|
I didn't think you guys would go for "Strike 1 - Send a hit squad out to take care of business.".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
| It would certainly be simpler... cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
And cheaper. You figure one guy getting paid $5000 for the act, plus travel, lodging, and meal reimbursement would be cheaper than paying a programmer to make the necessary changes.  .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
just send a few of these[^]
and lets move on
|
|
|
|
|
After strike 1, the "user" will right away create a new account. I'd simply recommend that the IP needs to be verified, and the user be IP banned in case of repeat violations of the terms.
Care needs to be taken to check if there are other legit users using the same IP (working for a same company?).
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
That's all fine for static IP's but alot of users can have dynamic IP's (I have at home) so they can just change it when they want.
+ the IP that is being banned is then given to someone else and there is a chance that that person is also a member here and finds himself blocked for no good reason. K it's a very small chance but it could happen
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: the IP needs to be verified
Rajesh: How does the cybercell of our police work? I believe they don't just depend upon IP addresses but verify with the ISPs en route as well. This should also help out to weed out bad apples however a good amount of homework needs to be done to cover multiple laws.Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd suggest to strike 1 (or maybe a strike 0) a simple visual change - say the change to the icon, for 7 days. Nothing else.
Won't help against those to clueless to notice they are misbehaving, and won't help against those with malicous intent. But t5here might be a miniscule amount of teens that just haven't learnt manners - and still haven't had some fundamental physics lesson - earth revoles around the sun, not them. Suspending them will enrange them, close them out, and stimulate creating more accounts and "slashing back".
A pestilence "mark" on the icon makes it immediatekly visible to us - and maybe easier to ignore.
Chris might even throw in an option hiding thir posts. Which gives me an idea: Just hide their posts for everyone else. So they have their playground, can post their crap, but only they will see it. Muhahahahahahahaaa!
Just a little overly optimistic social theory. From a geek.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: the current crop of retards is decimating the C# forum.
Isn't that a requirement for using C#?  You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I think I've fixed these. Will do an update today or tomorrow cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There is 2009, should be 2010
|
|
|
|
|
| Oopsie daisy. Thanks Petr! Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
The title's are correct now but in the description there is still 2009
This is the voting form for the Best ASP.NET article of January 2009 competition. Below are a list of the top 10 articles submitted last month. Please choose the ones you consider your favourite. Remember - you can only vote once!
|
|
|
|
|
| Fixed! Should be good until next year. Hopefully at that time we'll get it right. Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) we can always just pretend it's still 2009 and throw a huge party
|
|
|
|
|
 Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
bahar3 [^] troll is spamming the C# forum (and, I suspect, he is also surreptitiously enriching uranium  ).
Please ban him.If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
| And this guy[^] is encouraginging him/her. I suspect the first one is sima3(?) who was kicked off two days ago. MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
| Thanks mate. It is very irritating!! Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thanks cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
The forum looks really messed up. I browsed through the first few pages to see if there's any interesting query, and all I see is this nonsense!
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
Agreed. It just does not look good.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
The home page lists some survey's for best article's of January 2009 ?
Shouldn't that be 2010?
The description also says 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
I already posted it two posts below this one.
Here ^[^]"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
