|
If you have placed an activex control on a dialog or form, you can map the events using class wizard. Start classwizard Ctrl+W and goto the "ActiveX events" tab. From there you should be able to choose which you want to map.
Roger Allen
Sonork 100.10016
I think I need a new quote, I am on the prowl, so look out for a soft cute furry looking animal, which is really a Hippo in disguise. Its probably me.
|
|
|
|
|
When use CInternetSession::OpenURL in a seperate thread,for example:
CStdioFile* pFile=CInternetSession::OpenURL(...)
If this thread for some reason is terminated suddenly,VC will detedct a memory leak:
Detected memory leaks!<br />
Dumping objects -><br />
{202} normal block at 0x003478D8, 30 bytes long.<br />
Data: < /] > B0 00 2F 5D 0D 00 00 00 0D 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
and because OpenURL have not finished properly,so pFile is still NULL,so we cannot manage to dealocate the memeory by delete pFile.
What should I do? Is it a bug in MFC?
|
|
|
|
|
my guess is that the leak is because of
If this thread for some reason is terminated suddenly,VC will detedct a memory leak
Are u calling TerminateProcess or one of the family??
Papa
while (TRUE)
Papa.WillLove ( Bebe ) ;
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for response.
OpenURL will wait until received the response from server or time out.In a narrow band and slow connection,this may take some time.If the user is weary of waiting and click "Stop" button,I don't want to say "Hi! I'm waiting something from server,don't bother me! I'll stop until I can stop",I just want to stop the thread immediately.But in this way I don't know how to avoid the memory leak.
|
|
|
|
|
You have a couple of options for handling this correctly.
1. Let the thread finish it's work and clean up but make the application ignore the results and pretend like the thread is not running.
2. Use an asynchronous connection to the server which involves a bit more than a simple call to OpenURL, but will get you what you want. You can use this link to read more on ansync connections using CInternetSession[^]
--
If it starts to make sense, you're in a cult.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I need to be able to control the limits that are allowed to type in a CEdit control (ie: if the max number must be smaller than 2000, I need not to be able to type 3000).
OK I know that I can tell the CEdit to be limited by the use of this DDX call:
DDV_MinMaxInt(pDX, m_vediVelocitat, 0, 3000);
OK, I need to be able to modify this limit at runtime, is there an easy way?
All that I've tried gives me an artificial behaviour.
As always, thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you try removing the DDV_MinMaxInt intrcution from the AFX_DATA_MAP section, and replace "3000" by a variable ?
void CMyDialog::DoDataExchange(CDataExchange* pDX)<br />
{<br />
CDialog::DoDataExchange(pDX);<br />
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_MY_EDIT, m_iPos);<br />
DDV_MinMaxInt(pDX, m_iPos, 0, m_iRangeMax);<br />
}
Some of those that work forces
Are the same that burn crosses !
Killing In The Name/Rage Against The Machine
|
|
|
|
|
Do you need that 'on the fly', meaning you want to stop the user from entering eg. one '0' too much, or are you satisfied with the (IMHO stupid, confusing and unsatisfactory)MFC approach of testing after the user has clicked OK?
|
|
|
|
|
MFC tests when you type, that is why it is stupid. If you have a number, highlight it and hit delete, you'll get a validation error. I ALWAYS roll my own validation, so as not to drive my users insane.
Christian
Hey, at least Logo had, at it's inception, a mechanical turtle. VB has always lacked even that... - Shog9 04-09-2002
During last 10 years, with invention of VB and similar programming environments, every ill-educated moron became able to develop software. - Alex E. - 12-Sept-2002
|
|
|
|
|
Christian Graus wrote:
MFC tests when you type
Really? Not only in UpdateData()? This was new to me, it must be limited to CEdit, as all other validations are triggered by UpdateData().
|
|
|
|
|
MFC *doesn't* test until DoDataExchange is called from UpdateData.
Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
*** Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere. ***
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm.... I remember spending ages trying to stop it from popping up all the time, but when I did a quick test, it was not the case. I'm confused now, I wonder what I was doing at the time.....
Christian
Hey, at least Logo had, at it's inception, a mechanical turtle. VB has always lacked even that... - Shog9 04-09-2002
During last 10 years, with invention of VB and similar programming environments, every ill-educated moron became able to develop software. - Alex E. - 12-Sept-2002
|
|
|
|
|
what can I do? I have no time and this will semi-solve my problem, when I'd have finished this machine, I'll try to find out another way...
|
|
|
|
|
I found this
DDX_Check(pDX, IDC_SEX, m_bFemale);
DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_EDIT1, m_age);
if (m_bFemale)
DDV_MinMax(pDX, age, 0, m_maxFemaleAge);
else
DDV_MinMax(pDX, age, 0, m_maxMaleAge);
in the MSDN under "TN026: DDX and DDV Routines".
Seems you can easily use variables.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Joan,
One way would be to derive your own class from CEdit. Add a member variable that holds the maximum value (which you can then dynamically change in your program) and handle the EN_CHANGE or WM_CHAR messages to check whether the modified string is out of range.
I have an example of this but it is at home (it only allows you to type in floating point numbers only). I can send it to you if you wish but I can only do this tonight.
Cheers
Adam.
www.beachwizard.com/travelogue[^]
"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered"
George Best.
|
|
|
|
|
As I have no time, it would be great for me to receive that sample, all of you in codeproject are helping me a lot!
thank you very much!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Joan,
Pop the following .h and .cpp files in your code. It should work (does for me anyway). You might have to play around with the checking of string lengths and conversions to make it more robust but the idea is there.
