|
So you need to break down the requirements into logical parts.
Employee can have zero or more managers.
So, your Employee class will need a property that has a variable size that is of type Manager. Perhaps a List<Manager>
Manager is an employee...
So the Manager class should derive from Employee as you have already done.
...who has one or more other employees reporting to him.
So the Manager class needs an additional property that has a variable size that is of type Employee. Possibly, the extra Manager class isn't needed as checking this property is > 0 will indicate that they are manager anyway.
This is what programming is all about, turning real world situations into code and in the case of OOP creating objects to represent them and adding properties to give the details/descriptions of thos objects and methods/events for the things they actually do. Not really that hard to grasp.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Dave, your comments were really helpful. I've given you my vote of 5.
However there is still a little confusion about the relationship, how could i get a list of managers for a given employee. For example, let's say I have an employee named "Frank" and he has two managers (Sean and manager2).
|
|
|
|
|
You should keep a list of the managers - something like this...
public class Employee
{
private string name;
private List<Manager> managers;
public string Name
{
get { return name; }
set { name = value; }
}
public List<Manager> Managers
{
get
{
if(managers == null)
return new List<Manager>();
return managers;
}
set { managers = value; }
}
}
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
modified on Thursday, June 24, 2010 6:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
You should use the UML tools, visio or rational rose to draw the class diagram.
The class Manager is derived from Employee,
The class employee and manager is depended by clas EmployeeReportingRelationships.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am using “Heaton Research” for crawling data. In this process I think a very small issue is there, which I am not getting, or rather leaving it each time. The basic problem which I am facing is to use the "SQLWorkloadManager" method in place of "WorkloadManager" , In the book example is given for "WorkloadManager" and it is for one site, and it is further said that if you want to use it for more sites, then use "SQLWorkloadManager", It is further written that it can be used, but I am not getting the way to use "SQLWorkloadManager", I am sure that it may be a very small thing, but I am confused and not getting it correctly, It is working fine with “WorkloadManager” but not working with “SQLWorkloadManager” Any Idea to solve the problem will be great. Thanks in advance.
Deepak Upreti
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Expert
i am using VS 2005 and Making Some .dll File but i see that their are
some tool like .net reflector like to decomplied the .dll file
code is their any way to prevent to decomplied my .NET Dll.
|
|
|
|
|
Use a tool like a Dotfuscator[^].
Unfortunately, such tools dont very often prevent assemblies from getting decompiled.
They just make the decompiled code harder to read.
|
|
|
|
|
The short answer is no. If someone wants to decompile it they will.
You could use an obfusticator to make it less readable, but that would not stop them being able to decompile it.
So the long answer is also no. 
Regards
David R
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis
The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
|
|
|
|
|
By design .NET embeds rich Meta data inside the executable code using MSIL. Anyone can easily decompile your DLL back using tools like ILDASM (owned by Microsoft) or Reflector for.NET which is a third party. Secondly there are many third party tools which make this decompiling process a click away. So any one can easily look in to your assemblies and reverse engineer them back in to actual source code and understand some real good logic which can make it easy to crack your application.
The process by which you can stop this reverse engineering is using “obfuscation”. It’s a technique which will foil the de compilers. There are many third parties (XenoCode, Demeanor for .NET) which provide .NET obfuscation solution. Microsoft includes one that is Dotfuscator Community Edition with Visual Studio.NET
lklklhjsdg
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone know what I can do about this.
I'm getting a user DirectoryEntry, modifying an attribute value, then committing the changes, and closing the entry, but on subsequent calls (re-get user directory->get attribute value), the value is the original... until about 10-15 seconds later.
I've tried using the RefreshCache method, and the UsePropertyCache property on the DirectoryEntry, but nothing seems to work. I don't understand why the value isn't set immediately (this is a dev ADAM server w/ virtually no load, it shouldn't be a performance issue).
Setting:
using ( DirectoryEntry entry = FindUserDirectoryEntry( username ) ) {
if ( entry != null ) {
if ( entry.Properties.Contains( attributeName ) ) {
entry.Properties[attributeName].Value = value;
} else if ( value.IsEmpty() == false ) {
entry.Properties[attributeName].Add( value );
}
entry.CommitChanges();
entry.Close();
}
}
Getting:
DirectoryEntry entry = this.ADAMProvider.GetUserDirectoryEntry( userName );
if ( entry != null ) {
if ( entry.Properties.Contains( attributeName ) ) {
entry.RefreshCache(attributeName);
value = entry.Properties[attributeName].Value.SafeToString();
}
entry.Close();
}
|
|
|
|
|
Ok... nvm... found my own answer. Turns out that I have to set the CacheResults on the DirectorySearcher (that finds my DirectoryEntry) to false. Now everything works immediately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't want to display a login for the user you have to disable anonymous access in IIS and then require AD. This will require your users to use IE or type in a user name and password. Then in the Global.aspx in the Authenticate event add your custom Principal which should override the Windows Principal. There are many articles online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I always load the roles from the database on every call instead of storing it in Session.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The proper way to handle this is to create an Authentication Provider and use the web.config to configure app to use it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/907hb5w9.aspx[^]
Also, this should have been posted to the ASP.NET forum since it clear deals with ASP.NET specifically and not C# in general
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
You probably already know this, but (just in case) you can add authorization in Web.Config also...
<authentication mode="Windows"/>
<identity impersonate="true"/>
<authorization>
<allow users="SomeDomain\SomeUserName"/>
<deny users="*"/>
</authorization>
|
|
|
|
|
dear Timothy CIAN /Ennis Ray Lynch,
I cannot add 500 domain\user name in webconfig..
i had a table that has columns
FName EMPID UserID
Tarun 1 domain\tarun
I am creating a intranet web application
1) requirement i used not be displayed the login form. they should be view my webapplication
2) if there are 1000 employees and only 10 employee information is stored in the database then only 10 employeessy should be able to browse the application. rest should not be
3) requirement. if the user browse the application or pages .. i should be able to store some information like userid in session or in whatever.. so that i should not hot the database again and again to check whether he is valid user or not.
4) so i thought of creating a generic class or global.asax.
5). all the article i saw were using cookies and forms authentication(is this the only way.. i mean i dont want to use cookies)
|
|
|
|
|
please do not remove messages, it is against the forum guidelines. 
|
|
|
|
|
READ THE DAMN GUIDELINES
Do not remove or empty a message if others have replied.
What part of this is not getting through to you?
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
hi, I'm able to close all processes including IE but I can not close the file explorer windows. They are not process I think because I can't see them among the processes. Any clue welcomed, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Found this somewhere - you can probably try it out.
I don't know if this will work though.
int myHandle;<br />
while ((myHandle = Win32.FindWindow("ExploreWClass", null)) > 0)<br />
{<br />
Win32.SendMessage(myHandle, Win32.WM_SYSCOMMAND, Win32.SC_CLOSE, 0);<br />
}
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, I've seen and tried that but even though I can find the Win32 namespace, FindWindow() method is absent.
|
|
|
|
|
Then you should pinvoke FindWindow and SendMessage - those should be on www.pinvoke.net with examples of how to use them.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
