList
(
@sUser AS nchar(500) ,
@sSupervisor AS char(1) ,
@sAllowed AS varchar(8000)
)
AS
IF @sSupervisor <> 'Y'
SELECT
EzqDateMod ,
EzqFlxID ,
EzqUserName ,
EzqName ,
EzqData ,
EzqDescrip
FROM
EZQuery
WHERE
( EzqUserName = @sUser )
OR
( EzqUserName = 'SYSTEM' )
ELSE
SELECT
EzqDateMod ,
EzqFlxID ,
EzqUserName ,
EzqName ,
EzqData ,
EzqDescrip
FROM
EZQuery
GO
exec sp_getezquerylist 'DO''SULLIVAN', 'N', '100'
Executes fine, without the IN clase to look up
The source of your issues appear to be in this function (I assume its a function based on the nomenclature) intlist_to_tbl. If intlist_to_tbl is really a function why are you sending that data to the db, and converting it instead of storing it in the db?
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm fairly new tyo SSRS, so bear with me...
I created a report that is getting its data from a stored procedure. When I run the stored procesure in the data tab it is returning 68 rows, yet only 1 rows shows up on the report in preview, and, it's the last row in the dataset.
If I export the data as a CSV to the desktop, there is only one row in the data.
I have no clue how to debug this. Could use some help.
Thanks
Everything makes sense in someone's mind
modified on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
I have run into this a couple of times, look for a {file name}.rdl.data file and delete it it. That contains a cached set of data for the report.
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
hi everybody,
I have a big problem with update statement, let me mention the situation by exact script and results!
first create trans table=>
create table trans(
id bigint identity(1,1) not null,
price decimal(18,0) null,
relatedid bigint null)
Then fill it by this script
Insert into trans (price,relatedid)values(100,NULL)
Insert into trans (price,relatedid)values(100,NULL)
Insert into trans (price,relatedid)values(500,NULL)
Insert into trans (price,relatedid)values(1,NULL)
Insert into trans (price,relatedid)values(1,3)
Now run this query!
Update trans
set price=(case when relatedid is null then (select avg(price) from trans where id=<t.id)
else (select top(1) price from trans where id=t.relatedid) end)
from trans t
After execution of query I expect this result:
id-----price-----relatedid
1 100 NULL
2 300 NULL
3 200 NULL
4 200 3 <======== realy expected!!!!
But this is the result!!!
id-----price-----relatedid
1 100 NULL
2 300 NULL
3 200 NULL <======= #3 row
4 1 3 <===== wrong value, i mean this is the value before update
row with id 3 has been updated before but update doesnt know this!!!!!
WHAT I NEED i need to get expected result from this execution!!!! plzzzzzzzzzzz
modified on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 10:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you have processing half in your database and half in you application. Change the design to move all the processing into one platform or make sure the database returns the results from the update (possibly with a simple select from updated record changing the return type to a datatable)
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
So are you saying that the function doesn't see the refreshed situation. If that's the case, perhaps you're running the update in a different transaction or you are feeding 'old' values as parameters to the function.
The function should be able to fetch the current data from the database even if the transaction is still going on as long as you use the same transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
