|
Browsing someone else's bookmarks
How about allowing to browse someone elses bookmarks?
Probably the owner would have to enbable this feature. It might be a nice feature to re-discover
Add comment to bookmark
Letting me add a short comment to each of my bookmarks might be helpful in coming back to them, as neither the authors title nor abstract necessarily tells me why I would like to remember this article.
I am not sure if this feature is terribly great or even useful at all, though. Comments?
Remove the article URL from bookmark list
Showing the article URL doesn't really add any value. It's silly. It takes away space. You could put a personal annotation there... (hint hint)
"Bookmarked" as quality indicator
Not sure, but bookmarking an article is maybe a good indicator for article quality - especialyl if you somehow rate authors whose articles were bookmarked higher. (Would google sue?)
Just an idea for the neverending "how to find the good stuff" saga.
Download counter
Any obstacles in implementing "downloaded N times since xxxx"?
(Except maybe people gaming the system to artificially increase their download count, and kill the servers?)
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Someone elses Bookmarks
I'd have to disagree with you on this one. I don't want anybody to discover my secret VB fetish! And if it was an opt-in feature, you'd have to take pot luck as to whether someone had a public list. Would this be a button by their "head" in all their forum posts? On their articles? I can see that being a lot of work for neglible benefit.
Add comment.
Strongly agree.
Remove article URL.
Depending on how good the title and summary are, it gives you a bit more info about by why you bookmarked it. I'd have to agree that a user comment (which I like) would make my point irrelevant.
Bookmark count for an article.
I can see this being fairly simple to implement (conceptually at least) but isn't the voting system doing this job? You do only bookmark articles you like? And you do give them good votes?
Download counter
1/ Gamable (as you said), 2/ doesn't take into account the people who downloaded, looked at the code and ran with fear, rushing to grab flaming torches and pitchforks. Voting serves this need really.
Iain.
Iain Clarke appearing in spite of being begged not to by CPallini.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, maybe I was a bit brief with my motivation.
Someone elses bookmarks:
Benefit: I'd love to see what the big brains here bookmark, and it might be a cool way to discover quality articles. There's a lof of well-aged gems here, buried in a heap of not-quite-rubbish. Exploring CP (at least for me) is mostly either exposure to the front page, or drilling down for a specific topic.
The opt in is definitely the biggest hurdle, and we can't make it opt out.
Though, gold members and above know all your fetishes anyway 
Bookmark count:
Yes, any ranking based on bookmark count would be mostly identical to voting, and not provide any additional value.
Still, a simple count is additional encouragement for authors. We publish here for different reasons - personally, I do it for the kicks of seeing my stuff being liked and used, and I'd value a bookmark slightly higher than a five vote.
Second, the voting system isn't perfect. I have always defended its merit in the long run, but something like a "bookmark rank" might help or replace article voting where or when it fails. Having the count would allow to evaluate its merit without implementing such a ranking.
I agree, though, that two rankings in parallel would be silly.
Download counter:
Again, just an ego booster for the author, and I don't think votes/popularity really measures up with download count.
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
blog: TDD - the Aha! | Linkify!| FoldWithUs! | sighist
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen wrote: Download counter
Any obstacles in implementing "downloaded N times since xxxx"?
I suggested it several months ago 
|
|
|
|
|
I have signed into my account and gone to my settings. I select that I want the weekly newsletter (I used to get it fine). I select save. The page refreses with the newletter selected. However, if I go off the page and go back to my settings, the newsletter is no longer selected.
What's up???
|
|
|
|
|
I guess, the ^ link which appears next to the descriptive text hyperlink should open a new window right? But in Search Results page, it opens in the same window. The _blank attribute seems to have been eaten by a hungry hamster which has run away.
Affected Page: search.aspx (results of search)
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Can you send me an HTML grab of the results page? It's working fine from where I'm standing
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Chris,
I have emailed you the following at chris (at) and webmaster (at) codeproject.com:
1) Steps to reproduce
2) GeneratedSearchHTML.txt
I haven't pasted both here since it might slow down the page. I also got a JavaScript prompt that the content is bit long and hence chose to send you an email note instead of posting through this.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote an article and found various arbitrary formatting procedures that turned my article into something I didn't intend to write. Here are the problems:
1. The proper format for specifying time complexity for an algorithm (in "big-O notation") is O(n). When I tried submitting an article with that, they turned it into O(n), which looks kind of silly. What can I do about that?
