|
Hey friends,
That problem solved by deleting coockies. Thanks to the first poster in this question.
Now even this page in msdn gives me message like this and i am not able to find the edit profile button:
"Welcome back! It doesn't appear that you've filled out your profile. You can do so by clicking on the Edit Profile button above."
Link[^]
I don't know what wrong with M$, whether its the difference between MSDN and MSDN2?
Jwalant Soneji (BE IT)
Mobile: +91 9969059127
http://jnsoneji.spaces.live.com
http://jnsoneji.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
sorry found it there on the top only...:->
Jwalant Soneji (BE IT)
Mobile: +91 9969059127
http://jnsoneji.spaces.live.com
http://jnsoneji.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
M$?
"We are all repositories for genetically-encoded information that we're all spreading back and forth amongst each other, all the time. We're just lousy with information."
- Neal Stephenson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i now finally found out, that all my problems with my network
and networking tcp/ip, routing, bridging, etc, depend on a dead
network device or some corrupted device entries inside the windows
registry. I am nearly 100% sure that this is my problem. Now, how can
i locate the "malfunctioning" device and remove it by hand, since removing
all my network devices with device manager and reinstalling them did not
solved my problem. Even reinstalling drivers and protocolls worked. So
this must be done by hand. When i remove all my NIC devices from my
system and all protocolls / drivers and everything depending on them, i
am sure that there are some values inside the Registry left from earlier
used Virtual TAP Devices or other NICs i used in the past. So how can
i locate them and remove them by hand?
Thanks in advance,...
Regards
K.
|
|
|
|
|
Be sure to go to add/remove programs and remove the software for the "dead" wireless device.
"We are all repositories for genetically-encoded information that we're all spreading back and forth amongst each other, all the time. We're just lousy with information."
- Neal Stephenson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi User,
Have please post question your here?
You make not lazy keyboard with.
"We are all repositories for genetically-encoded information that we're all spreading back and forth amongst each other, all the time. We're just lousy with information."
- Neal Stephenson
|
|
|
|
|
I am using the WatCom Compiler to build the Binary along with the Visual Studio 2005 IDE in windows. Can you please suggest me the other Compiler which can build the Binary in both Linux and Windows?
jeet3in
|
|
|
|
|
The default Microsoft .NET SDK csc (C#) in Windows and Mono SDK for Linux. Wouldn't that address the requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually my purpose is to build binary for linux.
but i want to develop it under windows.
as i am using Watcom compiler with windows and by setting some Enviornment Variables it is possible for me to do so.
So, please suggest me any other compiler which is able to build binary for linux under windows.
Thanking you,....
Thanks a lot.
Jeet3in
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on a small Windows application that will, among other things, periodically connect to some databases (mostly SQL Server) to determine that the databases are available. It's basically an early warning system in case of system outages.
The problem is that some of the databases are ones that the average user doesn't use and has no access to, so connecting and opening will always fail for them.
What I need to be able to do is have the application use different credentials while still using Windows Authentication, I don't want to change the connection strings.
My first thought was to have two processes: one in the background gathering information and storing it in an XML file, the other displaying the information, but I'd prefer to have only one process involved.
I was hoping I could have the application run under some other user, but I haven't figured out how.
The closest I came required the user to type in the password of the other user, which is not a clean solution.
I also tried setting the System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal, but although it didn't fail, it also didn't work.
Any other ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
Why go through the entire permissions complication at all? Create a web service that connects to the database using it's own security and connection string. The applications would, every once in a while, just ask the web service if everything is OK.
|
|
|
|
|
It adds an extra layer of complication? It would fail if IIS and/or the Web server were down even though the database server and database may be healthy?
I'd prefer to have as few layers as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: It adds an extra layer of complication?
So does impersonating a second ID. The difference is in which one is simpler to support.
PIEBALDconsult wrote: It would fail if IIS and/or the Web server were down even though the database server and database may be healthy?
The other problem is that your querying the database for a "health status", when if the database is down, that query will also fail, just as a normal user query would. I fail to see the benefit.
|
|
|
|
|
The users are internal, I don't want a failure simply because IIS or some other system is down.
|
|
|
|
|
Run the health-check part of the app as a windows service. You can then specify the credentials.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that was my first thought, I already have some stuff like that, but I was hoping for something simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a bit kludgy, but it works...
In the Main, if the current username isn't the username under which I want to run, I instantiate a System.Diagnostics.ProcessStartInfo, set the appropriate values, and use it to start a new process.
|
|
|
|
|
Does formatting and reinstalling the OS affect the hardisk or any other component of a PC anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean does it do it any physical harm? I suppose any write operation to a disk brings it closer to its eventual end of life, but not in any noticeable way.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Does formatting do anything more than just ordinary write operation?
Thankyou.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe a full format will write once to every sector on the disk, whereas a 'quick format' will just wipe the file allocation table, so all the data remains on disk but cannot be identified by the OS.
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm...by the very nature of the term formatting the HDD[^]it is implied that something more than "just an ordinary write operation" occurs.
"We are all repositories for genetically-encoded information that we're all spreading back and forth amongst each other, all the time. We're just lousy with information."
- Neal Stephenson
|
|
|
|
|
I just added 4 gigs of memory to a Windows 2003 Enterprise Server running on a Dell PowerEdge 2900 dual quadcore processor server. The new memory brought it up to 8 total gigs of memory.
For some reason I'm now getting "low virtual memory" errors which couldn't be farther from the truth. Does anyone have any ideas why?
|
|
|
|
|
Adding more memory requires more descriptors (Page Frame Number database, if memory serves) to describe what's in that memory. The PFN database has to come from non-paged pool, again from memory. It could be that it's one of these other pools of memory that's low.
If this box is running Exchange Server, Microsoft recommend booting with the /3GB switch and the /USERVA switch to fine-tune the virtual address space, and not fitting more than 4GB of RAM. Exchange can't make use of the extra RAM anyway, and you end up wasting some kernel address space to describe the RAM you can't use.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
