|
Hi,
I have not tried it, but I would if WIA was in my way:
- Start/Run: services.msc
- Select Windows Image Acquisition
- Click "Stop"
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
*laugh* I think about doing that night and day! The problem is when I completely disable the WIA service I can't get to the camera at all. With System.IO not working cameras / video devices I need to keep WIA running but want to kill that damn Autoplay window!
I'd sure love to take a bat to the person who decided to remove camera drive volume access from System.IO. I understand WIA has advanced functionality but why completely remove file based access to cameras and devices which essentially are removable storage volumes?! I've spent far too long learning WIA just to get a few files off cameras when I could have done this entire project in a day using System.IO.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, so I should expect the same trouble if and when I decide to switch to Vista. 
Any luck with Richard's TweakUI suggestion?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Luc, apparently it didn't help. However, I was curious of the activities when a USB Hard Drive newly inserted into USB port (PC never seen this device before), when, using SysInternals Process Monitor. Why, you get similar windows reaction if you insert a USB Hard Drive as you would if you insert any USB device including Cameras, and the amount of data recorded was astounding. It was still astounding after filtering. Registry Activity exported to a CSV file is 790KB and File Activity exported to a CSV file is 212KB. And all of that activity within a matter of seconds.
Having had a look at those activity entries, and the other stuff that Process Monitor records, it is, frankly, far too much time consumption just to find the odd entry of interest. But if anybody wants to analyse those activity files, i'll make them available minus any recorded personalised data items.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Backing up a removable disk to the registry? That's a novel idea. 
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing of the sort. Novel if it were true.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I wanted to know how we can differentiate between old and new xp os.
What are the version numbers for each?
By old and new i mean that in one any one can access C:\Program Files and make changes.But in new only admin can make change to C:\Program Files.
I hope i am right in my understanding
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the new and the old os xp version is that, the old xp os
has only limits in terms of updated services, while the newer release now has a lot of services being installed into ur drive whether it is useful or not to your program. that is how, many of us has its own questions why my pc is too slow for my machine that has a 2.66ghz speed, 512mb of ram and intel boards?
i hope that this would be a help. 
THANKS TO: LINUX SLACKWARE, for releasing the new version of slackware.
|
|
|
|
|
The two major editions are Windows XP Home Edition, designed for home users, and Windows XP Professional, designed for business and power-users.
Windows XP 64-bit Edition - Designed specifically for Itanium-based workstations.
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
Not to be confused with the previous 64-bit Itanium edition of Windows XP, this edition is based on Windows Server 2003 and supports x86-64 extension of the Intel IA-32 architecture.
Windows XP Media Center Edition - Designed for media center PCs.
Windows XP Tablet PC Edition - Specially designed notebook/laptop computers called tablet PCs, the Tablet PC Edition is compatible with a pen-sensitive screen, supporting handwritten notes and portrait-oriented screens.
Windows XP Embedded
An edition for specific consumer electronics, set-top boxes, kiosks/ATMs, medical devices, arcade video games, point-of-sale terminals, and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) components.
SAJAN A PILLAI
C#.NET Programmer
TELESOFT INDIA PVT LTD...
BANGALORE
"Winners don't do different things. They do things differently. ...
|
|
|
|
|
Start-->Run
type in the box winver.exe
Then google the version number.
“If we are all in agreement on the decision - then I propose we postpone further discussion of this matter until our next meeting to give ourselves time to develop disagreement and perhaps gain some understanding of what the decision is all about.”-Alfred P. Sloan
|
|
|
|
|
Just look at the differences between the versions when you run winver.exe...
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all.
Is a windows service running under LocalSystem account capable of creating a hidden window, thus it can receive windows messages from the OS or the rest of the windows, even if it is not interactive?
I am writing a service using asynchronous sockets and I wonder if such sockets mechanism would work to a system service.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. What is keeping you from trying it and looking for the result/error/exception?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
this months tips:
- use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
|
|
|
|
|
Services can create hidden windows as long as they are created with the interactive flag. Interactive Services[^]
Asynchronous (non-blocking) sockets, per se, work fine. I've never used the built-in socket classes (CSocket or CAsyncSocket) - I've always written my own since I don't like using the windows message loop as my notification mechanism.
Judy
|
|
|
|
|
I have an icon in the tasktray that won't go away. It keeps poping up a security alert from some stuck software there by Antivirgear.
