|
Two things I would check are if you have a firewall, if the proper ports are open (1433). Other would be if the sql server is listening on 1433 on a public IP address and internal address.
Byron Mann
mannb@hostmysite.com
byronosity@gmail.com
Software Architect
hosting.com | hostmysite.com
http://www.hostmysite.com/?utm_source=bb
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Sorry. Iam zero in this Sql Servers. This my first Project. So can you explain a bit more.
1.Yes. I have a firewall. But how can i understand my ports are open 1433? Any commands....?
2.How can i check my Sqlserver is listening on 1433 on public IP address and internal address..
Can you provide any sample commands?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
From the server access SQL outside your local network, to tell if the outside server can connect to the port.
From the command line ->telnet SqlServerHostname 1433
If it connects it will blank screen. Hit ctrl+] to escape; otherwise it will just sit there "Connecting to sqlserverhostname" and eventually time out and return you to the command prompt.
On the sql server from the command line issue this command
>netstat -an
sift through the list and look for this in the second column
PublicIP:1433
208.208.208.208:1433 for example, that first column is the ip and ports your server is listening on.
|
|
|
|
|
Use TCP/IP Provider instead of named pipes.
Regards,
Aman
|
|
|
|
|
I have two tables and 3 columns in each table.Each column contains 5 rows
T1-- T2--
c1 c2 c3 b1 b2 b3
1 6 11 a b c
2 7 12 d e f
3 8 13 g h i
4 9 14 j k l
5 10 15 m n o
I want data as
Final Table
c1 b2
1 b
2 e
3 h
4 k
5 n
Please suggest solution for this. I have to show this in gridview.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you using winforms DataGridView or webforms GridView.
If it is GridView then you need to take this question to the ASP forum.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
What are the column names, and how does the data in the two tables link to each other? It looks like you are grabbing the first column of the first table and the second column of the second table, so if these are in a database and you are trying to pull the data it will look something like this:
SELECT Table1Column1, Table2Column2 FROM Table 1 JOIN Table 2 ON Table1KeyColumn=Table2KeyColumn
Is this what you were looking for?
|
|
|
|
|
I've created a stored procedure which retrives a list of worklogs for a specific week, log time is added together, joined to user table based on UserID and then returned as HoursWorked.
This worked fine as the following code:
ALTER procedure [dbo].[GetAllUsersWhoHaventSubmittedTimeForWeek]
(
@MinimumHours float,
@EndDate datetime,
@AmountOfDaysBack int
)
as
begin
SELECT u.Email, u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName AS Usersname, round(sum(WorkDone) / 60, 1)
FROM Users u LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
select sum(WorkDone) WorkDone, UserId UserId, WorkUnitTypeId WorkUnitTypeId
FROM worklog
WHERE WorkLogDateTime >= dateadd(d, -@AmountOfDaysBack, @EndDate) and WorkLogDateTime <= dateadd(d, 1, @EndDate)
GROUP BY UserID, WorkUnitTypeId
HAVING round(sum(WorkDone) / 60, 1) < @MinimumHours
) w
ON u.UserId=w.UserId
WHERE u.userid not in (SELECT User_ID FROM ReportUsers WHERE Status = 0) and u.isactive = 1
GROUP BY w.UserId, u.FirstName, u.LastName, u.Email, WorkUnitTypeId
ORDER BY sum(WorkDone) DESC
END
I then realised WorkDone can sometimes store hours, days or weeks and is defined in 'WorkUnitTypeID' so I added a CASE statement to the Select:
ALTER procedure [dbo].[GetAllUsersWhoHaventSubmittedTimeForWeek]
(
@MinimumHours float,
@EndDate datetime,
@AmountOfDaysBack int
)
as
begin
SELECT u.Email, u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName AS Usersname,
CASE w.WorkUnitTypeId
WHEN 1 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone / 60),1), 0) --Minutes
WHEN 2 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone),1), 0) --Hours
WHEN 3 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone * 24),1), 0) --Days
WHEN 4 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone * 168),1), 0) --Weeks
ELSE 0
END WorkDone
FROM Users u LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
select sum(WorkDone) WorkDone, UserId UserId, WorkUnitTypeId WorkUnitTypeId
FROM worklog
WHERE WorkLogDateTime >= dateadd(d, -@AmountOfDaysBack, @EndDate) and WorkLogDateTime <= dateadd(d, 1, @EndDate)
GROUP BY UserID, WorkUnitTypeId
HAVING round(sum(WorkDone) / 60, 1) < @MinimumHours
) w
ON u.UserId=w.UserId
WHERE u.userid not in (SELECT User_ID FROM ReportUsers WHERE Status = 0) and u.isactive = 1
GROUP BY w.UserId, u.FirstName, u.LastName, u.Email, WorkUnitTypeId
ORDER BY sum(WorkDone) DESC
END
Again this worked but presented a new issue, the procedure now returns multiple rows for the same user but for each of the WorkUnitTypeID - instead of adding them together.
