|
Any body got any idea about how to configure the FTP configurations in Windows XP Embedded operation system?
I tried in Windows XP Professional edition, it works fine for me. But i don't know where to configure them for XP embedded OS.
|
|
|
|
|
Found that the same FTP configuration instructions can be followed for Windows XP Embedded OS also.
-vp
|
|
|
|
|
about this article: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/system/inject2exe.aspx[^]
can i resize the code section of a PE file?
for example: i want to add 100 bytes(fill with 0x90) end of the code section.
i change values of "SizeOfRawData" and "VirtualSize" for Code Section header. and i change values of "PointerToRawData" and "VirtualAddress" for next sections.
but the new PE file don't execute.
Zo.Naderi-Iran
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really think we are going to help you build a noop-sled?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
"If it was two men, the non-driver would have challenged the driver to simply crash through the gates. The macho image thing, you know." - Marc Clifton
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to replace a supporting report dll in system32 folder that by web app uses. I unload the web app,disable webserver in IIS and I am unable to copy or delete the file into the folder (access denied file in use etc). Only way I can get around it is to re-boot the computer and copy over at that time. Not a very productive way to accomplish this.
Any thoughts on how to do this easier?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
While loading of my windows application, one of the task is to get all the processes which are running currently.
When i tried to do this, It is raising an error saying that
'Process performance counter is disabled, So the requested operation can not be performed'
Can anyone help me on this that what to do?
Thanks,
Sabarinathan T.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Richard,
Thanks a lot for giving the reference. I tried to do what they asked to follow to disable the performance counters, still i did not get any solution for the problem. That is i did reset of the Dword value to 1 and to 0 back. There was no change in that error for both the values.
Kindly tell me what i should do?
Thanks,
Sabari
There may be many ways to get failure while to succeed is possible by only one way---Ananymous
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ,
I installed Frdora 7.0 on my machine.It work's fine . But when I shutdown the machine then all services is closed and give a message , system is holting , and I have to manually poweroff .
Give me any Idea for resolve this problem .
Thanks for this.
nk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or not using Linux...
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
Please disable the start on poweroff in the CMOS setting.
hakeem
|
|
|
|
|
That has nothing to do with his problem. The CMOS setting just makes it start back up when power is lost. His problem is that his computer won't shutdown at all.
The best way to accelerate a Macintosh is at 9.8m/sec² - Marcus Dolengo
|
|
|
|
|
While running my application i got following error in Application log
Faulting application .exe, version , faulting module mfc42u.dll, version 6.2.8071.0, fault address 0x0000239d.
Corresponding error was logged in System Log
Application Error : The instruction at "0x5f801088" referenced memory at "0x00000004". The memory could not be "read".
Could you let me know when can the above errors occur and what is the cause?
|
|
|
|
|
Your application passed a bad pointer into MFC and it crashed. Run the debug build of your program under the debugger and repeat whatever it was that you did. That should show you - if you're lucky, with an ASSERT, otherwise an exception - where the problem occurs.
If the problem does not recur with a debug build, consider building your release build with debugging information. This is still allowed and is a very good idea for troubleshooting this kind of problem. Under C/C++ in Project Settings, under Debug Info, select Program Database. Then, on the Link tab, check Generate Debug Info. In the Project Options box, add the switch /OPT:REF (this is the default but is suppressed when Generate Debug Info is enabled). The latter switch removes unreferenced code from your project (although it does not have much effect unless Enable Function-Level Linking is enabled under the Customize category of the C/C++ tab).
Most likely you passed a null pointer and MFC tried to use the second member of the structure.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Experts,
I created a com dll for shell context menu for files and folders. When I click on this, a dialog appears.
I want same for Recycle Bin also. What registery entries I have to create?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Check out the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{645FF040-5081-101B-9F08-00AA002F954E} key.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows Server 2008 has been released to manufacturing along with tools and training resources for developers and ISVs. Windows Server 2008 is part of worldwide launch events that highlights the wave of new products that also include SQL Server 2008 and Visual Studio 2008.
Two million copies of beta and evaluation version of Windows Server 2008 have been downloaded.
Windows Server 2008 was developed in tandem with the Windows Vista code base and has most of that operating system’s advanced management and security features, such as integrated Network Access Protection (NAP) and Group Policy. You will also see system-wide performance improvements from an integrated system architecture, including network file sharing, managed quality of service and reduced power consumption. Common tools and processes across both operating systems will result in efficiencies for your customers.
Microsoft expects there to be at least 80 software applications certified for Windows Server 2008 by the end of February, and roughly 300 more that are considered ready for the new platform. A complete list of compatible hardware and software products is available at http://www.windowsservercatalog.com.
More details are available in the Windows Server 2008 RTM news release.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the old info 
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
I've got an XP Pro desktop connected to a Vista laptop through a Linksys WRT54G wireless router. While the connection was successful, copying files from the Vista laptop to the XP Pro desktop is painfully2 slow. So slow, in fact, that Vista reported that the 800MB that I wanted to copy was going to take 30xxx days to complete!
If the laptop is connected to the desktop at 54Mbs (6.75MBs), then an 800MB file should copy in roughly 118 minutes, give or take minutes for extra stuff being transmitted. Am I doing the math right?
What have I not got connected/configured right here, if anything? I would have thought that small amount of data could be copied in just a matter of minutes.
The Linksys folks suggested tweaking the MTU, thinking that maybe the packets are being spilt and reassembled, thus adding to the transmission time.
[edit]
Found what I was looking for here.
[/edit]
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
modified on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I would guess your using the windows file sharing?
It was many years ago i used it last, so i cant remember if it was really slow or not. I would suggest you use FTP to transfer the files, FileZilla have both a cleint and server software (which works both ways) maybe you should try that? If you like low configuration and easy setup maybe you want to use a simple HTTP server, like NAWS[^] (also both ways, upload feature).
The file transfer should of course go a lot faster then that, but if you have a very low signal quality it might go slower (but not that slow..)
I use FTP for all my LAN transfers, and HTTP for all my external transfers. FTP (though a 100Mbps cable) can easily go up to 6000KB/s (with slow computers).
Other (external) factors that can affect the speed may be:
Many small files? (like thousands of them) will slow it down alot. (zip them)
Very fragmented file? (defrag it)
Computer busy with other operations?
Bad signal quality due to reflections?
If the devices are close to each other you might want to buy a short crosswired network cable to connect them directly to eachother, its a lot more reliable and faster (if the 54Mbps is becoming a restriction).
//Johannes
|
|
|
|
|
Changes were made to the file copy algorithm in Windows Vista so it no longer ate all of the system memory if writing to the destination was taking longer than read-ahead from the source file. Unfortunately the new algorithm was significantly worse in many areas. This will be fixed in SP1, due to be released very soon. See http://blogs.technet.com/markrussinovich/archive/2008/02/04/2826167.aspx[^] for some information on what's actually happening.
Windows XP uses the old SMB 1.0 protocol (if you're following that article) which can only copy 60KB before requiring acknowledgement, which breaks TCP's latency-handling mechanisms.
As the other poster says, FTP can be a lot quicker because the data connection is just a 'firehose' TCP connection, there's no extra protocol on top.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
