|
I have "using system.configuration;"
|
|
|
|
|
And you need a reference to System.Configuration.dll
|
|
|
|
|
Added a reference, Still dont have any System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings. Which is what its saying System.Configuration.ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings was replaced by. :/
|
|
|
|
|
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.configuration.configurationmanager.aspx[^]
ConfigurationManager Class
Provides access to configuration files for client applications. This class cannot be inherited.
Namespace: System.Configuration
Assembly: System.Configuration (in system.configuration.dll)
Wierd, it definatly lives there in the framework. Just for sanitys sake could you try creating a compleatly new project in a solution, adding that reference and try to access ConfigurationManager?
|
|
|
|
|
Still doesn't work. Maybe my company doesn't have the latest updates for VS installed? *shrug*
|
|
|
|
|
What version of Visual Studio are you using?
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give." --Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I know this is not related to programming, but here goes:
I have a program that requires .Net framework 1.1.4322 to be installed, while I have the latest 3.5 beta from VS Orcas.
Is there any way to trick the program into accepting my computer?
All of my programs are downloadable at fahadsadah.co.nr
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, you could. But then your app would probably fall on it's face anyway since there are breaking changing between .NET 1.1 and 2.0 and 3.0 and 3.5...
Just download and install the .NET 1.1 Redistributable and save yourself that hassle of trying to "force" the thing to work.
All versions of the .NET Framework can be installed side-by-side with no problems. You can install 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 all at the same time...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much!
All of my programs are downloadable at fahadsadah.co.nr
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: save yourself that hassle of trying to "force" the thing to work
Kind of like pounding a square peg through a round hole :->
"Try asking what you want to know, rather than asking a question whose answer you know." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
HI,
Here i'm new to .net and need to develope good notes and graphical tool for
newbies in dotnet so the student can get clear idea of framework and also can recall important things quickly.
I just need to know a simple ebook which help me in getting all .net basics
like what is class,struct,interface,abstract class and all.
Please let me know any link or else as early as possible.
i will also like to have a list of different categories with details, such as
databind controls, different editing controls , different types of controls with its uses such as listview,datagrid,combo,etc
please let me know any link or material you know...
Thanks in advance.
Setram Bhardwaj
Software Enginer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Setram,
Try learning all of these basics from MSDN itself. Here is a link from where you may start:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/hi-in/library/default.aspx
Otherwise, you can search for Free Tutorials on .NET and I am sure you will get loads of information.
Regards,
Amit Pal
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone ,
Which of the following approach is more suggestible - nested if or a do - while with break statement , while performing large number of validations
|
|
|
|
|
these two suggestions are usually for totally different situations.. a nested if has no repetition, unlike a do/while loop.. using a do/while loop just for validation (with no need for repetition) seems like a bad idea..
provide some more details as to what your looking for.. also, have you considered case statements?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am running a Web Application on C#.
I have a site with a dedicated IP address - say xx.xx.xxx.xx
Now the application running on the server is made to fetch a URL request - from a site which will accept Hosts originating from specific IP addresses only.
What is happening is whenever the request is being made - the server is picking up one of the many IP addresses available in its pool to fetch the request and thus not validating and getting a Host Authorization Failure.
Is their any setting which I can make in Web.config or anything which I could do so that I can bind my dedicated IP to be the outgoing server request IP address !!!
PLEASE HELP !!!
Regards,
Ani 
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't cross post.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Cross Post as in ??? ...
Any suggestions or solution !!! ....
|
|
|
|
|
Posting the same question in multiple forums. Most of the people here who answer questions regularly visit all the forums, not just one or two.
Also, posting in multiple forums makes it very difficult for multiple people to collaborate on an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
You asked the same question in the Vista forum. Pick the appropriate forum instead of posting the same message throughout several others.
"Try asking what you want to know, rather than asking a question whose answer you know." - Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
KEWL ...
THANX - HAVE DELETED MY POST FROM VISTA FORUM !!!
BY THE WAY ANY SOLUTIONS / SUGGESTIONS FROM ANYONE !!!
|
|
|
|
|
Using .Net 2.0...
I'm using System.Diagnostics, but there is not "Process" item according to intellisense. Did MS move it to another assembly?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Did MS move it to another assembly?
No, they didn't. Either add using System.Diagnostics; to the usings and then you will have access to Process class in your source code file or just write the full name when you need to access process class
System.Diagnostics.Process pr=new System.Diagnostics.Process();
|
|
|
|
|
I've tried it both ways. I even went ot see if I needed to add a reference to system.diagnostics, and the assembly isn't referenceable that way.
So, now what?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Something must be broken because it's there.
|
|
|
|
|
led mike wrote: Something must be broken because it's there.
Saying that a Microsoft product is broken is like looking at a flat tire and saying there's no air in it. 
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