I'm new to SQL in general and have that feeling I've missed something really simple! Any feedback would be much appreciated.
Tommy
|
|
|
|
|
Try replacing
GROUP BY w.UserId, u.FirstName, u.LastName, u.Email, WorkUnitTypeId by
Group by u.Email, u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName,
CASE w.WorkUnitTypeId
WHEN 1 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone / 60),1), 0) --Minutes
WHEN 2 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone),1), 0) --Hours
WHEN 3 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone * 24),1), 0) --Days
WHEN 4 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(w.WorkDone * 168),1), 0) --Weeks
ELSE 0
END
Wout Louwers
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply but no joy:
Cannot use an aggregate or a subquery in an expression used for the group by list of a GROUP BY clause.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry,
My mistake. Try this group by clause:
Group by u.Email, u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName
Wout Louwers
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone else offer any more on this? Sorry for the spam but it's quite urgent. I've tried playing about with it more by placing the case inside the JOIN - which I got my hopes up about but still the same result of recieving multiple user rows with different worklogs 
ALTER procedure [dbo].[GetAllUsersWhoHaventSubmittedTimeForWeek]
(
@MinimumHours float,
@EndDate datetime,
@AmountOfDaysBack int
)
as
begin
SELECT u.Email,
u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName AS Usersname,
w.WorkDone
from Users u LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
Select UserID,
WorkUnitTypeId,
CASE WorkUnitTypeId
WHEN 1 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone / 60),1), 0) --Minutes
WHEN 2 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone),1), 0) --Hours
WHEN 3 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone * 24),1), 0) --Days
WHEN 4 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone * 168),1), 0) --Weeks
ELSE 0
END as WorkDone
FROM worklog
WHERE WorkLogDateTime >= dateadd(d, -@AmountOfDaysBack, @EndDate) and WorkLogDateTime <= dateadd(d, 1, @EndDate)
--HAVING round(sum(WorkDone) / 60, 1) < @MinimumHours
GROUP BY UserId,
WorkUnitTypeId
) w
ON u.UserId=w.UserId
WHERE u.userid not in (SELECT User_ID FROM ReportUsers WHERE Status = 0) and u.isactive = 1
GROUP BY w.UserId,
u.FirstName,
u.LastName,
u.Email,
WorkUnitTypeId,
WorkDone
ORDER BY sum(WorkDone) DESC
END
|
|
|
|
|
Try this
ALTER procedure [dbo].[GetAllUsersWhoHaventSubmittedTimeForWeek]
(
@MinimumHours float,
@EndDate datetime,
@AmountOfDaysBack int
)
as
begin
SELECT u.Email,
u.FirstName + ' ' + u.LastName AS Usersname,
w.WorkDone
from Users u LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
Select UserID,
Sum(CASE WorkUnitTypeId
WHEN 1 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone / 60),1), 0) --Minutes
WHEN 2 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone),1), 0) --Hours
WHEN 3 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone * 24),1), 0) --Days
WHEN 4 THEN ISNULL(round(sum(WorkDone * 168),1), 0) --Weeks
ELSE 0
END) as WorkDone
FROM worklog
WHERE WorkLogDateTime >= dateadd(d, -@AmountOfDaysBack, @EndDate) and WorkLogDateTime <= dateadd(d, 1, @EndDate)
--HAVING round(sum(WorkDone) / 60, 1) < @MinimumHours
GROUP BY UserId
) w
ON u.UserId=w.UserId
WHERE u.userid not in (SELECT User_ID FROM ReportUsers WHERE Status = 0) and u.isactive = 1
GROUP BY w.UserId,
u.FirstName,
u.LastName,
u.Email,
WorkUnitTypeId,
WorkDone
ORDER BY sum(WorkDone) DESC
END
|
|
|
|
|
[deleted]
Got it working! Bascilly deleted it and started again and managed to get it working from the advice you both gave (Wrapping the case in a sum and removing Workunittypeid from the top level group by).
