|
Rod Kemp wrote: How does someone now increase their editor rep if they can't edit?
This is something which someone from CP needs to clarify! I too am waiting to get reply for this...
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: I too am waiting to get reply for this
I think we all are. 
|
|
|
|
|
Rod Kemp wrote: How does someone now increase their editor rep if they can't edit?
Indeed....45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
so your author/editor status is insufficient he.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently FAQ[^] says:
silver
◦Author
◦Authority
◦Editor
◦Organiser
can edit.
It looks like i qualify, but i am unable to edit any question,answer,pending article, etc. What say?
|
|
|
|
|
And I'm saying this locks out a lot of members that SHOULD be able to edit/delete. I suspect it's an unintended side-effect, but I'm gonna wait until Chris says otherwise before I start posting less-than-favorable comments..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
My Organiser rank is platinum, so I should be able to edit and delete some posts in Quick Answers. Oddly enough, I don't have any of the links available. My article moderations have vanished as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there's something wrong! My editor rep is virtually non existant and only silver as author, yours appears to be similar.
I'll reserve further comment until Chris posts back!Dave
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
My best guess is:
1. the old status is still used in lots of places (it sure still is mentioned all around);
2. everyone's old status value has vanished.
I do not understand how that is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
This looks like it is blocking article publishing entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
| No cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A wee upgrade featurette there mate?"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that I can't view pending articles either. What are the criteria that I should aim for?
|
|
|
|
|
It should be fixed. I can see them..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I am still not 
Looks like the permission relaxation for this feature is still out of my reach.
What is the minimum reputation needed, any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know anymore, and I haven't seen the requirements posted anywhere (doesn't mean they're not posted, just means I haven't seen them if they are)..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I haven't seen the requirements posted anywhere (doesn't mean they're not posted, just means I haven't seen them if they are).
Nicely put!
Might be, someone else has an idea and tells us then!
|
|
|
|
|
No, my homepage is completely devoid of anything to do with article approvals. It seems that the criteria have been made more stringent in that respect
|
|
|
|
|
The criteria is for Gold authors, not just gold 'anything'. We did this so that someone who is, say, a gold partipant (a big chatter box!) but has no expertise in articles will not be able to moderate content.
We tried to juggle the numbers a little to ensure most people who were gold continued to be gold as authors, but in the end a few (including your unfortunate self) missed out. You're close - just not quite there.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Got it 
Hope to get that priviledge soon then!
|
|
|
|
|
| So how does that fit with those of us who have already been enrolled in the Mentors group, even though we did not have the correct author ranking? txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: So how does that fit with those of us who have already been enrolled in the Mentors group
It will fit.
I am grabbing a crowbar (tyirelever in some parts of the world) and will make it fit.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The memebership status is now showing various reputation types with their membership levels - which is very cool.
Taking cue from the suggestion posted just below , I was just wondering if points could be displayed along with their reputation types in the Professional Profile (at least when you hover the tooltip over the various types)?Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 6:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
There is already something useful on hover of the reputations of individuals Profession Profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: There is already something useful on hover of the reputations of individuals Profession Profile.
Yes, I noticed that. But then, there can always be more information inside the tooltip.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
