|
Hi everybody,
I've been developing/maintaining several websites with Interdev for quite some time now, and I really like the concept of connecting to a server and maintaining ASP pages "just like that". Then I can ftp the files to the webserver when they are ready. Anyway, I installed Visual Studio .NET - and I can't find any way to connect to a website. All .NET wants me to do is "create a webservice" (Thanks, but no thanks) etc. I just can't get to maintain ASP pages in a simple manner. Of course I can drag the files into the ide and edit them - but then I might as well just go back to notepad.
I thought .NET would have a replacement for Interdev - or are the MS guys just still cooking ?
Any help appreciated!
Best regards
/Jan Hansen
|
|
|
|
|
Like Interdev, you need to create a project or solution. Look for ASP.NET application as a new project to create. Just because it's ASP.NET doesn't mean you have to have everything be ASP.NET pages... ASP pages are fine.
I had the same "issue"... but still prefer to do the local development and manually upload via FTP. I'm just one of those who isn't too comhy giving up control.
-AC
Andrew Connell
IM on MSN
andrew@aconnell.com
|
|
|
|
|
... in WebServices?
I mean for years we tried to implement encryption on data that go through port 80 (like SSL), and now WebServices enable us to send even more sensitive data over HTTP!
Have designers thought about it and can webservices be more secure. Obvioulsy they can be as secure as HTTP, but really that's not much.
Anybody have any ideas on this ?
Regards,
Venet.
--------
Black holes are where God divided by zero.(Steven Wright)
|
|
|
|
|
Actually there seem to be some security extensions of SOAP.
This documnets describes it:
http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-dsig
Regards,
Venet.
--------
Black holes are where God divided by zero.(Steven Wright)
|
|
|
|
|
Just had a chat with 2 guys from MS and they suggested I look at Trustbridge too.
It's one of those things that if you need to develop a solution now, then it won't help. 
Cheers,
Simon
"Sign up for a chance to be among the first to experience the wrath of the gods.", Microsoft's home page (24/06/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
The scenario I'm facing is this:
We develop a set of web services that we consume from ASP.NET. After a couple of years, the web services get reimplmented with J2EE, et al...
Is it feasible to think that the ASP.NET apps won't need to get recompiled/partly redone?
Would the WSDL be identical between these 2 different platforms.
Cheers,
Simon
"Sign up for a chance to be among the first to experience the wrath of the gods.", Microsoft's home page (24/06/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
hi there,
i am a beginner using .NET, can anybody give me some hint
on how to use .NET to develop a Palm application.
Any installer i need to install before start develop.
thanks
regards, Tho
|
|
|
|
|
Thought I'd chime in since you haven't had any replies yet...
Currently it isn't possible because with .NET (as with Java) you need a runtime that will interpret the IL code (CLR in .NET, JVM in Java). As far as I know, there is no Palm CLR in development, but I could be wrong... check the open source sources for this. I seriously doubt Microsoft will undertake this project as they'd rather support their CE platform (look up the CompactFramework on MSDN).
-AC
Andrew Connell
IM on MSN
andrew@aconnell.com
|
|
|
|
|
Unless Palm releases a 64MB handheld, it's probable that a .NET runtime for the Palm will never happen. My m100 has only 2MB of memory, and even the largest memory capacity the I've heard of on a Palm (16MB) still wouldn't really be enough. The .NET runtime was built with C#, and the Palm documentation says upfront that you should be weary of object orientated programming due to the memory restrictions. Frankly, if you want to do OOP for the Palm, I'd suggest mobileStudio[^], which provides a fairly MFC like framework, compiles relatively small for a object orientated system, and only costs $29.95 to register (the nearest competitor is over $100).
Jamie Nordmeyer
Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|
|
|
|
Would anyone here be able to tell me if uploading a file from a client to a server using a webservice is possible, and of course there would be a client program contacting the webservice. Is this possible? Or would i have to fiddle with remoting etc?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm presuming this is for a Win32 environment and not web?
