|
Thanks Mark.
You learn new stuff everyday if you just try.!
A C++ programming language novice, but striving to learn
|
|
|
|
|
Larry Mills Sr wrote: You learn new stuff everyday
It will be a sad day when I don't 
Cheers,
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Mark, what about
int ch = str.GetAt(0) - _T('0');
?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone help me get on the right track with this program. I am having a hell of a time with this. I have to use De Morgans Law to show the original expression and the new expression:
a) ! ( x < 5 ) && ! ( y >= 7)
b) ! ( a == b ) || ! ( g != 5)
c) ! ( (x <= 8 ) && ( y > 4 ) )
d) ! ( (i > 4 ) || ( j <= 6 ) )
I know how to put it into De Morgans Law I just don't understand how to put it into a source code in C++
|
|
|
|
|
Please look at my code given below.
I am trying to download the one folder from one site using FTP
I have written the code for Download directory which calls itself recursivly and I am closing and opening the connetion eac time.
But the problem is it downloads only first two folders completly but it could not find the third folder or file though it is there.
FindNextFile function returns false after downloading second folder.
Please help me for this..
Here is the code for Download Directory
BOOL CFTPUpDwnldManager::DownloadDirectory(CString strSrcDirPth,
CString strTrgfDirPath)
{
BOOL bRetVal = FALSE;
theApp.WriteFTPlog("Src Directory:" + strSrcDirPth);
theApp.WriteFTPlog("Trg Directory:" + strTrgfDirPath);
if(strSrcDirPth.IsEmpty() || strTrgfDirPath.IsEmpty())
{
return bRetVal;
}
// assum that *.* is not apped in src and trg path
CString strSrcDirPth1 = strSrcDirPth;
int index = strSrcDirPth1.ReverseFind('//');
int indx= strSrcDirPth1.GetLength() - index;
CString strSrcDirPth2 = strSrcDirPth1.Right(indx);
CString RemoteDir=strSrcDirPth;
CString dirpath=strTrgfDirPath + strSrcDirPth2;
CreateDirectory(dirpath,NULL);
CString LocalDir = dirpath;
CFTPUpDwnldManager *pCFTPUpDMngr = (CFTPUpDwnldManager *)lParam;
if(NULL == pCFTPUpDMngr)
{
return bRetVal;
}
CFTPManager *pFTPManager = (CFTPManager *)lParam;
if(NULL == pFTPManager)
{
return bRetVal;
}
CNSInternetSession* pInternetSession = pFTPManager->GetInternetSessionPtr();
if(NULL == pInternetSession)
{
return bRetVal;
}
pCFTPUpDMngr->CloseFTPConnection();
if(-1 == pCFTPUpDMngr->GetFTPConnection())
{
return bRetVal;
}
CFtpFileFind fileFind(pFtpConnection,0);
CString strFindFilePath = RemoteDir + "/*.*";
BOOL bContinue = fileFind.FindFile(strFindFilePath) ;
DWORD dw = GetLastError();
if (!bContinue)
{
// the directory is empty; just close up and return.
fileFind.Close();
return bRetVal;
}
while (bContinue)
{
bContinue = fileFind.FindNextFile();
DWORD dw = GetLastError();
CString tempDirName = fileFind.GetFileName();
CString tempDirPath = fileFind.GetFilePath();
CString tempFileUrl= fileFind.GetFileURL();
if(fileFind.IsDots())
{
continue;
}
if (fileFind.IsDirectory())
{
CString NewSrcDir = RemoteDir + "/" + tempDirName;
//CString NewTrgDIr = LocalDir + "/" + tempDirName;
CString NewTrgDir = LocalDir;
DownloadDirectory( NewSrcDir ,NewTrgDir );
}
else
{
DownloadFile( RemoteDir + "/" + tempDirName ,LocalDir + "/" + tempDirName );
}
}
bRetVal = TRUE;
return bRetVal;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi all.
view does not repaint properly when the main frame window is resized
thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
v.j wrote: view does not repaint properly when the main frame window is resized
Thanks for letting us know.
By the way, how did you come up with such an elaborate subject line?
|
|
|
|
|
v.j wrote: thanks in advance.
You're welcome, in retrospect.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
You can use of Invalidate.
|
|
|
|
|
The messages generated by the system should handle that.
Please don't reinforce this poor posting behavior!
Mark
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. 
|
|
|
|
|
hello everyone;
please tell me "How to add button to CListCtrl ?"
thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
why r u post ur thread in my thread ,
please post it in new thread for relevant answers.
IN A DAY, WHEN YOU DON'T COME ACROSS ANY PROBLEMS - YOU CAN BE SURE THAT YOU ARE TRAVELLING IN A WRONG PATH
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am trying to initialize an object using it's constructor, but the members of the object are just not getting initialized.I will just explaining it to you with some coding so that you can understand my issue in a better way.
I have a base class ,say CBase and I am deriving a class from it ,say Derived.