In class wizard, set the member variable of your edit box as a Control of type CIntEdit (call it m_wndEditBox or something) and then call m_wndEditBox.SetMaxInt(nMax) on the fly whenver you want (pref. initialise it in OnInitDialog in your dialog box, for example as the default is zero).
Note, the minimum acceptable integer value is zero but I am sure you could change the code as you see fit.
Any probs, givvus a shout
Best regards and good luck  ,
Adam.
IntEdit.h
class CIntEdit : public CEdit<br />
{<br />
public:<br />
CIntEdit();<br />
<br />
public:<br />
<br />
public:<br />
<br />
<br />
public:<br />
void SetMaxInt(int nMax);<br />
int GetMaxInt();<br />
virtual ~CIntEdit();<br />
<br />
protected:<br />
int m_nMaxInt;<br />
afx_msg void OnChar(UINT nChar, UINT nRepCnt, UINT nFlags);<br />
<br />
DECLARE_MESSAGE_MAP()<br />
};
IntEdit.cpp
<br />
#include "stdafx.h"<br />
#include "IntEdit.h"<br />
<br />
#ifdef _DEBUG<br />
#define new DEBUG_NEW<br />
#undef THIS_FILE<br />
static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__;<br />
#endif<br />
<br />
<br />
CIntEdit::CIntEdit()<br />
{<br />
m_nMaxInt=0;<br />
}<br />
<br />
CIntEdit::~CIntEdit()<br />
{<br />
}<br />
<br />
<br />
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CIntEdit, CEdit)<br />
ON_WM_CHAR()<br />
END_MESSAGE_MAP()<br />
<br />
<br />
void CIntEdit::OnChar(UINT nChar, UINT nRepCnt, UINT nFlags) <br />
{<br />
const int DEL=8;<br />
if((nChar<'0' || nChar>'9') && nChar!=DEL) return;<br />
CString strWndTxt="", strTemp="",strChar="";<br />
strChar=(TCHAR)nChar;<br />
<br />
int nStartChar=0, nEndChar=0, nLen=0, nVal=0;<br />
GetWindowText(strWndTxt);<br />
nLen=strWndTxt.GetLength()/sizeof(TCHAR);<br />
GetSel(nStartChar,nEndChar);<br />
strTemp=strWndTxt.Left(nStartChar)+strChar+strWndTxt.Right(nLen-nEndChar);<br />
TRACE(strTemp);<br />
<br />
nVal=_ttoi(strTemp);<br />
if(nVal<=m_nMaxInt)<br />
{<br />
CEdit::OnChar(nChar, nRepCnt, nFlags);<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
int CIntEdit::GetMaxInt()<br />
{<br />
return m_nMaxInt;<br />
}<br />
<br />
void CIntEdit::SetMaxInt(int nMax)<br />
{<br />
m_nMaxInt=nMax;<br />
}
www.beachwizard.com/travelogue[^]
"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered"
George Best.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO OnChar is not the correct way to do this as your validation routine is totally bypassed when an entry is copiedpasted in from the clipboard. You are much better off using OnUpdate (EN_UPDATE) to handle validation in edit controls.
CPUA 0x5041
Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little
"So it can now be written in stone as a testament to humanities achievments "PJ did Pi at CP"." Colin Davies
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
You are spot on. I relied on discarding ctrl+V keystrokes but if I right click on the edit box, I have the option to paste in it.
Well spotted!
Adam.
www.beachwizard.com/travelogue[^]
"I spent a lot of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered"
George Best.
|
|
|
|
|
You COULD handle WM_PASTE also, this is where all clipboard pastes end up.
Just GetWindowText() the content into a local variable, call Default(), and validate the pasted text. If you want to revert to the old text you had before the insert, you can SetWindowText() it back from your local variable.
But EN_UPDATE is probably better.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you considered CEdit::SetLimitText?
Never mind. I didn't read your post carefully enough.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
Just replace the constant '3000' with a name of variable containing the dynamic limit:
DDV_MinMaxInt(pDX, m_vediVelocitat, 0, m_maxVelocitat);
Of course, you should set m_maxVelocitat to appropriate value before DoDataExchange is called.
As a side note, you can check 'number' flag in the edit properties invoked in dialog editor. This will block non-digit characters being typed. AFAIR, however, you can still paste anything into numeric edit, so DDV_ call is essential.
Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
*** Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum ***
|
|
|
|
|
Tomasz Sowinski wrote:
As a side note, you can check 'number' flag in the edit properties
And it fails miserably with a negative number. I think it is next to useless, and I would say that MS did not make their homework with regards to Edit controls.
Mostly useless stuff like IP edit YES, but nothing working for integers and floating points - that would give bad ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
jhwurmbach wrote:
And it fails miserably with a negative number.
I've got the impression that Joan is working with some kind of velocity, which probably is non-negative. In this case, ES_NUMBER may be usable, but DDV_ is still required.
Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com
*** Purgamentum init, exit purgamentum ***
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at my article at http://www.codeproject.com/tools/Colour.asp[^]. I use an subclassed edit control that limits the input between 0 and 255 using the EN_UPDATE notification message (NumEdit.cpp and NumEdit.h). This should give you an idea on one method of limiting user input without using DDV_*.
HTH
CPUA 0x5041
Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little
"So it can now be written in stone as a testament to humanities achievments "PJ did Pi at CP"." Colin Davies
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