If for Win32, maybe have a look at the Stream objects as a way to move a file around.
Cheers,
Simon
"Sign up for a chance to be among the first to experience the wrath of the gods.", Microsoft's home page (24/06/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, thank you I'll check into streams.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know much about web services cause I usually use remoting. But try passing the filestream to the server as a parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
Hope this is the right forum for this sort of question...
We've been running VC 6.0 and are considering upgrading. My boss has a dual CPU machine, and VC 6.0 doesn't take advantage of it because the compiler is not multithreaded. We were wondering if this has been address for the .NET version of the compiler. Anyone got any ideas on this?
Chistopher Duncan
Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
|
|
|
|
|
While compiling my CPU usage goes over 50% on my dual, but not to 100%
This means that it is not multithreaded, but some tasks are being done in seperate processes. I would assume the compiler is some sort of console utility running in the background, with VS listening and echoing (which takes cycles from the tool on a single cpu).
And performance isnt the only reason to go dual!
Being able to use photoshop, browse the net, review code, etc. while vs.net does its thing is just as valuable.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. Yeah, that's the same behavior we noted in 6.0. Oh, well...
Christopher Lord wrote:
And performance isnt the only reason to go dual!
Being able to use photoshop, browse the net, review code, etc. while vs.net does its thing is just as valuable.
Which is the reason, of course, that he went dual. Er, did I mention he was the boss? (In fairness, we all have screaming machines and ours, while not dual, have faster CPUs that actually build the system quicker than his. I think we got the better end of the deal.)
Thanks, man!
Chistopher Duncan
Author - The Career Programmer: Guerilla Tactics for an Imperfect World (Apress)
|
|
|
|
|
By Microsoft's own admission, the C# compiler is not much of an optimizer. I need to get a particular class working blazing fast, so I'm using ildasm to get the IL, modifying it and ilasm-ing it back to a PE.
I need to know what's a faster way to push two references to the current object onto the stack:
ldarg.0
ldarg.0
OR
ldarg.0
dup
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to ask a dumb question:
If you're requiring performance only, why not go for C++ (or even inline C) ?
I don't see the benefit of doing IL manually.
Cheers,
Simon
"Every good work of software starts by scratching a developer's personal itch.", Eric S. Raymond
|
|
|
|
|
After disassembling the Managed C++ code, I realized that I can optimize it better than the compiler. However, the MC++ included some native code which can't be disassembled with ildasm so I can't compile it with ilasm. Besides, since the stuff is managed, it doesn't really matter what language I write in; I like C#.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it does. Only memmory is managed, but the Managed C++ code is more optimized that C#, actually I think is the only optimized language from .NET. Also with managed you can combine managed and unmanaged code so you can obtain native code for real time actions.
Best regards,
Alexandru Savescu
|
|
|
|
|
Could you direct me to where ms says mc++ is more optimized?
I cant seem to find reference to that.
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd part is faster since dup doesn't need to be verified and it's considered type safe 
Cheers,
Joao Vaz
The loved ones never really leave us , they are always alive on our hearts and minds.
|
|
|
|
|
And since you are interested in Il, check the Ecma-335 specificationthat deals with the Commom Language Infrastructure, in which IL instruction set belongs, here Common Language Infrastructure
Cheers,
Joao Vaz
The loved ones never really leave us , they are always alive on our hearts and minds.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think there will be any observable difference between the two. I will really be surprised if your hand optimization gives you more speed than the unoptimized code.
I have never wasted time worrying about such insignificant things. Keep your eye upon the donut and NOT upon the hole. - Bill Sergio about posting in the right forum. The Lounge - June 23, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Excuse my (!knowledge ) of WebServices.
Let's say I have a simple WebService that accepts 2 integers and give you back the result of addition.
What's the way to make this service known to other applications. Do you need to setup some central server, so it would keep track of all services (let's say in an Intranet), or is there a standard way to do it ?
Thanks
Venet.
--------
Black holes are where God divided by zero.(Steven Wright)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
