|
|
yes, no problem. Looks very much like the beta home page. I managed to log in.
Are you in lots of parallel universes??
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
this is a reply from s.codeproject.com
|
|
|
|
|
for s.codeproject.com I got served by Web20 and Web24
for www.codeproject.com I got served by Web20, Web21, and Web23
(tried both URL about 10 times).
Not sure what I'm supposed to see/test/prove though.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
It means you can see those domains, so it means you are probably not having problems with some content missing. I've split some of the content between www and s in order to allow browsers to open more connections than normal, meaning more downloads in parallel, meaning a faster response.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
OK.
After power-cycling my PC and modem, and reconnecting to ADSL, everything looked normal again.
Nothing major, getting access to all sites but one was a first, I didn't quite understand what could have gone wrong.
Cheers.
PS: I'll switch off the lights now...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds very much like a DNS caching issue.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Without digging into the data, my first guess would be that a lot of the edits or votes may have been on items that have since been deleted.
[Edit] Do you tend to click "accept answer" a fair bit?
[Edit] Looks like it was some reporting data that went missing (Bad articles, Q & A's, and messages). Will re-add them.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
modified on Sunday, May 16, 2010 11:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
??
Organizer rep is either voting up (it seems unlikely those items got massively removed), or reporting articles/messages. Are you saying that, once the targets get removed, those report points get disposed of on the next recalculation? If so, it seems logical not to reward the reporting at all...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't seem right to me that you *lose* Organizer points when the things you've been "organizing" have been deleted.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Part of the issue is that we're trying to back-date events on a system not designed to fully store all the information we might have needed. I did find one place where deleted items, in rare circumstances, may have failed to provide rep points on a recalc. The main issue I found, though, was in one place we may not be picking up reports on bad articles. An easy fix for this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I assume the recalc from yesterday is now done, but as a result, I lost something like 1000 (or more) organizer points. I was silver before (approaching gold), now I'm bronze.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed[^] the price of precious metals has risen.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting the following error whenever I try to open any member's profile page:
Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Ticket: 2410475. Server: Web23
Edit: I'm guessing it has something to do with the post below..
Edit #2: Fixed by Chris. 
![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif) Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
modified on Sunday, May 16, 2010 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Read the previous message here.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
asked in previous post! 
|
|
|
|
|
I was composing this message while you posted yours, so I didn't see it before I posted mine. My bad.
Kristian Sixhoej
"I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined,
and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road." - Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
amazing how much that happens really........
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - right in the middle of an update so a temp error. All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
To fix a minor issue from a few weeks ago, and add points for voting in surveys, we're rerunning the reputation calculator to repopulate member reps.
For the next few hours reputation will be a little all over the place.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is that why i get;
Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Ticket: 2410419. Server: Web23
when i click on my member profile?
|
|
|
|
|
I think you guys need to refactor your reputation point calculation code so you can pick/choose which category (or categories) get recalculated. That way, if you discover a problem in a single category, like "Participant", you can kick off a recalc of just that category. It would be faster,and less disturbing to users.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
We can, but it's not guaranteed to always work.
The points you get in one category can depend on the member level of the voter in a different category (though they don't at the moment). We have to go right back to the beginning and recalculate everyone, then step through, day by day, so that the votes at that point in time are given the correct weighting for the given category on the day the vote was made.
Frankly, reworking the recalc scripts is something I really don't want to do because they are complex enough as it is.
It's been months since we've done this, it's a lazy Sunday morning, and I reckon the world won't stop turning if rep points are weird for 5 more hours.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
How about duplicating each of the rep fields into a real one and a temporary one (normally zero). Then:
- always show/use the largest of the two;
- a recalculation could be: copy real to temp; clear real; recalculate; clear temp again.
Advantages:
- nobody would notice until done and the difference is significant.
- privileges such as edit and delete, would not be temporarily lifted (for about 6 hours).
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
modified on Sunday, May 16, 2010 12:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation seems finished, there are some surprises:
- I lost 700 Organizer points (that is 40%), and I'm not the only one (there were 40 platinum/golds, now 28);
- my Debator rep has risen by more than 1500;
- overall some 1200 points gained.
I feel very disorganized now. 
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
