|
I just posted a pointer invitation note in GetTogether Forum to a Lounge Post over here: http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=2219014&forumid=217394&mode=all&userid=52123#xx2219014xx[^]
I could see them from my profile 'Messages Posted'. However, the GetTogether Forum does not show it. My purpose of posting it over here as a pointer note to the Lounge is as follows:
1) Messages in Lounge appear and disappear very fast. GetTogether is a special forum and hence more Chennai CPians can get a watch of it at least on Monday morning.
Is there any moderation that applies to 'GetTogether' forum or caching effects? Any CPian who is able to see the post by just clicking 'GetTogether' forum link without using the permalink I have given. When I go directly to GetTogether forum, I just get Chris' instructional message and nothing else.
|
|
|
|
|
Set the "Messages since" drop down to "All" and click on the Set button - you should see all the messages. Set to "Last month" doesnt seem to work
This does look like a bug?
|
|
|
|
|
True. The message which I posted on Sunday was not visible on Sunday itself!
|
|
|
|
|
|
First off, the link that you've provided is incorrect. Second, I've never had problems while editing a post with Unicode in it. I am pretty sure you're doing something wrong there.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
Post a tamil or other unicode proverb in a message. Then choose 'Modify' Link.
In the latter case it appears with the Unicode numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really think it's really has to be a proverb to reproduce this bug? You seriously need some sleep!
ககக போ
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
Just stroke my mind and I tested. It works just perfect with CPhog. Without CPhog, I too have this issue!
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->ßRÅhmmÃ<-·´¯`·.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking into this now. A fix will probably have to wait for the next version
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Someone posted something in the C# forum that breaks the html code. The page ends in a middle of a post.
The reason that this happens all the time is of course the backwards way that is used to try to protect against html code. Why don't you change this once and for all?
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
IE shows the whole page so it's an issue with Firefox I guess. The page ends at "Sharepoint server URL" topic. It seams that there is some url posted that breaks the page
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Guffa wrote: Why don't you change this once and for all?
It will be once the new forum software is finished and debugged.
--
If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: It will be once the new forum software is finished and debugged.
That sounds great.
---
single minded; short sighted; long gone;
|
|
|
|
|
dan neely wrote: It will be once the new forum software is finished and debugged.
Oh come on, Dan - that was Chris's standard response! Stop stealing his lines
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Newly i received a mail that said my article is blocked by some countries!!
So i want to know that, can you codeproject web masters move the article to directory.
I think with this way the article will goes unblock!!
Article: http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/asproxy.asp
Very
|
|
|
|
|
SalarSoft wrote: I think with this way the article will goes unblock!!
Not likely, since it's already in a directory.
It probably has more to do with the content of the article. An article about getting around a blocking firewall being blocked?? How ironic...
|
|
|
|
|
As you see this article is about passing the web filtering mechanisms. So they might have problem with hole article and tool discussed in it.
He says that just the http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/asproxy.asp address blocked but other codeproject pages is unblock.
So if you move this article to "aspnet" directory i think it might be unblock
I will try to remove friction words from the article.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm quite sure the directory the article is in is not the problem.
It's entirely possible their firewall is kicking the request based on content.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: It's entirely possible their firewall is kicking the request based on content.
Absolutely no! In this case it seems just that url is blocked and other pages is unblocked.
Man, i worked with all these mechanisms(if no, how did i wrote anonymouser?) and in this case
just one url of codeproject pages is in black list.
After all take it easy.
I want to know why the article is still marked as "unedited reader contribution" with points of "Popularity: 6.32. Rating: 4.16 out of 5" ?
I saw topics with rating 1 and popularity 2 that was edited.
Thanks for your time.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say, a CP-editor should also see this article at an earliest lest some system administrator somewhere should not view CP as a website holding content supporting hackers. On that perspective, I think this issue assumes mammoth importance.
|
|
|
|
|
SalarSoft wrote: my article is blocked by some countries
The subject of the article itself says 'without government filtering '. I think hence the system administrators there are viewing it with suspicion on it whether it is a hacking tool to bypass the security practices in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: I think hence the system administrators there are viewing it with suspicion on it whether it is a hacking tool to bypass the security practices in place.
Ok. I changed the subject (and a little change in article word dictionary) and i hope it affects (especially the minds).
|
|
|
|
|
The article seems to be good, at least from the learner's perspective, though implementation on a large scale involves a lot of other non-technical legal and copyright etc procedures. Isn't it?
Nevertheless, there are a few suggestions I have put over there with respect to Access Control, Bandwidth Throttle etc.
|
|
|
|
|
:->
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: though implementation on a large scale involves a lot of other non-technical legal and copyright etc procedures. Isn't it?
Don't know! may be!
I think it shouldn't has any problem. According to the license agreement there is no warranty of any kind of use.
Read license: http://asproxy3.somee.com/license.txt[^]
|
|
|
|