|
i'm trying to create .net framework using c#.net.
but i don't know top to bottom in .net. any one give idea about
framework. And also give flow for creating .net framework.
i don't know it's possible or not..
if possible give me ur ideas..
Thankyou,,,
R RajaGuru
|
|
|
|
|
What are you wittering on about? Creating the .NET framework in C# - This is a bit of a pointless exercise as you need the .NET framework to run C#.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
You could bootstrap it, starting with a subset of C#, write an embryonic C# compiler, tweak stuff a bit in the early generations, and grow it. That is how nature does things after all. I may take a while though.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: You could bootstrap it, starting with a subset of C#, write an embryonic C# compiler, tweak stuff a bit in the early generations, and grow it. That is how nature does things after all. I may take a while though.
You could. It's still a pointless exercise.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: What are you wittering on about
Did you drop a 'T' or is "wittering" a word I am not familiar with?
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: Did you drop a 'T' or is "wittering" a word I am not familiar with?
Here's[^] one source of usage. Locally, it means to ramble on uselessly.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
British word meaning "talking boring, inconsequential rubbish that nobody is interested in".
So same meaning as twitter, I suspected as much. Could have looked it up myself but it presented an excuse to do some twittering of my own.
|
|
|
|
|
wittering = being witty?
witticising isn't a word yet.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Besides, the .Net Framework was written in Javascript, not C#. It just wouldn't be right...
"A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"
|
|
|
|
|
crrajaguru wrote: but i don't know top to bottom
No kidding.
|
|
|
|
|
The words arse and elbow come to mind here.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
crrajaguru wrote: any one give idea about
framework
I heard they used software to make it.
crrajaguru wrote: And also give flow for creating .net framework
Energy flows from the fingers to the keyboard. And then signals flow from the keyboard to the computer.
crrajaguru wrote: i don't know it's possible or not..
It's not possible. Microsoft specifically designed .NET so that people couldn't program in it. The best we can hope for is using forum software to use it's AI to program it.
|
|
|
|
|
Forgive me if this is a stupid request...
In web apps (classic ASP) I can capture the HTTP_USER_AGENT ServerVariable which reports the complete client browser information, including what .NET Frameworks are installed. Is there any possible way I can capture this (or an equivalent) in a WinForms application (without going to a web server)? Basically what I'm after is a complete list of all the .NET Frameworks installed and the HTTP_USER_AGENT seemed to be my best bet.
Thanks... Steve
|
|
|
|
|
Not a stoopid request at all. Start here[^]
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if there was any way to toggle the enabled states of the check boxes on a node by node basis?
I've tried handling the events but they won't stop the check box checking if it's clicked repeatedly.
Cheers
Tris
-------------------------------
Carrier Bags - 21st Century Tumbleweed.
|
|
|
|
|
I recently reinstalled VS 2005 and after that, a dialog would come up when I started MS Word. It said "the feature you are using is on the VS 2005 CD and must be installed" (or something to that effect). Naturally, MS can't tell you what bleeping feature I'm supposedly using (all I had done was to start up Word). Then it takes 10 minutes or more to install this "feauture" after I supply the disk and still never tells me WTF it did. This happened the other day on another MS product - I think it was Expression Web - and it was the same story: no indication of what "feature" I was using and a long install (about 20 minutes). What the &$^# is going on when VS 2005 has to screw up other working programs and force you to do a further install? Those programs were on my machine at the time. Couldn't it install what it needed for those programs? In both cases I was not really doing anything or using any "feature" - I was just opening the app. Is it not possible MS to get what it needs installed the first time and not make you go back to do more installation later? Is it not possible for them to tell you what "feature" you're supposedly using and what the blank they just installed? This is something of a rant and complaint, but I would like to know the answers to these questions if you happen to be familiar with why this happens. Thanks.
Russell
|
|
|
|
|
The auto-"repair"[^] function of Windows Installer?
Drives one nuts, from time to time..
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe.
"I are troll" ??? Wouldn't want to associate myself with trolls . . . perhaps I am not understanding this correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, no wonder I didn't understand. I'm not a gamer at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am acting as a subcontractor and need to install an app in a .NET 2.0 environment. Unfortunately the only compiler I have at hand at the moment is VisualStudio 2008 Express, which supports only .NET 3.5. I started porting the code from C# to pure C++ (console app) but figured out that it also requires .NET 3.5.
Can anyone recommend which compiler I should use? Free or commercial?
Thanks in advance
Olivier
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
1.
VS2008 targets .NET 2.0/3.0/3.5 i.e. you can choose what .NET Framework your app will rely upon.
VS2008 itself requires .NET 3.5
2.
all .NET Frameworks can be downloaded freely and can be installed in 10 minutes.
3.
VS2008 has Express Editions for each of the supported languages; these are free, and can be downloaded and installed in 10 minutes.
FYI: Each language uses a different VS2008 Express, making working with multiple languages more difficult.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Luc,
Good tips but I have some feedback:
1. If VS2008 can target 2.0, I guess you're referring to the full version (not Express, which does not give the option - or, at least, I have not found it: the option is inactive and forced to 3.5)
2. Try to convince a financial institution that they have to update the framework of their back-end just for a small add-on... Which is why I would prefer to stick to their environment, not force a new one.
3. I am using VS2008 Express in English without any issue... apart from the .NET framework targeted!
I will try the trial version of VS2008: this may be my answer in the short-term.
Thanks
Olivier
|
|
|
|
|
1, 2 + 3: SharpDevelop lets you target the .NET 2.0 framework, just like Visual Studio does
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Eddy,
Good tip for future projects. My main issue here could be the license: they accept only proprietary code and BSD-like licenses. GPL and LGPL are an issue - and part of the app accesses a database (there, FreeTDS would be rejected for this reason). So I have to stick to VS200x, I'm afraid (also, I have to deliver, don't have time to investigate this time...)
Cheers
Olivier
|
|
|
|