|
netJP12L wrote: Can I use Framework 3.0 or 3.5 with Vistual Studio 2005
Yes. A google search will lead you to the correct MS pages to download what you need.
netJP12L wrote: is Framework 3.5 is out
Yes, has been for some time.
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for answering. i am scared upgrading from 2.0 or 3.5 in my existing vs 2005 as it may corrupt something. do you think this possibility. Why microsoft is releasing their framwork so often. It's getting very tough to catch up and live up the with one framwork atleast for a while.
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 and 3.5 live in addition to 2.0 so you can still use 2.0 if you like. In fact, VS2008 gives you the option of which of these frameworks you'd like to use on the New Project screen.
If you go for it you'll be able to play with LINQ, extension methods, WPF etc... That's why they added the new frameworks - new stuff/toys to play with 
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
netJP12L wrote: i am scared upgrading from 2.0 or 3.5 in my existing vs 2005 as it may corrupt something. do you think this possibility.
It is possible but unlikely. That's what backups are for.
2005 to 2008 upgrade is a lot easier than 2003 to 2005 especially as VS2008 supports multi-targetting. That means that in VS2008 you can specify what version of the .NET Framework you want to use in your project.
netJP12L wrote: Why microsoft is releasing their framwork so often.
Jeez, if you think that is bad you should have been around when MFC was at its height (late 90s). MS were releasing a new version of that every few months at one point.
.NET 3.0 and 3.5 are purely additive. In otherwords they don't make changes to bits released in previous versions. (Unlike 1.1 to 2.0)
That means that if you know .NET 2.0 then you are not required to learn anything new unless you want to.
netJP12L wrote: It's getting very tough to catch up and live up the with one framwork atleast for a while.
Then concentrate on the areas you will find useful. I try and take a high level view of everything so I know what is out there. Then I drill down into what I need when I need it. I find that I can ramp up to a new part of the framework fairly quickly because I already know what it is for and what it does, I just need to learn the detail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Dears
I want a code to find and get HDD Serial Number without WMI in Windows XP with Framework 2 or VS2005 (C# Language)
Can anyone help me?
|
|
|
|
|
Screwdriver - open case - remove housing - Eyes
I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days 
|
|
|
|
|
That is very hard to write in C# though
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Stockwell wrote: very hard to write in C#
Simple:
Console.WriteLine("Screwdriver - open case - remove housing - Eyes");
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Screwdriver screw = new ScrewDriver();
screw.OpenCase();
screw.RemoveHousing();
screw.Dispose();
Eye eye = God.GiveMeSomeEyePlease();
eye.SuspendLayout();
eye.SeeMyHDDSerialNumber();
eye.isMine = true;
While (true) { Human.isLearnable = true; }
|
|
|
|
|
Pedram Behroozi wrote: // No necessary to dispose Eye
You mean it's not derived from EyeDisposable?
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Just kidding 
There's a DLL[^] but why don't you want to use WMI?
While (true) { Human.isLearnable = true; }
|
|
|
|
|
I want to bang in a nail but I dont want to use a hammer, the end of a pair of pliers or even the sole of my shoe. Can anyone help me?
|
|
|
|
|
I always favour a rock as a good alternative
Bob
Ashfield Consultants Ltd
|
|
|
|
|
So the analogy is bust that case open to check the Serial number?
|
|
|
|
|
Did you know the volume serial number changes every time you reformat the drive?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, everyone.
A little help needed )
Is there any posibility to use different font style for different items in checkedlistbox?
For example, if I want to strike item if it's checked?
Can't find how to do that with standart checkedlistbox (
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
I think you'll need to handle the drawing yourself to do that.
You can get the same effect by using a ListView with the View set to List and CheckBoxes to true, then set the Font of any ListViewItems that you need to have different.
[edit] Just had a look, and the CheckedListBox doesn't support DrawItem so it's going to be a little more difficult if you don't want to use a ListView. You'd have to derive your own class from CheckedListBox and override OnDrawItem there.[/edit]
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
I've tryed to handle drawing, but it draws all control and I need one item (
|
|
|
|
|
See the edit to my previous post.
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. I'm working on a remote desktop program and since I couldn't find a way to create a hook for the video, I'm taking screenshots and send them. Needless to say this is very slow. I'm looking for a method to read the video card buffer directly (only the last changes). This way the cpu doesn't have to process a few MB of data few times per second.
Any input would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
xax wrote: This way the cpu doesn't have to process a few MB of data few times per second.
Let's see. Take a 1024 x 768 x 328 bit color. That's an odd 750KB, updating roughly 60 or more times a second. So we end up with around 45MB of memory that needs to be scanned every second, nevermind any other processing.
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - coming soon ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
modified on Friday, October 10, 2008 12:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
leppie wrote: Take a 1024 x 768 x 32 bit color. That's an odd 750KB
hmm....my calculator must be broken... 
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Whahahahaha! I didnt even notice! Of course there is only 8 bits in a byte 
xacc.ide - now with TabsToSpaces support IronScheme - 1.0 beta 1 - coming soon ((lambda (x) `((lambda (x) ,x) ',x)) '`((lambda (x) ,x) ',x))
|
|
|
|
|
Well, technically, you did say "odd", and it IS indeed close
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