Thanks for the help - first and last stored procedure I attempt 
modified on Thursday, August 6, 2009 5:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
How we can design a database tables that record hierarchical data. The levels of hierarchy are not fixed. For example:
Table Header:
A B C D E F G SomeOtherHeader
Respective record:
1 4 3 2 6 t a PK_of_Another_Table
2 3 4 6 8 y a PK_of_Another_Table
Now the record has upto Level "G" with different values. But it can be up to different level for another block of record.
So what is best relational implementation of this Dynamic Hierarchy?
Please refer any link that is worth reading related to this topic.
Thanks.
Good Day.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am developping ASP.NET 2008. My data is stored in SQL server 2008.
The problem is when I query, I got 0 records and this is because the data is stored in hebrew.
I tried to change the collation property in Column of the table but it doesn't help
Please help
Shay Noy
|
|
|
|
|
Hi--can you post your code so we can see if it might be something with that?
|
|
|
|
|
Private Function GetPathPicturesFromDb(ByVal Period As String, ByVal Location As String) As String
Dim ds As New DataSet("Pictures")
Dim strSQL As String = "SELECT FullFileName FROM PicturesTable " & _
"WHERE PERIOD='" & Period & "' " & _
"AND LOCATION='" & Location & "'"
Dim sqlConnection As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("MemberShipConnectionString").ConnectionString)
sqlConnection.Open()
Dim da As New SqlDataAdapter()
da.SelectCommand = New SqlCommand(strSQL, sqlConnection)
da.Fill(ds)
If ds.Tables(0).Rows.Count > 0 Then _
Return ds.Tables(0).DefaultView(0).Row("FullFileName").ToString.Trim
Return ""
End Function
The Location field contains hebrew words and when I am querying by changing the database content in english it works perfectly with the same code I post upstair. So I am sure that the problem is because the hebrew. I need to config anywhere that the Location column can contain hebrew characters. Again, I success to insert hebrew words in the databse but when I am querying no records are found
Thanks
Shay Noy
|
|
|
|
|
shaynoy wrote: The problem is when I query, I got 0 records and this is because the data is stored in hebrew.
How do you know that is the problem? AFAIK, if table has records, query will return irrespective of the type of data. Are you sure the table has records? What data type are you using for keeping values?
|
|
|
|
|
This is a new table that I insert record in it and yes I am sure there are records and i am sure that my query is OK. I just need to know how to config the column that store hebrew characters to get abiility for query on it
Shay Noy
|
|
|
|
|
hi guys please help me.
while connecting to oracle database it shows the following error.
The ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
i tried to login from command prompt..
c:\sqlplus/nolog
sql:\connect sys/manager as sysdba
but is throws error:- "insufficient privileges".
cannot connect to Database.....
i restarted all oracle services.
but the same error continues.....
from last 2 days it is showing the same error.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you logged onto OS as owner of Oracle software?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to load(import) data from my non-unicode database backup files to Unicode database instance in SQL Server 2005.
How to achieve the above requirement? if anyone knows the steps, it would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sadhik
|
|
|
|
|
Try googling for Sql Server 2005 DTS
|
|
|
|
|
Error: saving tester - TST-000-341 - item :: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid column name 'TST'.
update tbl_swbom_checklist_testers set passfail='No' where package=992-700-358 and tester=TST-000-341
That is part of the exception thrown by my web app. There is no column named TST, the column is named TESTER, which is why the SQL statement is 'where tester=TST-000-341'. The PACKAGE column is the same syntax and it has no complaints. What am I missing here? Here is my entire SP:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_UpdateTesterColumn
(
@PACKAGE nvarchar(255),
@TESTER nvarchar(100),
@COLUMN nvarchar(100),
@VALUE nvarchar(100),
@LASTCHANGEBY nvarchar(100)
)
AS
declare @sql nvarchar(1024)
set @sql=''
set @sql=@sql+'update tbl_swbom_checklist_testers set '+@COLUMN+'='''+@VALUE+''' '
set @sql=@sql+'where tester='+convert(nvarchar(100),@tester)+' and package='+convert(nvarchar(255),@package)
print @sql
exec sp_executesql @sql
GO
Obviously the print is when I uncomment the print statement. What am I missing here?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
