|
I just edited a question in Q&A where someone was SHOUTING all the way through the question, so I decided to make all letters that didn't need to be uppercase to lowercase, which took a little while since I had to type every single word in lowercase.
Therefore, I think it would be nice to have a button that makes all letters in the selected word(s) lowercase, to ease this process in the future. Kristian Sixhoej
"You can always become better." - Tiger Woods
|
|
|
|
|
You could have just copy/pasted the code into Visual Studio, used the functionality in the editor (Ctrl+U), and then copy/pasted back to the message. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, I didn't think of that.
But still, it would be nice to have this functionality in the editor here. Kristian Sixhoej
"You can always become better." - Tiger Woods
|
|
|
|
|
You have far, far more patience than me if you are willing to edit a question shouted. I tip my hat to you. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Participant points in Professional Profile (or Who's who) are showing wrong data for everyone.
It looks like, apart from signing up 100 points(or any other newsletter points), the participant point calculation of adding 1 point on per day login has started from Yesterday.
P.S.: Reputation graph shows correct participant points for everyone. Issue is only in Professional Profile page.
|
|
|
|
|
Verified. I see it too..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Just noticed it myself and was about to post a bug when I noticed you had already done so.
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got it. We'll have this fixed soon cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I did another run but it looks like we didn't catch the sign-in point properly, again. We have these points in the system, but our totals are out of sync. I'll get this correct today using a less burdensome method than a full rep-recalculation.
Sorry about this.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No issues!
It's just that CP should be aware of it... infact out here looks like you are already on it!
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed right now that the "View All Question" or Latest in Q&A is not getting latest data. (Though might be some caching thing, but does not look like) Few hours old data sitting there.
P.S.: Though 'Unanswered section' is working fine and has latest data.
UPDATE1: Looks like a bigger issue. Data is getting updated for 'All questions' but filtered. Lots of questions are missing that are being asked and answered. Definelty not a caching issue now.
UPDATE2: I found a new link "Show Viewed/Hide Viewed" link at the top of page. This was the culprit for me! modified on Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Can we have this 'Show/Hide Viewed' link default to Show all for now? This would help in having the same look and feel to everyone that they are used to. Hidden by default for now make it look confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Done cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Done? DONE?!
Not adding stuff to the infamous TODO list these days?
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. In weekends, things get done, not added to some list.
|
|
|
|
|
It was working fine 10 min ago, currently when I opened few questions, i got "Sorry, the item you requested could not be found" or "Unfortunately the page you requested was not found"
I refreshd my page to get latest Questions, i get: "Sorry, there is no question for this section"
UPDATE:
Looks like its back to normal.
Might be someone want to know/see what happened!?modified on Sunday, March 14, 2010 3:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
It could have been site backups causing extra load cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers! That solves it all, as long as CP are aware of things... no issues!
|
|
|
|
|
Are you planning on making the Who's Who pages sortable by the rep categories?
|
|
|
|
|
(And by total reputation).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anything like total reputation anymore? It does not look like. Categorized only.modified on Sunday, March 14, 2010 4:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
It would seem only on the reputation graph, with the All Reputation Types value, don't know if it does anything though.
|
|
|
|
|
The total showed in the graph is correct..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Ye... its just that what role does that total play? As it doesn't look like we have any overall membership anymore. Looks like just a total for now!
|
|
|
|
|
It keeps us from having to total it ourselves. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|