How do I remove it? I have scaned the registry and have removed all references that I could find. I have search all the files, removed all the files it instaled, etc.
The World as we think we know it Has a lot more to it than meets the eye.
A Mad Scientist who has seen it for himself....
|
|
|
|
|
Well... reinstall the software that sends the icon. Also: It may be a Windows Security center alert. Then you will have to go to the security center, warning options and disable the "alert me if no antivir was found" option.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
"If it was two men, the non-driver would have challenged the driver to simply crash through the gates. The macho image thing, you know." - Marc Clifton
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite what I had in mind. The software is just a ploy to get one to spend money via credit card and then...So reinstalling bad software is not the answer. Thank you for trying.
The World as we think we know it Has a lot more to it than meets the eye.
A Mad Scientist who has seen it for himself....
|
|
|
|
|
The_Inventor wrote: ...some stuck software there by Antivirgear.
How do I remove it?
Have you used Task Manager to look for an application or process named such?
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
That and more. I am looking for the spot in the sysem that this "errorware" leaves its head. Much like a intestinal tape worm, one might get and kill all of the body, but not the head that has the hooks to keep it in the system somewhere, probable some 'system' attributed file. The head then regenerates the body using the hosts resources.
The World as we think we know it Has a lot more to it than meets the eye.
A Mad Scientist who has seen it for himself....
|
|
|
|
|
|
This so far seems the best reply... However upon inspection of the manual method of removal, mind you I am kinda anal about what is on my hard drive, I found their list of *.dll's to be suspect. I did some discretionary searching. I searched for all the DLL's on my system. I never really thought I had that many. (18,000+) I made only a cursory comparison between their list and what MyComputer found. I have looked in many places. I keep finding new/old places I hadn't looked before. It is no wonder most people just 'use' their computer for simple things and no experimentation. In my case I was downloading a new batch of CODEC's to try out for quality of compression vs. file size and ease of use. It had been about a year since my CPU had its own access to the net. I forgot what trouble some like to brew. Anyway, while I did download the Free scanner (didn't say anything removal) I haven't installed it yet. I have installed Window's Defender program as a stop gap for the time being. Hopefully it will keep anything new from poping up with panic alerts.
P.S. I did send them an email. It seems to have been somewhat effective. The previous time when I booted up and got the icon in the tray, and then went on-line, after about ten to twenty minutes went by then my screen went black, the box rebooted itself, and when everything had finised reloading the nasty, irritating icon was GONE.
Joy to the world... then the next evening the irritating icon was back, and didn't go away. Yet this evening I had my registry up, my on-line email access to follow the instruction for removal, and explorer was up, so I could check each registry entry it suggested, etc. regedt32.exe froze and I could close it. The other programs were still OK and weren't hanging. I pressed reset. After rebooting and everything being loaded, the irritating nasty tray icon is gone again. Go for good...we will see...
The World as we think we know it Has a lot more to it than meets the eye.
A Mad Scientist who has seen it for himself....
|
|
|
|
|
The_Inventor wrote: Window's Defender
I have tried that, and my experiences with it was unsatisfactory. You could say that my opinions are that it was a waste of time.
Anyhow, keep us informed of your progress in destroying this "nasty"
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, MS Windows Defender is not the most agressive. I did try SpyHunter 2.9 from EngimaSoftware. It seems to be a honest scanner, with a link to its removal tool for money.
It gave a report that was valid, which I did use, with success, to eliminate the unwanted entries in the registry, and other locations of offinding dll's. I had the 'errorware' 95% removed, this free scanner did help me find the rest of the mess. I can now say I am currently 'Master of My Machine'.
The World as we think we know it Has a lot more to it than meets the eye.
A Mad Scientist who has seen it for himself....
|
|
|
|
|
helo, have a nice evening..
i'm asking u f what operating system u r using. like for example u r using any of the winxp. the icon in the tasktray is normally displayed for the machine that has a new installed programs such as ms_office, foxit reader, antivirus and many more. to make it simple,just click start -> run -> type the word "msconfig", -> click startup tab, uncheck or disable all the startup items that except the
antivirus, click ok and restart.
i hope this would help u...
THANKS TO: LINUX SLACKWARE, for releasing the new version of slackware.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anybody have an idea why the explorer crashes every single time I enter a folder containing videos (any format *.avi, *.mpeg , etc)? It's pretty annoying and makes simple tasks very hard to do.
I am fighting against the Universe...
Reference-Rick Cook
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
