|
JavaBear wrote: Who was talking about the Windows task bar? Isn't the Mac Dock just like the Windows task bar? [Roll eyes, smacks forehead, picks nose]
The point was, you still have to do that on Windows. So, you should try playing fair in your critique. The going back to the primary monitor isn't exclusive to Macs. This is a fairly obvious point.
JavaBear wrote: FYI, CTRL left click is not the same as Right click in Windows, you Mac fan boys are SOOOO smart that your IQs must have looped back around to zero.
It pulls up a contextual menu. How is this not like it? Unless you mean the torture and pain of pressing a key first. In which case, you should take note of my point of buying a two button Mac mouse rather than skip over it.
You PC fanboy's can only point out a mouse with one button because you don't know anything about Macs in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude stop embarrassing yourself, I'm posting these messages from a Mac (and yes I have a two button mouse, and no it's not an Apple mouse).
How about you go to a Windows machine and see if you can see the difference between doing a CTRL Click and a right click.....
|
|
|
|
|
JavaBear wrote: Dude stop embarrassing yourself, I'm posting these messages from a Mac
And that means your not biased and/or know what a fair comparison is how?
JavaBear wrote: (and yes I have a two button mouse, and no it's not an Apple mouse).
And so you invalidate your own point, seeing that you can right click on a Mac and have been able to do so for years. Whining about it seems rather stupid now don't it?
JavaBear wrote: How about you go to a Windows machine and see if you can see the difference between doing a CTRL Click and a right click.....
Stop embarrassing yourself. I'm posting this from a Windows machine.  Point is, you can get the functionality of it in one of two ways - both of which I mentioned - and once is exactly the same as is on a PC. So, your no right-click crap is just that.
|
|
|
|
|
Yawn... thanks for the pointless chat.
|
|
|
|
|
You're quite welcome. Enjoy not right clicking with your right mouse button.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't expect to have either option in the forseeable future.
My 19" standard aspect ratio is 'it' for now (donations cheerfully accepted).
In my vivid imaginings, however, it seems that one could enjoy a much more life-like rendition of online 'entertainment' on the larger screen - further details would cause this message to be deleted by the management (or initiate one of the most "interesting" threads in a while).
|
|
|
|
|
One little screen - 15" or smaller.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. That's no option. That's bad working conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I use 2 x 22" widescreens at home and at work.
|
|
|
|
|
great. do your work area related to video or graphics?
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
Mostly web based applications, I generally use 1 screen for VS and the other for testing, sql and other progs like outlook etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I use three monitors; a 24 inch widescreen and two 20 inch widescreens. The 24 inch monitor (in the center) and one 20 inch monitor (on the right) are connected to a Windows Vista machine and the other 20 inch monitor (on the left) is connected to a Mac OS X machine. Both computers run Synergy to share one mouse, keyboard, and clipboard.
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer multiple screens, as long as they are the same make and size.
And it's a little irritating when Windows XP throws my cursor to the next screen when I come a little too close to the edge, or is it my display card driver doing it?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there, first post here
I currently use and abuse with multiple desktops with yod'm3d. A bit like compiz in linux it gives me 4 desktops (and a nice spining cube  ). I consider it better than panning two, three or four monitors. Of course I could do better with a 20"+ monitor, but my 17" is still doing it's job.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Hope Microsoft catches on with Windows 7
|
|
|
|
|
i currently use two 22" at work and a 24" screen at home but two 24" @1900*1200 for multiple visual studio, sql querys, a couple of pages and vmware and some custom apps; and i will never use alt+tab anymore. 
P.D. Yes i will.
|
|
|
|
|
Sure you will, you have to switch screens somehow. You aren't going to use the mouse to move focus from VS over to IE are you? : )
Mike Devenney
|
|
|
|
|
It will give me feeling of watching TV, and perhaps my neck will be hurt
|
|
|
|
|
If you dont have one, you will never know
|
|
|
|
|
subai wrote: It will give me feeling of watching TV, and perhaps my neck will be hurt
No it does not look like TV(specially not today when you have TV size around 50" - 60"). As long as you keep good distance between your chair - screen it's all good.
I've got iMAC 24"(1920x1200) and I'm loving the screen. So much room for you to work on...
- Stop thinking in terms of limitations and start thinking in terms of possibilities -
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed! I have an XPS with dual 24" monitors at home and LOVE it!! My company is just getting the idea that developers can benenfit from the dual display so I'll have to wait a bit more for my work rig to match my home rig but we're getting there.
Mike Devenney
|
|
|
|
|
you are lucky,my first screen was a 15" CRT, then i get a 17" CRT, and finally a 17" LCD
having an iMAC 24" most be wonderfull 
|
|
|
|
|
lol, when I first used computer in my life (which was around 98-99) I was working on 14" CRT and then moved on 17"CRT and then LCD came and now finally I got iMAC. Just got it last Thursday. It just feels different working on 24" MAC screen, the graphics makes it all worth. You should get this if possible. And not not mention that it runs windows on Parallels.
- Stop thinking in terms of limitations and start thinking in terms of possibilities -
|
|
|
|
|
First depending on what you use CTRL-Z for it just might
I want a friggin 4'x3' 200 DPI display, that comes in a tube and just rolls out onto your wall. ... maybe a 2'x3' second display for sidebar stuff
I think such things will be possible within the next 15 or fewer years (at a reasonable cost).
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
