|
Sorry mate. I was reading his post below, and then replied to yours. From now on, I declare that all posters are to be referred to as John.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I'd prefer Bruce....
And, the point is that I want to create this thing in code, not in XAML.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
"! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.
I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce is good. Bling is the puppy for you then.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Downloading now, thanks.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
"! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.
I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp
|
|
|
|
|
There is AccelerationRatio and DecelerationRation but they are not that customisable, the next version of WPF and Silverlight support built-in and custom easing functions.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All, I want to show one dialog box when user closes the browser.
I have added the code in Application_Exit :
HtmlPage.Window.Confirm("Do u want to save your data?");
So that It shows me the OK/Cancel box, which is fine for me. But I want the event for YES so that if user says YES then I could save the data and if he says NO then I do not save the data.
Can anybody have any idea????
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pleased that you got the solution to your problem, but could you please refrain from using Urgent in posts. These are volunteer only forums, and people will get to your problem when they have time.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I'll provide a paid support contract 
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi experts,
Is it possible to use silverlight in Windows Forms ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silverlight is a browser plugin. Put a browser control on your form and
hit a page that has a Silverlight control on it
But as mentioned, since Windows Forms is Windows-specific, you can use WPF.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
You can use webbrowser controls in winform and WPF. then, you can show the Silverlight content on that browser control. but why...
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
Microsoft MVP (Silverlight), WPF/Silverlight Insiders
|
|
|
|
|
Do any of the current silverlight versions (1,2 and 3 beta) support Parallel and Multi-core Programming?
|
|
|
|
|
I know nothing of version 1, which is obsolete at this point anyway, but
Silverlight 2+ has a System.Threading namespace with the familiar Thread,
BackgroundWorker, etc. classes.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have developed 2 windows in WPF . In Window1 Window_Loaded i have created the window2 like this so that the window2 controls will be intialized during startup itself
private void Window_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Window Window2 = new Window();
}
And iam only showing the window2 on the button click from window1, but the window2 display takes about 4 to 5 secs.
Is there any thing do be taken care which iam missing.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Without knowing what is done inside Window2 before it's allowed to be displayed, we can't help you.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Is it really a Window ? Not a derived class ? I assume not. Try setting breakpoints in your code to see which part of the process is taking that long.
Christian Graus
Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.
"! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.
I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp
|
|
|
|
|
That Silverlight was meant to be used as the latest web technology but things as basic as making use of forms authentication or membership seems to require that the developer build services that extend these services to the Silverlight application.
It just seems odd that MS would release a product architecture that is meant to replace ASP.NET interfaces but then cause so much extra work to have to be done.
|
|
|
|
|
Silverlight is a browser plugin - nothing more.
Silverlight is not a replacement for ASP.NET, it is (depending on
one's experience) an enhancement.
Silverlight runs on a client. ASP.NET runs on a server.
It makes no sense to build server services into a client technology.
Sure, we'd all like to see the entire .NET framework available in a
browser client....pretty unrealistic though.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
I get all that... it just seems strange (to me) that a technology that was so clearly targeted towards a rich interactive experience requires this effort.
I really seems to look like Silverlight was only meant to take the place of web-parts and other technologies like that, but I am not sure if it has maintained that focus. Sure I could build an ASP.NET site that uses Silverlight components to fill various areas within the page, but I am not sure of the simplicity of that aspect either right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Cassick wrote: seems to look like Silverlight was only meant to take the place of web-parts and other technologies like that, but I am not sure if it has maintained that focus.
Yeah it seems better suited for people like me -
I don't have any ASP.NET experience so the HTML bridge and
javascript stuff is totally greek to me, yet I have no problem writing
the services I need, so for me it's a relatively minimal effort.
That's just from my point of view...
The .NET RIA services should help bridge Silverlight to the ASP.NET back-end stuff -
especially for people like me who don't know ASP.NET....but that's not even in beta
yet - I could really use it NOW
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Silverlight is a client side plugin. Your authentication/membership would be tracked server side in every case I can think of. There is no reason for Silverlight to implement membership-specific functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
I get that, and I am not saying that it has to re-implement it. I am just surprised that MS requires each person that is using SL to develop a web site to have to reinvent the wheel in the way of WCF services that extend the membership functionality instead of just providing (or maybe releasing an enterprise library area) that does it.
|
|
|
|
|
You may want to check RIA service with Silverlight version 3.
Thanks and Regards,
Michael Sync ( Blog: http://michaelsync.net)
Microsoft MVP (Silverlight), WPF/Silverlight Insiders
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
