|
Thx! ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
~3000px wide in FF2.x. Something needs done to stop this from happening again.
http://www.codeproject.com/Lounge.aspx?msg=2410379#xx2410379xx[^]
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
In order to update this article: Window Tabifier[^] I sent an e-mail with the article attached to it at submit@codeproject.com two days ago. Neither I've received an e-mail saying that my article update is in queue nor it has been updated. So is the e-mail late or has the address changed?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Giorgi,
I'll pass this to the editors so they can see what happened to your email.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris, hope the issue will be solved soon 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm facing the same problem again. I sent update yesterday but I've not received any reply yet. Is it only just me or are others experiencing the same problem too?
|
|
|
|
|
It's Monday morning here and the editors are busy digging through weekend emails.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I used to be able to type "codeproject.com" into my address bar of any browser and get the CP homepage. Now, suddenly, if I lazily omit the "www" as I have for so long, I get the "page cannot be found" error. Come on, don't make me type www, Chris.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange.
I can do "codeproject.com" and I do get to this page
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I have the same problem. When I try this[^] it takes me to an error page
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elina Blank wrote: codeproject.com
We are presented with a 404 as follows:
Page Not Found<br />
Unfortunately the page, image or download you are looking for is not on our servers.<br />
<br />
The correct location of the page may be http:
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot edit one of my articles located at:
/KB/aspnet/BuildBanner.aspx
It just comes back with an error saying...
There was a problem creating your article.
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later
nor can I delete the article located at:
/KB/aspnet/BuildConfigurationBanner.aspx
Help!!
|
|
|
|
|
This is weird. Added to the bug list. I'll try and dig in and see what's going on.
All fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
modified on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:14:33 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Which forum would be best for WPF, WF, or WCF questions?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this is a minor deal, but when the article mentions a license, it refers to the Aricle License, not the source code itself. I assume the intention was to apply to the source code, but I have no idea for sure. If it was intended to apply to the article itself, there are a couple of licenses (GPL for one) that caution against using the license for documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
What's the difference to copyright?
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Actually article and code are quite distinct and each of them could be separately copyrighted. By common sense I deduce the same copyright applies to both article and code (if not explicitely stated the opposite), but anyway IMHO the question is legitimate.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I asked, because I had read about some problems in using the GPL for documentation and publishing. Of course I can't find that information now....so maybe I misread it.
But the other reason I mention it, the article specifically states that the license is for the Article, not being sure if it applies to the code as well, I would be afraid to use the code for fear that someone might take the wording literally and not allow the use of code or derivative of the code.
I thought of this as I was reading an article that used the GPL license, but no source code was attached, only binaries.
Just food for thought.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. I agree with you on the overall.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I've reworked the wording a little to make this clearer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There should be a validation when there is no text selected and the user is trying to select one of the toolbar items like B I U Strike Small etc. There is already one for 'Quoting Selected Text'. Without this, a careless user can leave filling up the message with junk empty tags, unnecessarily swelling up the page size and download onto the Internet pipes.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
We allow empty tags so someone can place a tag set in the message then start typing into it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
