|
That was more of a joke. Probably I missed the joke icon and there's absolutely nothing serious with my post. More often than ever, the VBA posts goes into the Visual Basic forum (along with the COM forums, whenever required). Why is that you think I'm unfriendly? I just don't get it. What's wrong with a little pun?
I am a an MFC/Visual C++ developer to the core, as you guessed. But that wouldn't stop me from writing a few lines of VBA Code. I read your query at the VB forum. I feel that it could have been a little more informative. We've got a handful of VB and .NET MVPs here and I'm sure they'll solve your problem. Start a new thread, add a small code snippet, showing how exactly you are trying to achieve your goal, which would help others understand your problem.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
All posts are being marked read every time I switch forums instead of using the magic to guess when I leave and return.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
This happened to me again a few minutes ago. The last time it kept happening until I did a logout/in cycle.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
I just did a site update a few minutes ago - you were probably the victim of a session reset.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I am frequently getting this message since lunch time UK using both Firefox and MSIE7, even after a reboot and even using another computer in my network. (this is what Firefox is actually displaying).
You are not authorized to view this page
You do not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials that you supplied.
Please try the following:
* Contact the Web site administrator if you believe you should be able to view this directory or page.
* Click the Refresh button to try again with different credentials.
HTTP Error 401.1 - Unauthorized: Access is denied due to invalid credentials.
Internet Information Services (IIS)
Technical Information (for support personnel)
* Go to Microsoft Product Support Services and perform a title search for the words HTTP and 401.
* Open IIS Help, which is accessible in IIS Manager (inetmgr), and search for topics titled Authentication, Access Control, and About Custom Error Messages.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I too am getting this error occasionally. In addition, after receiving this screen, if I click the "refresh" button, the page loads, but the layout is really screwy. By "screwy", I mean that the page is only colored in black & white, and columns/rows are overlapping and in strange positions. All the links still work (and appear as blue links, the only color on the page). Then if I click the same link as the one I am presently viewing, the page loads just fine. Also, the last visited time is ALWAYS the time of last refresh, which is good because it immediately shows me when I last refreshed the page, but bad because it doesn't highlight any of the forums as having new posts. Hopefully I didn't get too far off topic with this response.
Sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mondays
-Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
It was happening for me yesterday. I think they have fixed it now. Is your upstream proxy servers caching the content?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: It was happening for me yesterday.
Me too, last evening. And then the "new" yellow tags work in different way now. The site builders updated the program yesterday.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
I should have tested prior to posting, as I was responding based on what I had seen a few hours earlier in the day. Since I posted my previous response in this thread, I have not had any trouble.
Sounds like somebody's got a case of the Mondays
-Jeff
|
|
|
|
|
I was just casually browsing through info/guide.aspx and homepage links. I felt that the following flavors of text should be amended when an user is already logged on.
You can sign up to become a member for free here.
When the user is already logged on, this text either should be suppressed or changed to 'Update your profile' according to the context.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Clicking on the Hall of Fame link doesn't display the list of all MVP award winners.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
And it is still crazy to have a pagination page size of 1 record at a time. I think this page has not been updated in the newer CodeProject.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
No Vasudevan, it's a bug.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: I think this page has not been updated in the newer CodeProject.
MVP award winners' list was announced on 4th Jan, which is after the site upgrade. In fact, you had called me up, if you remember.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
True Rajesh. My doubt was that 'Hall of Fame' page might be old. Since MVP Award Winners notification came through MessageBoards.
Nevermind, if you see another thread, you can find Chris has checked the database and found the issue. It seemed to be some technical snag.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: craziness
I think the word 'craze' itself would suffice. Isn't it? Once in another post, I used 'guiltiness' in a particular context and some one guided me that 'guilt' itself would hold good. The 'ness' suffix would be redundant.
I feel the same argument applicable for this word also. Or am I wrong? Can some one throw more light on this?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: The 'ness' suffix would be redundant.
No. Craziness means madness, going insane, etc.
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: Can some one throw more light on this?
Let there be Light...[^]
Some more light[^]
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. 
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
The bug is fixed and the new version wiull be uploaded soon
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
You've already provided a RSS link for each category of latest updated articles. For Asp.net section it's something like this:
http://www.codeproject.com/webservices/articlerss.aspx?cat=4
It would be great if you could also provide a filterable RSS feed based on the minimum rating of articles. Here is an example of latest ASP.Net articles whose rating is at least 3
http://www.codeproject.com/webservices/articlerss.aspx?cat=4&rate=3
|
|
|
|
|
I think that when you vote <= 3 for an article you should have to give a reason why your voting this low. These suggestions could then be passed on to the author. I'm sick of people giving me crummy votes but not telling me what they thought was wrong or where it could be better. How can you improve something if people don't tell you whats wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree it is both wise and polite to tell the author what you liked/disliked about his article,
but IMO you can not really force people to do so:
- if you provide a text box, they can and often will leave it empty, or enter some nonsense,
if they really don't want to justify the vote;
- if you replace a single vote scale by several multiple-choice questions (say voting separately
on content, form, clarity, inventiveness, etc) you probably will discourage people from voting
in the first place.
One thing I did suggest in the past is CP to collect voting statistics on the voters, and
show those on their personal page, so people voting 1 (or 5) most of the time, would
reveal themselves globally.
The next step would be to "correct" their vote, i.e. to apply an offset that makes them shift
their average to a more reasonnable value.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
This month's tips:
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google;
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get;
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.
|
|
|
|
|
i'm not suggesting a forced suggestion all the time and not a long one either. Just when someone gives you a one or a two its pretty crappy for your overall article score. i posted an article yesterday which i thought was half decent and today i get a 2 for it then i check the comments, nothing! It's so annoying. I think asking people to suggest when they vote 1 or 2 would be reasonable and would probably help to discourage consistent 1 voters who just go round trying to make articles look bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the best would be to ignore say the most extereme 20% of the votes, so the average shown
would actually be the average of only 80% of the votes. When doing so, as soon as you got
six votes, the lone 1 would disappear completetely.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
This month's tips:
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google;
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get;
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe including a weighted standard deviation of the vote could be added in. If someone has a high weighted standard deviation on their vote, then it could possibly indicate a wide range of votes, or if the weighted standard deviation is small, then the range is smaller and possibly a more true indicator.
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
