Click here to Skip to main content
15,891,700 members
Articles / Programming Languages / C# 4.0

C# 4.0 New Features – Named and Optional Parameters

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.90/5 (10 votes)
22 Mar 2010CPOL2 min read 24.4K   7   9
One of the new features in C# 4.0 – Named and Optional Parameters. Actually these are not a single feature, but two different features.

In this post, I will talk about one of the new features in C# 4.0 – Named and Optional Parameters. Actually these are not a single feature, but two different features. You can get more benefit if you work with them together. So, what are those? Named parameter is a way to provide a parameter to the method using the name of the corresponding parameter instead of its position in the parameter list. Whereas, optional parameter allows you to omit arguments to member invocation.

Let us discuss it in depth with a simple example. First, start with the Optional Parameter. Suppose you are creating a Calculator application where you have to do some “Add” operation by passing two, three or four parameters to the method. What will you do if you are using C# 2.0 or 3.0? You will have no other choice than creating as many methods and passing the parameters in this which is known as method overloading.

C#
public int Add(int a, int b);
public int Add(int a, int b, int c);
public int Add(int a, int b, int c, int d);

If you are using C# 4.0, just forget about method overloading by using the optional parameter. Optional parameter is a default value passed to the method signature. Let us go for modifying our previous example to use optional parameter.

C#
public int Add(int a, int b, int c = 0, int d = 0);

Here, we are passing default values to the parameters “c” and “d”. Hence, you can call this method as per your requirement like this:

C#
Add(10, 20); // 10 + 20 + 0 + 0
Add(10, 20, 30); // 10 + 20 + 30 + 0
Add(10, 20, 30, 40); // 10 + 20 + 30 + 40

In the first case, it will pass ‘0’ (zero) as the optional parameter c and d, in the second case, the fourth parameter will be treated as ‘0’ (zero) and in the third case all the parameters are available with proper values.

Now, let us think that we have a situation where we are creating an account of a user with the method named “CreateAccount” which has a non-optional parameter “Name” and two optional parameters “Address” & “Age”. Here in some scenario, you want to pass only the “Name” and “Age”, how can you pass them? Just think about it.

C#
public void CreateAccount(string name, string address = "unknown", int age = 0);

Are you thinking of calling the method with an empty string or null value to the “Address” parameter? Oh, not really. There comes another new feature of C# 4.0 called as “Named Parameter”. Using this, you can call the method with proper name resolution or even you can change the position of the parameter while calling the method. Have a look into the following code example:

C#
CreateAccount("Kunal", age: 28);
CreateAccount(address: "India", name: "Kunal");

The first example shows calling the method without the middle parameter “Address” and the second example demonstrates calling the same method after changing the position of the parameter in the parameter list using the name of the parameter. In this way, you can create a single method with Named & Optional Parameter instead of overloading it several times and use it everywhere you need as per your requirement. This gives more cleaner code with less efforts. Enjoy working with this. Cheers!

This article was originally posted at http://kunal2383.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
Technical Lead
India India

Kunal Chowdhury is a former Microsoft "Windows Platform Development" MVP (Most Valuable Professional, 2010 - 2018), a Codeproject Mentor, Speaker in various Microsoft events, Author, passionate Blogger and a Senior Technical Lead by profession.

He is currently working in an MNC located in India. He has a very good skill over XAML, C#, Silverlight, Windows Phone, WPF and Windows app development. He posts his findings, articles, tutorials in his technical blog (www.kunal-chowdhury.com) and CodeProject.


Books authored:


Connect with Kunal on:





Comments and Discussions

 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
aamarnathshetty31-Aug-12 2:06
aamarnathshetty31-Aug-12 2:06 
GeneralGood one Pin
thatraja29-Jan-12 9:39
professionalthatraja29-Jan-12 9:39 
GeneralSimple, but good Pin
Chad Strawinski30-Mar-10 5:19
Chad Strawinski30-Mar-10 5:19 
GeneralRe: Simple, but good Pin
Kunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 5:26
professionalKunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 5:26 
GeneralMy vote of 3ish Pin
EngleA30-Mar-10 3:32
EngleA30-Mar-10 3:32 
First, I don't think the "add" example is a very good one. I don't know about you, but when I'm adding numbers on a calculator, i'm adding a lot more than just 4 at one time. BUT, I understand the example to demonstrate optional parameters.

Second, named parameters, I like and don't like (and this isn't your fault unless you designed this for MS). I like it for simple tasks for something like private methods where you have to compare dates or reformat a string or something like that, i don't have a good example. But for your human resources example, it's ineffective and completely backwards in the world of OOP. If your using this example in the Enterprise, I'd fire you. Creating a method like AddEmployee(string name, string address, string city, string state, string zip, string phone, string gender, string....) is just plain stupid. D'Oh! | :doh: AddEmployee(Employee emp) is a much better way. Thumbs Up | :thumbsup: THIS is where named parameters may hit a high note...naming custom objects to be passed into the method or something like that.

Interesting though. I had not heard of either of these features until i read your article.

My vote is based on your examples only. good article...it's readable (most here aren't) and I got the jist of what you were saying and learned something.
GeneralRe: My vote of 3ish Pin
Kunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 4:47
professionalKunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 4:47 
GeneralTrue power Pin
NickThissen22-Mar-10 11:14
NickThissen22-Mar-10 11:14 
GeneralRe: True power Pin
mathomp330-Mar-10 2:30
mathomp330-Mar-10 2:30 
GeneralRe: True power Pin
Kunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 4:25
professionalKunal Chowdhury «IN»30-Mar-10 4:25 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.