|
| They should be up soon cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
I have only 45 points  , but CG still has 160176 points 
|
|
|
|
|
We're recalculating.
Patience.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok sure. But here one suggestion, you can display a message like "Reputation graph Recalculating" in the graph, till you finish the recalculation.I guess it's not an expensive process. thanks chris
|
|
|
|
|
That's not really reasonable. If they did that, the whole site would be peppered with "hold on, we're recalculating" messages. The site is a livinhg thing and updates are happening on a continuous basis (most of the time, without us being any the wiser)..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think he meant to show the message all over the site.
Might be just on the Reputation chart, (after loading icon)...a message is shown if such thing is happening. Few might know and understand but new people might report on continuous basis that something is wrong! (but only if this happens quite often! which i think won't! ) ... so aal izz well 
|
|
|
|
|
My point is, every time CP people will be post the messages(Reputation chart bug) in "Site Bugs / Suggestions" like me while recalculation. Till date i have seen the recalculation 4 times. so that's why i was posted that suggestion. thanks john.
|
|
|
|
|
maybe the better suggestion is to keep the existing data alive until the new data is available, then replace old by new in a snap. That may mean creating new tables in the database, then rename some.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems having some problem with "Participant" Reputation Type Calculation, Which includes - Competition Winner 500,MVP Status 1000, Newsletter opt-in 50 Sign in, and Sign -UP.
And My Participant Point showing 1224.
I thing this is wrong 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris is aware of this thing. I had reported the same earlier.
Script for calculating reputation is still running. Lets wait and see the final thing. 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. ! It Looks Updating.
|
|
|
|
|
Issue still persists! 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes !! 
|
|
|
|
|
As per Chris, Competition winner points have been moved to 'Author'. Check there, does it look like reflecting? Mine not. 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think so, I can account for each of my author points without any competition wins being involved.
I did discover votes 4 and 5 are considered "up-votes", 1 and 2 "down-votes" and 3 gets completely ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
It would be little difficult to count, but will give it a try sometime! 
|
|
|
|
|
It's difficult to count over there
|
|
|
|
|
Why did you edit my tip, and what exactly did you change?
The tip in question: Windows Service Gotcha[^]
(I don't like my stuff being molested without a good reason.).45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like small formatting updates. Names of files wrapped in EM instead of CODE tags etc.
I think she's just trying to make your work even more perfect.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Looks like small formatting updates. Names of files wrapped in EM instead of CODE tags etc.
I don't even use EM tags. I wonder how they got there to begin with...
Chris Maunder wrote: I think she's just trying to make your work even more perfect.
One wouldn't think that was possible. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Use the version compare feature to see what was changed. I took a quick look and she changed some minor things like :
windows to Windows
.Net to .NET
They are both valid though pedantic corrections
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: They are both valid though pedantic corrections
Pedentry? On codeproject? Who would have guessed! 
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
|
|
|
|
|
Hi John,
I hope you are aware Chris & Co have meticulously chosen Deeksha to edit your tip; as you can read here[^], she enjoys doing that to you:
Editing articles written by smart and experienced programmers on The Code Project is a job she loves and it keeps her updated on the latest technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
I deleted an original post, and then deleted the answer to it, and got this error:
Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Ticket: 2144851. Server: Web17
EDIT ================
The problem is that the Delete link remains on the page even after the original message has been deleted..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Sunday, March 7, 2010 10:10 AM
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
