|
Been a while, but if i recall correctly,
- use GetAdaptersInfo to walk through the adapters
- for each adapter you can walk its list of (local) IP addresses
- create the socket then bind to the local address for the adapter you want
- after the bind connect to the desired peer
...cmk
The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying.
- John Carmack
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way how to catch system messages in a driver created by DDK ?
directly from win or using some way like callback functions in WIN32
<br />
switch(Msg){<br />
case WM_CLOSE:<br />
...<br />
break;<br />
}<br />
thank you for any support
modified on Wednesday, January 09, 2008 11:24:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Not directly, no. Kernel mode has no concept of what a "window" is. You'd need a user-mode component somewhere.
Judy
|
|
|
|
|
Using unicode what is the proper method for formatting currency to have the symbol, separators, and sign(minus) available?
|
|
|
|
|
Use GetCurrencyFormat().
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi again.
I always have problems with templates  . I'm not able to create two template classes with an implicit cast from one to the other (for the same template type). Without the template there are no problems:
class Class1
{
public:
Class1(){};
};
class Class2
{
public:
Class2(){};
Class2(Class1 &mat){};
};
void main()
{
Class1 C1;
fun(C1);
}
But with the template:
void fun(Class2 a){};
template <class T> class TClass1
{
public:
TClass1(){};
};
template <class T> class TClass2
{
public:
TClass2(){};
TClass2(TClass1<T> &mat){};
};
template <class T> void funT(TClass2<T> a){};
void main()
{
TClass1<int> TC1;
funT((TClass2<int> )TC1);
funT(TC1);
}
The compiler is Visual C++ 6.0.
Does anyone know the reason and/or an alternative solution to do this?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
No luck, my friend: you simply cannot instantiate a TClass2 object without speciying its template argument.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]
|
|
|
|
|
I need to set/change the properties of a .txt file (author, title, subject, comment) from a VC++/MFC program. Does anyone know how its done or where that information is actually stored at?
Feather
|
|
|
|
|
This is called compound document properties.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am using Windows Server 2003 Performance Counter tool to monitor the memory consumed by my process.
The interested terms are working set, virtual bytes and private bytes. My questions are,
1. If I want to watch the real physical memory consumed by current process, which one should I monitor?
2. If I want to watch the physical memory + swap file consumed by current process, which one should I monitor?
3. Any more clear description of what these terms mean? I read the help from Performance Counter tool, but still confused which one(s) identifies the real used physical memory, and which one(s) identifies the real used physical memory + page swap file, and which one(s) identifies the required memory (may not be really allocated either in physical memory or in swap page file).
If there are any related learning resource about the concepts, it is appreciated if you could recommend some. 
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: it is appreciated if you could recommend some.
I recommend Google. If you used for search phrase maybe: MSDN Performance counter "working set"
You would find this[^] in the first page of results
|
|
|
|
|
You're too goo man ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi toxcct,
Do you have anything to refer?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't replying to you ! Why to hell do you keep struggling voting posts unrelated to your question ?
NO, I have no input for you in this regard; if I had, I would have answered. bad boy 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi led,
It is not correct. It is exchange server specific things. Not the general working set of Windows memory model.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: It is not correct. It is exchange server specific things. Not the general working set of Windows memory model.
George, I think you will find the definitions provided for working set, virtual bytes and private bytes will be the same for the Performance Counters in your own application. If you don't want to trust that statement feel free to continue to use Google as I did to find the general Windows Performance Counters definitions that no doubt exists somewhere on MSDN.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I found the definition of working set from.
So, in my understanding working set is the amount of actual RAM current process consumed, not including system page swap file. Do you agree?
--------------------
A process's working set is the set of pages that it has currently in memory. The values for maximum working set and minimum working set are hard-coded in Windows NT and are thus impossible to change. There are three values hard-coded for the maximum working set.
--------------------
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/108449/en-us[^]
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: Do you agree?
I don't agree with your use of the word "consumed". Also that document while dated 2006 only discusses Windows NT 3.1 and 3.5. If the information has not actually been updated for later OS versions, it is likely that things have changed some. Also I am not sure what value this simple view of memory provides. Other articles/blogs discussions provide a far more detailed discussion regarding the complex matters of memory models in modern applications and platforms. Here is one example[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks led,
The article gives me some insights. And I have also do some experiment to monitor memory of some process using perfmon.
Sometimes, I saw working set is larger than vitual memory. I am confused. How could it happen?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: I am confused. How could it happen?
Well one obvious way it could happen is lag. Lag could exist at various different places with the process of memory management all they way to the perfmon display. perfmon should not be considered real time I don't believe.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Hi led,
What in your definition and experience working set is? It is appreciated if you could share with us.
In my point, working set is the number of physical memory a process is currently using -- physical memory, not including page files.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: What in your definition and experience working set is? It is appreciated if you could share with us.
Well I have no reason to disbelieve what Salvador Patuel said in his blog.
Working set is the subset of virtual pages that are resident in physical memory only; this will be a partial amount of pages from that process.
he also said:
Note that this replacement policy has been optimized in windows Vista and Windows 2008 to keep more virtual pages on physical memory, that's why you can see that the free memory is lower in these OS.
So we can see that obviously not all OS version are going to be identical.
You still have not explained the significance of this information to you?
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks led,
Your reply is great! As you mentioned,
> Working set is the subset of virtual pages
So, working set has no reason to be larger than virtual bytes, right? (since it is a subset). But I have used perfmon to find sometimes working set is much larger than virtual pages.
I just did two experiements which shows working set is larger than virtual bytes,
1. a straightforward application which do file map, monitor my simple application;
2. do a search of keyword in my SourceInsight environment, monitor SourceInsight process.
Do you have any ideas when/why working set is larger than virtual bytes? If you are interested, I can post my simple application code here.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
George_George wrote: Do you have any ideas when/why working set is larger than virtual bytes?
By definition a subset can not be larger than it's container set.
George_George wrote: I just did two experiements which shows working set is larger than virtual bytes,
If you really want to see that information stop using perfmon. From the same article.
You can explore the working set list using the kernel debugger
led mike
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
