|
Unforunately we're flat out tidying up last minute core functionality but a histogram is one of the first things I plan on seeing if we can efficiently include.
Everything's being tuned for load so we've had to put off some fun stuff until we are sure it won't impact too much. At the worst we'll just use some clever caching
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
hello,
I've seen many forums over the internet whose posts are shown in google when u try to search for any given problem but I havent seen the posts on the Code project forums being directly accessible thru Google. I know there is a searching facility with in the article/Forums but I think it would be really nice if these posts could be made available globally thru Google.
What do u say abt that
Cheers...
Rocky
You can't climb up a ladder with your hands in your pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
I think spiders are turned off through robots.txt or a similar means. My other guess would be because of too much of dynamic URLs like querystrings, Google is just visiting the main page and going away.
I feel, a CP admin should be able to better advise on this anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
yea ur right thats the issue I want them to think abt
Rocky
You can't climb up a ladder with your hands in your pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted about that long time back.. suggestions[^].. they are working on it..
Michael Sync wrote:
#7. Search Engine friendly
As a software developer, I do googling a lot... Even thought microsoft asp.net forum and other forum shows in search result, I never see our forum (codeproject) in Google. Why is it happening like that? Is our forum not Google friendly?
Chris Maunder wrote:
All answer #7 first: The entire site is being rewritten (and is, in fact, currently in beta) in ASP.NET. A massive ground up rewrite that has taken a year and was done in order to finally get over the hurdle of ASP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks alot
cheers... bye
Rocky
You can't climb up a ladder with your hands in your pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
We're looking into this one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
ok thats wonderful
Cheers...
Rocky
You can't climb up a ladder with your hands in your pockets.
|
|
|
|
|
I know there are already a few out there but the ones I've seen only have a few members, all in favour say aye!
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont --- I dunno who
|
|
|
|
|
Nay.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Nay.
Why
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont.
|
|
|
|
|
smyers wrote: Why
Two reasons:
1. It was a joke icon.
2. Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: 1. It was a joke icon.
I saw that
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: 2. Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
There will never be enough popular demand if everybody jokes and replies nay. I think a Sharepoint forum is a good idea.
There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who dont.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Forums should only be added if there is enough popular demand.
In that case, I feel CP should put up a Forum Request Poll and keep adding the topics that are being requested. I feel the most common topics that are being requested are:
1) Sharepoint
2) Silverlight
3) Php (Non Microsoft)
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: Php (Non Microsoft)
That's only bradml and his many aliases.;)
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I reckon a forum on Women / Wives. Never been able to understand mine, even after 18 years, and need considerable help at times.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: Nay
Well said. The first priority should be to have a Sonia Gupta forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: The first priority should be to have a Sonia Gupta forum.
Too bloody right it should.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Currently the use of images as custom bullets in lists in articles is disallowed in global.css. Would you re-consider this for UL lists? As an example, here is a list of 3 items, once with custom bullets, the second time with standard bullets: [^]
I believe this would be helpful in the visual presentation of articles - for example, use of red, yellow, green bullets to indicate different states, levels, etc.
Of course, this could also be accomplished with TABLEs, but using UL is a lot more concise and maintainable. The html would look like:
<ul style="list-style-image: url('MyArticle/blueball.gif')">
-- modified at 6:37 Monday 5th November, 2007
I have updated my XHtmlTree article[^] to show what these image bullets look like in an actual article.
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't people be able to abuse that to post images though?
My current favourite word is: Waffle
Cheese is still good though.
|
|
|
|
|
As I said, the same thing could also be accomplished by inserting images in TABLEs, so there are other ways to "abuse" posting images that cannot be prevented. The only thing that disallowing images in ULs does is to prevent legitimate use of images.
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent suggestion, Hans 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Got it fixed... A SPAN tag found it's way in somehow, which tweaked a font.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walton wrote: Got it fixed...
Cool. Went to your article and didn't see it until I saw you fixed it. Very nice article, btw.
"Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
