.NET (Core and Framework)

public MyMethod(SomeObject obj)
{
    MyReferenceType rt = new MyReferenceType(); // Assume this goes on the stack
    obj.PropertyToKeep = rt;
    // Method ends, the stack is unwinds as anything on it is taken off.
}

Luc Pattyn wrote:

Micro$oft

Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

Microsoft is a business. It is their job to make money and they happen to be very good at it.

<br />
namespace Simple  {<br />
    class Program {<br />
        static void Main(string[] args)<br />
        {<br />
           Console.WriteLine("that's the program");<br />
           int a = 0;<br />
           myClass mc = new myClass();            <br />
        }<br />
    }<br />
}<br />

MarKus0 wrote:

So, it's the OS that allocate space on the stack for the process?!

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

It's the processor that's stopping you from doing what you want, not the .NET Framework or the O/S.

Luc Pattyn wrote:

- alternatively, if the CPU offers stack support (i.e. pushes the PC to a memory
location thru a pointing register) and you don't like the way it works, you can
undo it by software, and keep track of program flow in some other way.

MarKus0 wrote:

but will it be possible?

<br />
value class classB {<br />
private:<br />
	int value;<br />
<br />
};<br />
classeB^ bHeap = gcnew classeB(); //on managed heap<br />
classeB bStack;  //on managed stack<br />

MarKus0 wrote:

what does CLR do to allocate bHeap and bStack (I mean the difference)?