|
ASP.NET C Sharp User Info Snag
Suppose I write a asp.net app using c sharp and I want to have a look at some user information. How would I go about doing this? i remember in good ol' html and dhtml there was a way of peeking at the information packet sent to the server. I remember it was called "sniffing". But I don't recall how it is done. How do I snag the user's information?
|
|
|
|
|
Probably on the Request object.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
I want to add a progress bar to my button click event, since the Button_Click event in code-behind does a lot of data process and sometime takes 3-4 minutes to finish. Does anyone have ideas how to do it?
Any help would be very appreciated!
Thanks!!
|
|
|
|
|
You need to use AJAX to do that.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for responses! Do you know any examples that I can reference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much! It looks very promising. I will give it try and see if it works.
|
|
|
|
|
I can upload file from my local machine using the ,FTPClient, to the FTP site,
but when once the application is on the web server no file shows on the FTP site.
It does not even try to upload...
|
|
|
|
|
Guess you need to ask Richard Howard how to use his library then.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
If it has logging features, have you enabled them so as to troubleshoot and narrow down on what is breaking and where is the bottleneck being encountered?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have a drop down menu that contains the selection of time.for example from 12:01 AM to 11:59 PM?
thanks for your answer..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, thanks. But if it is possible to include it inside "response.write" object?..How?
Thanks..
|
|
|
|
|
Hi please can any one help out
I have file upload issue here.. whenever a page postback it lost it state, even i have set it attribute EnabledViewState to "True".
i dont figure out what is the problem y it is behaving like that
if any one help me out i shall be thanxful
|
|
|
|
|
HEllo frnd
i want to know how can i send email through
Asp.net with C# to send email
(2) Do i need an IIS to send an email
|
|
|
|
|
Is Google[^] broken in America today?
Paul Marfleet
"No, his mind is not for rent
To any God or government"
Tom Sawyer - Rush
|
|
|
|
|
"Do i need an IIS to send an email "
One has to wonder how he's serving ASP.NET pages without IIS ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote this[^] article for people with your specific problem.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Would like best advise on following situation (been looking and haven't found much). Have a .net 2 site with custom forms authentication enabled for subfolder /calendar working fine (uses an already existing sql2005 database to lookup user/pwd combinations).
authentication mode="Forms" loginUrl="calendar/login.aspx" name=".myName" <br />
path="calendar/" defaultUrl="calendar/default.aspx" enableCrossAppRedirects="false"
<location path="calendar/admin"><br />
<system.web><br />
<authorization><br />
<allow roles="adm"/><br />
<deny users="*"/><br />
</authorization><br />
</system.web><br />
</location>
But, I now have a need for a smaller subset of folks to gain access to another subfolder /conference with a DIFFERENT lookup to an sql2005 database for it's subfolder /conference/admin. Totally separate from the scenario in paragraph 2.
If I put a stripped-out webconfig in the /conference subfolder with only the location path information and the login information using a different cookie name, will that work?
Or, how can I do this?
Janet
|
|
|
|
|
janetb99 wrote: If I put a stripped-out webconfig in the /conference subfolder with only the location path information and the login information using a different cookie name, will that work?
Will what work? Putting a webconfig in a subfolder? They hide that information in the documentation[^]
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry to have offended, I was asking for a more experienced developer's advice. Hence a forum??? I know you referenced the documentation page, which I've tried to look through, but doesn't seem to address what I'm speaking of?
The items I've found referencing this topic tend to imply that one must include a subWeb config file. That, however, stops any pages from within that sub area from referencing higher heirarchy master pages, sitemap files, etc. That seems terribly wasteful to me - duplicating everything in a subFolder/subWeb? So, is there a way to perhaps have two very different folders/login pages/roles referenced in the root webconfig file?
OR, is there another way to do this of which I'm not aware?
Better?
|
|
|
|
|
Well I just read your latest post and your first post several times again attempting to gain an understanding of what you are trying to ask and/or do but I just can't get there. I guess you do need a more experienced developers advice. Good luck
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Umm, let me try again. I'll do my best to be a bit clearer. (IIS6, Server2003)
I have a web app that has a subfolder (/subfolderA) requiring a login page with forms authentication and roles. Goes against a custom sql2005 database for authentication and that's working fine.
But, I have another subfolder (/subfolderB) that requires its own login that goes against a different sql2005 database for authentication - one having nothing to do with the other.
When I tried to put a separate webconfig file in /subfolderB, it required that the subfolder be a separate app. That meant that references to MasterPages, images, etc., be in /subfolderB (or referenced explicitly). That seems to be contrary to what I've read on good development?
Does anyone know a way in the original webconfig to have two separate login page references, or is there a better way to do this?
Sorry for the confusion, and thanks.
Janet
|
|
|
|
|
That seems mostly clear now. Yes you do seem to be running into an inherent premise that different logins means different applications. I assume there is some reason beyond your control that there are different membership databases since that would certainly not be a typical good practice design.
Before accepting the situation and therefore solution as you have described it, I would certainly make an exhaustive effort to look for a way to make those two membership systems look like one from a project perspective. That would allow you to have a single sign on scenario for the site, the users and your project thereby eliminating all the added complexity for everyone just because of the poor membership database design. I would imagine this is possible and there might be a variety of choices in regards to how to do it. The first options would be to look at using database technology to integrate the two disparate systems.
led mike
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