<br />
Base<br />
----<br />
class CBase<br />
{<br />
int nBmember1;<br />
int nBmember2;<br />
<br />
public:<br />
CBase(int nBmember1,int nTempMember):nBmember1(nBmember1),nBmember2(nTempMember){}<br />
<br />
<br />
};<br />
<br />
Derived<br />
-------<br />
class CDerived :public CBase<br />
{<br />
int nDmember1;<br />
public:<br />
CDerived(int nBmember1,int nTempMember,int nTempMember2):CBase(nBmember1,nTempMember),nDmember1(nTempMember){}<br />
<br />
};<br />
<br />
int main()<br />
{<br />
CDerived *DerivedObj= new CDerived(25,50,75);<br />
}<br />
<br />
While creating an object passing these parameters ,It goes to the derived class constructor,the derived class constructor in turn calls the Base class constructor with their respective arguments.But these values are not being assigned to the members of the class.
while I access the DerivedObj , it has some junk value for its members..
I don't have any clue on why the object is not getting initialized with the correct values? Have anyone of you come across an issue like this?
Please help....
|
|
|
|
|
cydd wrote: nBmember1(nBmember1),
your formal parameter and member variable are having same name in the base class,
If you follow naming conventions like "m_" prefix for member variable, this type of programming errors can be avoided.
cydd wrote: (int nBmember1,int nTempMember,int nTempMember2):CBase(nBmember1,nTempMember),nDmember1(nTempMember){}
nTempMember2 is ununsed. always compile with highest warning level and don't ignore warnings, i prefer consider warning as error. unreferenced variable is easily caught by compiler.
modified on Saturday, March 8, 2008 6:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for ur response Rajkumar.
I appreciate ur suggestion.
However I tried using different names for the formal parameters, it's not working.
The warning level is 4 which is the maximum ..
But it doesnt show any kind of warning for this.
One more thing,I have used pragma pack(1) in the header file. if this could help you in assisting me.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
i am new learner for visual c++6.hi..i know this question sounds like stupid, but there is nobody that surrounding me i can ask. i had already found the other people program at
http://www.ucancode.net/Visual_C_MFC_Example/Create-2d-bar-line-pie-chart-vc-example.htm
however, there are a few things that i am not sure about it. can someone help me to solve it? what is it mean by m_pGraphObject1 and ID_OBJECT_GRAPH_1 and where should i type all those command in the program? the example given is in the pie chart, how to do for the line graph? i really know nothing about the programmiing, but i have to submit my work at the end of March..Hope somebody that is kind can help me with ths..thanks..
llf
|
|
|
|
|
m_pGraphObject1 is an instance of CGraphObject class. If you want to use it then you need to download the corrensponding source files and include them in your project.
Member 4773877 wrote: the example given is in the pie chart, how to do for the line graph?
Since you're not experienced I suggest you to download the demo project, have a look at code and start to try little changes.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for your help...do you mean that i have to refer to the 2DLineGraph.cpp file in order to modify the course code?
llf
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
We have a lot of discussion in the two days, seems points from people are not quite the same (at least to some degree). Let me quote the original statement from Bjarne and code again here.
My question is,
1. if you agree g(int) -- declaration only -- will not instantise function f to f<int>, which conflicts with Bjarne's point, could you provide some code to prove please?
2. if you agree with Bjarne's points, g(int) -- declaration only -- will instantise function f to f<int>, could you also provide some code to prove please?
My point is (1), since I think VC instantise a template only when we use it other than deduce any information from template definition phase -- but I can not prove it. If you could prove (1), it is great!
template <class T> void f (T a) { g(a); }
void g(int);
void h()
{
extern g (double);
f (2);
}
--------------------
the point of instantiation for f<int>() is just before h(), so the g() called in f() is the global g (int) rather than the local g (double).
--------------------
BTW: from above statement from Bjarne, I think he means declaration of g(int) before h() will instiatise f to f <int>.
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
i didn't read you discussion.
George_George wrote: 2. if you agree with Bjarne's points, g(int) -- declaration only -- will instantise function f to f<int>,
yes, i agree with bjarne's point
AFAIU, template instantiation is compile time process, declaration is sufficient for compiler to deduce a template function. with "not declaration" you mean definition of function g(int), if not defined linker will catch the unresolved symbol, but in the compilation time itself template instantiation happens, declaration is sufficient. (except the case of inline function, where definition should be visible at compile stage).
George_George wrote: could you also provide some code to prove please?
your example is quite enough to prove, just compile the code (don't build, i mean don't link), the code successfully compiles.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Rajkumar,
Rajkumar R wrote: your example is quite enough to prove, just compile the code (don't build, i mean don't link), the code successfully compiles.
I think you mean the sample in my original question, right? If yes, why if compile successful implies f is instantised by g(int) declaration other than f(2) inside h()? How do you prove it?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: I think you mean the sample in my original question, right?
yes.
George_George wrote: why if compile successful implies f is instantised by g(int) declaration other than f(2) inside h()?
I would reformat this phrase,
if compile successful implies, at the point of function template instantiation 'void f<int> (T)' (i.e f(2) inside h()) being compiled g(a) is deduced to g(int), whose declaration is in the nearest global( or namespace, if called by scope resolution operator) scope.
actually f(2) in h() is used instantiate the template function f(T), where <T> is deduced to <int>
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Rajkumar,
1.
I think you mean f(2) inside h will instantise template function f, right?
2.
When do you think g(int) will be bound to template function f? During the time of instantiation or during the time of compiler parsing definition of template function f?
(discuss in MSVC context and behavior is fine)
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
