Re: 'is' operator - C# Discussion Boards

jasper0188-Jun-09 15:16

8-Jun-09 15:16

I do not know if this will work but I know when I use string you have to be careful of slashes and so on so for one you could try:

private void LoadSettings()
{
StreamReader Settings = new StreamReader("Settings.txt");
string line;
while ((line = Settings.ReadLine()) != null)
{
if (line.StartsWith(@"/"))
{
}
else
{
string[] splitArray = line.Split(new char[] { '=' });
MessageBox.Show(splitArray[0]);

}
}
}

The at symbol will ensure it is read as string....

as for getting the strings back together you could use a string builder or just add the values together

string var = (splitArray[0] + " = " + splitArray[1]);

I am not sure if that is the best way to do it. Hope that helps.

Re: Set an arrays items to new strings

Jasmine Pomelo8-Jun-09 15:31

Jasmine Pomelo

8-Jun-09 15:31

Hum im getting System.IndexOutOfRangeException was unhandled
Message="Index was outside the bounds of the array."

i think it might have something to do with splitArray[0] being empty , The line brakes seem to have gotten through

'is' operator

Member 10339078-Jun-09 11:27

Member 1033907

8-Jun-09 11:27

The MSDN on 'is' operator says ...the provided object can be cast to the provided type without causing an exception to be thrown. Suppose I have the following code:

object x = FunctionThatReturnsAnInteger();
if(x is decimal)
    Console.WriteLine("Hello world");

The above condition is never true because x is of type integer, not decimal, but - int can be cast to decimal without an exception being thrown - so why does it not work?

More directly to my problem - what is the fastest (in runtime) way to check, if a variable (of type 'object', in general) can be cast to decimal? I can obviously try this in a try-catch block, but I wonder if there are ways that perform better.

Thanks for sugegstions, H.

Re: 'is' operator

Christian Graus8-Jun-09 11:33

Christian Graus

8-Jun-09 11:33

These are integral types, is only works for classes. This should not compile. The is operator WILL work with a class structure.

class Base
class Derived1 : Base

Derived1 n;

if ( n is Base )
{
// this will work
}

Member 1033907 wrote:
what is the fastest (in runtime) way to check, if a variable (of type 'object', in general) can be cast to decimal?

I suspect you need your try/catch block. You also have the cost of boxing to contend with. You could try calling ToString on the object and then decimal.TryParse, that should work for things like int.

Christian Graus

Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

"! i don't exactly like or do programming and it only gives me a headache." - spotted in VB forums.

I can do things with my brain that I can't even google. I can flex the front part of my brain instantly anytime I want. It can be exhausting and it even causes me vision problems for some reason. - CaptainSeeSharp

Re: 'is' operator

Member 10339078-Jun-09 11:40

Member 1033907

8-Jun-09 11:40

Thanks for your reply.

Christian Graus wrote:
This should not compile.

I compiles fine, 'is' works with structures as well. And besides - 'x' in the previous example is of type 'object', so the compiler has no way of knowing it is going to contain an integer.

Christian Graus wrote:
You could try calling ToString on the object and then decimal.TryParse, that should work for things like int.

String parsing seems to me like the slowest possible approach. I guess I'll go with the try/catch, which is guaranteed to work, unless someone comes with something faster.

Re: 'is' operator

Christian Graus8-Jun-09 11:57

Christian Graus

8-Jun-09 11:57

Member 1033907 wrote:
I compiles fine, 'is' works with structures as well.

I didn't think that was the case. I know I've had 'is' not compile for me before because I used an integral type.

Member 1033907 wrote:
String parsing seems to me like the slowest possible approach

Well, you're already paying the cost of boxing, which is expensive, and talking about try/catch, which is VERY expensive.

Member 1033907 wrote:
I guess I'll go with the try/catch, which is guaranteed to work, unless someone comes with something faster.

I would do some testing to see which is faster.

Re: 'is' operator

Christian Graus8-Jun-09 12:05

Christian Graus

8-Jun-09 12:05

I've got it. It's 'as' that doesn't work, because int cannot be null. But, is and as both rely on an inheritance tree, they do not try to do any sort of conversion between types. decimal does not derive from int, or vice versa, so neither of those will work. You're asking if the type can be converted, not if it is of that type to start with.

Re: 'is' operator

Colin Angus Mackay8-Jun-09 12:54

Colin Angus Mackay

8-Jun-09 12:54

Member 1033907 wrote:
int can be cast to decimal without an exception being thrown - so why does it not work?

Just because you can cast to it does not mean it is part of the same type heirarchy. Types can provide their own casting operators to make coercion to other types easier for the programmer.

is/as only work on things when they are along the same branch of an object heirarchy.

decimal derives from object. int derives from object. Each is heading down different branches.

Man who stand on hill with mouth open wait long time for roast duck to drop in

Re: 'is' operator

PIEBALDconsult8-Jun-09 13:13

PIEBALDconsult

8-Jun-09 13:13

The term "cast" is used to mean two different things, one of which is more like "convert".
When an int is "cast" to decimal it gets converted. The is operator doesn't work with that type of cast.

Killing a process

CodingYoshi8-Jun-09 9:27

CodingYoshi

8-Jun-09 9:27

I wrote an app which creates excel reports. I would like to kill all the excel processes my application started. How do I figure out if my application started the process so I only kill those processes?

I have this code so far:

foreach (Process p in Process.GetProcessesByName("EXCEL"))
{
p.Kill();
}

However, as it is clear from the code, it kills all excel processes.

CodingYoshi

Visual Basic is for basic people, C# is for sharp people. Farid Tarin '07