C#

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
 
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            string test = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["test"];
        }
    }
}

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
 
namespace DataAccessLayer
{
    public class DataAccess
    {
        private string connectionString;
 
        public DataAccess()
        {
            this.connectionString = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["connectionString"];
 
            // you could also use the following, which is the "more correct" way
            // this.connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["connectionString"];
        }
 
        public string ConnectionString
        {
            get
            {
                return this.connectionString;
            }
        }
    }
}

this.connectionString = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["connectionString"];

Dic1.op1();
Dic1.op2();
Dic1.op3();

// Thread 1
{
    Dictionary localDic=Dic1; // This is my approach avoiding a lock
    localDic.op1();
    localDic.op2();
    localDic.op3();
    // end of scope for localDic
}

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]

---

Voting for dummies? No thanks.

---

// Thread 1
{
    Dictionary localDic=Dic1;
    localDic.op1();
    localDic.op2();
    localDic.op3();
}


// Thread 2
{
    Dictionary Dic2 = new Dictionary();
    Dic2.insert();
    Dic2.insert();
    Dic2.insert();
    Dic1 = Dic2;
}

Luc Pattyn wrote:

Dic1=Dic2; is an
atomic operation.