|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: unless you've mistaken CodeProject for SourceSafe
|
|
|
|
|
hi All,
i want to scroll two listviews to be scrolled simeltaniously.
so which event handler of listview shud be used?
& how to code for this stuff........
so plz help me for this..
thanx in advance......
Best Regards,
Dnyan
|
|
|
|
|
The scroll event seems the obvious choice, when one scrolls, check if the other is out of sync and if so, scroll it. Don't just scroll it, your big issue will be making sure the two events don't keep just scrolling each others windows, until the stack overflows.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
hi Christian Graus,
i think u r right?
but now consider there is same size always......
so both shud syncro simeltaiously........
plz give me some solution
thanx
|
|
|
|
|
HI ,
I am developing a small application in which C# reads a file make changes to it and saves it.
The txt files contains dome configuration values say
TimeOut=30<br />
ID=abcd<br />
Scope=Allowed<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
1.In my screen i also want to show these values, so what is the method to fetch individual values
2.When i make any change to the value i want it to be saved in that particular line itself.
Thanks in Advance.
Deepak Surana
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you using an ini file and not XML ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying that INI files are the be all and end all of config files, but they are a *lot* easier for novice users to edit, compared to XML files.
Cheers,
Vikram.
"real dictators don't loose[sic] elections." - Diego Moita.
|
|
|
|
|
deepaks3 wrote: 1.In my screen i also want to show these values, so what is the method to fetch individual values
You can read the values into a dictionary like this:
Dictionary<string, string> values = new Dictionary<string, string>();
foreach (string line in File.ReadAllLines(fileName)) {
string[] data = line.Split('=');
if (data.Length == 2) values.Add(data[0], data[1]);
}
To read a value from the dictionary:
string id = values["ID"];
deepaks3 wrote: 2.When i make any change to the value i want it to be saved in that particular line itself.
Files are not line based, so you can't change a single line in a file. It's possible to update the file from that line and forward, but it's complicated. Just rewrite the entire file.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi to all,
I am using .Net framework 1.1 and want to download files from FTP using C#. Anybody please help me to how to do this.
Pravin
|
|
|
|
|
Use WebClient class and DownlodData method in that. Before you need to authenticate the server. There are tons of samples available online.
|
|
|
|
|
is there any way in Listview to set a column property like frozen property in Datagridview ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y<p?jxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
No, there isn't.
You'd have to write your own implementation of the ListView control to expose the properties required and provide all the drawing code to do this.
Or, you might want to try and find a 3rd party library that gives you such functionality. I don't know of any that do this.
|
|
|
|
|
hi there,
i want to know that why | and & exists if they seems to be useless infront of || and &&
please tell the use of | and &
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y<p?jxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
| and & perform a bitwise operation, while || and && perform logical operations.
Also, the evaluation of || and && expressions is aborted once the result is certain, while | and & takes every operand into consideration.
Regards,
mav
--
Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...
|
|
|
|
|
| and & are bit-wise operation while || and && are logic operation.
Was it you or somebody else who insisted on using all | and & instead of || and && for logic operations??
|
|
|
|
|
yeah, i remebered, this thing is still confusing
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y<p?jxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Well, just use them as what they are meant for.
| and & for bitwise operation, much like + and /.
|| and && for logic operation, to make condition decision, or to get a true/false value, generally.
Most of the time, the result is the same, but the process where the result is resolved is different. Logic operation will be short-circuited by compiler, and I believe it is faster to be execute by CPU (correct me if I am wrong), because they are basically compare and jump operations.
If you use the bitwise operators instead of the logic operators, each and every one of the bitwise operators are to be evaluated, and under some situation, you may not get the same outcome:
obj= null;
a) if(obj != null && obj.ToString().Length > 0)
b) if(obj != null & obj.ToString().Length > 0)
Case b) will throw an exception because all of the statements in the if have to be evaluated.
|
|
|
|
|
| and & are bitwise operands. They can also be used as conditional operands (is that the right word?). The difference is easiest to explain with an example.
int x = 3; int y = 7;
if(x == 3 || y == 9)
Console.Writeline("Good to go.");
if(x == 3 | y == 9)
Console.Writeline("Good to go.");
In both cases "Good to go." is printed to the console. In the first case when x == 3 is evaluated to true, the body of the if statement is executed. In the second case x == 3 is evaluated to true and then y == 9 is also evaluated to true.
& works the same way:
int x = 3; int y = 7;
if(x == 4 && y == 9)
Console.Writeline("Good to go.");
if(x == 4 & y == 9)
Console.Writeline("Good to go.");
Once again in the first case, y == 9 is not evaluated. In the second case y == 9 is evaluated. In neither case is "Good to go." printed.
Does this make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
buddies, i know how they works, you misunderstood my question, i asked that why we uses | instead of ||, because || is better than | and output always same
e.g.
if (bool1 == true | bool2 == true)
// execute code
if (bool1 == true || bool2 == true)
// execute code
in above code both result will be same, but in first it will check both conditions however in second it will check first condition, if it false then check another else not
so why we uses | to decrease our performance?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y<p?jxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen wrote: so why we uses | to decrease our performance?
| and & are not intended for use as logical operators although they can be (ab)used as such. They're intended for bitwise operations.
x = 6 | 3; <br />
<br />
x = 6 & 3; <br />
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
You only use | and & when you want both conditionals to be evaluated. Here is a somewhat crass example:
if(amanda.AttemptKiss() & sarah.AttempKiss())
Console.WriteLine("I'm back at university");
Even if you fail to kiss Amanda, you still want to try to kiss Sarah.
|
|
|
|
|
hehe, example of kisses 
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87??6?N8?BcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKSQXUFYK[M`UKs*$GwU#(QDXBER@CBN%
Rs0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-i?TV.C\y<p?jxsg-b$f4ia>
--------------------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
You should also check
if ( amanda.AttemptKiss ( sarah ) )
I would also consider having individual variables for containing individual references as too limiting and would instead use a Queue<Girls>.
|
|
|
|
|
To be pedantic.
<br />
Queue<girl> girls = new Queue<girl>();<br />
PopulateFromBar(girls);<br />
foreach(Girl g in girls){<br />
try {<br />
Drink d = bar.GetDrink();<br />
this.AttemptFlirt(g);<br />
g.Imbibe(d);<br />
this.AttemptKiss(g);<br />
this.CopAFeel(g);<br />
this.InviteHome(g);<br />
this.AddCompanion(g);<br />
this.Successes++;<br />
break;<br />
} catch(SlapException e) {<br />
this.AvoidList.Add(e.Girl);<br />
this.Drink(bar.GetDrink());<br />
} catch (RejectionException e) {<br />
this.Drink(bar.GetDrink());<br />
}<br />
}<br />
<br />
this.Travel(this.Home);<br />
</girl></girl>
For me, Successes is without a doubt a signed short. Can you get smaller than a short? I suppose we want a ridiculously large number that will never be reached in the future (*cough*640k*cough*), so that will do 
|
|
|
|
|
John Oxley wrote: Can you get smaller than a short?
SByte
But don't let them know you have only a short.
if ( g.HasFriend )
{
this.WingMan.Add ( g.Friend ) ;
}
And try not to use break in a foreach, in fact why foreach a queue?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