2. For those of you who don't know C++, the end of a class declaration is supposed to be "};". That didn't make it into the first submittion, but when I submitted an edited version, they stripped it out. How do I get this change to be reflected?
|
|
|
|
|
Send me the URL of the article and your original submission and I will look after it personally.
chris at codeproject dot com.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Was searching for a post (comments) in the Lounge and i couldn't figure out why I t find it until I realized that I wasn't always getting results in chronological order.
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
This is by design. Search results return values sorted by relevancy.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Bummer, cause I can usually estimate the date of when I saw something. It wasn't like this before though, right?
"I know which side I want to win regardless of how many wrongs they have to commit to achieve it." - Stan Shannon
Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
|
|
|
|
|
It's exactly as it was (without the timeouts )
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: without the timeouts
Now it is more better, Chris. The timeouts have significantly reduced. So you can feel relaxed that your server became a good puppy instead of being like barking angry dog. 
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted this article, http://www.codeproject.com/KB/WPF/WPFBusinessAppsPartOne.aspx
I found a glitch in the colorizer that forced me to change some VB.NET code in a PRE section to get it to work, but this issue needs to be corrected if possible.
Here is my code: obj.Source.OriginalString.Contains("\Skins\") Then
Inside the PRE section I wanted to render the following code: (note I had to add a space before the ) to prevent a happy face from showing up here)
obj.Source.OriginalString.Contains("\Skins\" ) Then
However the colorizer treated the \"e; as an escaped sequence and cause all the code after it to render in the wrong color.
I had to change the code to this to get it to work: (notice the space after the second backslash.
obj.Source.OriginalString.Contains("\Skins\ " ) Then
Cheers, Karl
My Blog | Mole's Home Page | How To Create Screen Capture Videos For Your Articles
Just a grain of sand on the worlds beaches.
-- modified 27-Feb-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Karl
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Karl,
Have you tried directly using " inside the pre blocks? You don't need to escape it. That might work better.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish,
I thought I tried that when I submitted the article using the article submission wizard. Maybe I overlooked this.
I'll try and post my next article this week so that will give me a chance to try your idea.
Thank you,
modified 27-Feb-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/info/Licenses.aspx
Quote from the GPL description: "A common but misunderstood license. This allows developers to freely use the software as long as they don’t charge for it and as long as they use the same license for parts of the program that they wrote themselves."
The first sentence is apperently right, everything afterwards not. The GPL can be used for commercial application and you can charge as much as you want for selling an GPL application (even through it might not make sense in certain cases because of other restriction). You don't have to use the same license for code you add yourself, it can be a less "restricting one" like public domain for example as long as you also comply with the GPL rules (which means publishing the source of it, if you link it against or use it with GPL code).
It is evident that the author of this article doesn't like those licenses (out of content quotes like "The author of this license ask you not to use this license" or statements like "Unacceptable to many.") but nevertheless the descriptions should be somewhat accurate or the evil licenses removed completely.
|
|
|
|
|
Good points. I've updated the wording to be more accurate
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you still talking about December when we're now in February?
Monthly competition/[^]
Certified VB6, SQL 7 and ASP developer
|
|
|
|
|
Because our competition system is still being updated. I was hoping to have this updated this week but we need to do a few last minute checks before we update.
Sorry for the delay.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Parthasarathy Mandayam wrote: Why are you still talking about December when we're now in February?
A little politeness might paint you in better light than now! 
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: A little politeness might paint you in better light than now!
Ignore it, Nish. Some people feel even stingy to bring a smile on their face. Just by some one barking at CP, no one is going to be discouraged. There is a Tamil saying that 'We ought to be like Swans'*, since Swan has a good art of separating the milk from water and drinking only milk.
Let us only take up the good positive ones which would help us in the growth and vote down the negative ones.
*Source Courtesy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swan[^]
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
