|
I need to have direct access to a set of unique keys two ways. First of all each unique key is a composite item. That is each key is composed of 3 items key::[A/B/C]. I need to be able to access each unique key, but I also need to access specific subsets [A/B/*] which would contain [A/B/C1], [A/B/C2], etc. Any suggestions on how to best do this? Currently I'm using a hash container to do the unique key accessing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. I'll look into that.
|
|
|
|
|
Back in the day, when I used Visual Studio on Windows, you could break on any exceptions or abrupt termination. With Netbeans and Linux C++ development, however, it seems like I have 3 options: Pass and continue (terminates the program), discard and stop, discard and continue. None of these do anything remotely useful. Discard and continue is probably the most useful one, in that it lets you keep on going until you hit a segmentation fault. My goal is to figure out which line of code is causing the initial SIGABRT.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
No idea about Netbeans (frankly, this is the first time I've heard anybody is using that for C++ development), but you can set gdb to stop on a signal here are the instructions[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I guess you can do this if you use GDB from the command line, but too bad it doesn't work well from the debugger frontend. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll see if there's anything else that can be done.
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: frankly, this is the first time I've heard anybody is using that for C++ development
Second time (I used just a bit).
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having some trouble getting PC Lint up and running. I'm working on a massive project (several hundred megs of code).
The source is organized into many directories. These directories are then included in the Visual Studio project. Is there any way to import that list of included directories (there's a good 50 or 60 of them)?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I know this is a problem about RoboHelp but most of the help about RoboHelp is fortecnical authors using it not programmers! Perhaps someone here can help?
I am trying to Link RoboHelp7 into my Visual Studio 2005 project (VC++) and I get errors. I have added "wininet.lib; urlmon.lib; htmlhelp.lib" to my Additional Dependencies in the Linker section of the Project Settings and yet this is the error when I try to compile:-
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'wininet.lib;'
Is there another setting that I need to change in the Linker so that it can find the file, or do I need to download the files from somewhere?
Any ideas?
Many Thanks,
Ali
|
|
|
|
|
Alison Pentland wrote: LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'wininet.lib;'
This just means it cannot find the file. Have you added the directory location to the "Additional Library Directories" of the Linker.General section of the project properties?
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the reply.
I agree, it can't find 'wininet.lib'. I searched my harddisk, found a copy and added the path to "Additional Library Directories".
This is the path on my PC "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\PlatformSDK\Lib"
I still get the same error.
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'wininet.lib;'
Thanks for your time, any more ideas gratefully received ... beats me why it can't find the file, its driving me nuts!
Thanks,
Ali
|
|
|
|
|
Alison - what I usually resort to in a case like this is to use Process Monitor to see where the linker's looking for the offending library (look for FILE NOT FOUND messages in its output) - that usually gives clues as to why the linker's not finding the library.
However, in this case...I notice you put a semi-colon delimited list into Additional Dependencies - I think you'll find that you don't want the semi-colons...just whitespace.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
 Stuart Dootson wrote: I notice you put a semi-colon delimited list into Additional Dependencies
Oh, thank you, you are right. What made me put the ;'s in I don't know, I think it maybe a throw back to some old compiler I used to use, and once I had typed them they looked so right I would never have noticed they were wrong.
It still doesn't link completely but it now finds 'wininet.lib'. So I have a new error, but perhaps I can fix this one on my own!
Thanks Again, 
(PS I've never used Process Manager, but I will take a look, sounds handy. )
Ali
|
|
|
|
|
Congratulations!
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Was a surprise, as I've not been too active on CP for a while!
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
MVP for 2010 - who'd'a thunk it!
|
|
|
|
|
But I had mentioned it[^] clearly while you were very active. Overall, I think it's a well deserved award for you.
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
MVP for 2010 - who'd'a thunk it!
|
|
|
|
|
You're the best. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
I second what Rajesh said. You deserve it. Well done
Best wishes,
Navaneeth
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can just insert it after the item above where you want to insert it. You are not limited to the TVI_* positions.
You may be right
I may be crazy
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
i need to insert item in a selected position
eg: if i have tree having one root and five child i need to add new item in the 3rd position but now i can only add it as a first or last item in my child (1st or 6th).
|
|
|
|
|
Get the HTREEITEM handle of the second item, and use it as the hInsertAfter parameter.
You may be right
I may be crazy
-- Billy Joel --
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying to disable a submenu in win32. It's working ok, but is there an alternative to this:
HMENU showMenu = GetSubMenu(currentMenu,2);
EnableMenuItem(showMenu,4,MF_BYPOSITION | MF_GRAYED);
I don't like MF_BYPOSITION, because the code will break if we add new menu items to 'showMenu' later on. Why do sub-menus not have ID's, so that I could just call EnableMenuItem() directly...?
Thanks!
/lacla
|
|
|
|
|
Why not use MF_BYCOMMAND against the id of the menuitem you want disabled?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
