|
|
I logged out and cleared cookies and closed the browser. I observed that XYZ now online is decrementing. I think that moment of time a lot of people also were logging out. After launching a new IE, it showed
4,258,386 members and growing! 14,714 now online.
But even after logon, the online count does not increment.
|
|
|
|
|
The value is cached.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
Will it decrement if user closes his browser without pressing logout ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a session count. Sessions expire after 20 mins. the count changes each minute when expired sessions are purged
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean to say that, session_end event will be fired when session is timed out even though he closed the browser. ?
|
|
|
|
|
the session would end even if the user did not close the browser after 20mins.
|
|
|
|
|
Some members have thier display name formatted differently and in different colors. I went to my profile and when I typed HTML into the display name, the CodeProject profile page broke down the UI very badly and I had to revert back the changes.
Where should I customize the Display Name?
|
|
|
|
|
norm <b><font color=#008000>.net</font>
P Think of the environment; please don't print this message unless you really need to.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot norm.
Dr.Luiji
Trust and you'll be trusted.
Cryptography API: The Next Generation (CNG) - How to crypt documents with C++ programming, here.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a bad idea to change the color, it makes the forum look messy!
But maybe it's just me, who think so.
All the best,
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
At least, as of now only a small per centage uses coloring of thier names. So I guess, it is balanced now. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
By mistake a post of mine went to a wrong forum. Since there is now strong patrolling in forums  , I instantly chose to delete it and repost it across the correct one. I think because of slow response, the DELETE button was attempted twice and I got this message:
Wrong Password
Something somewhere has gone haywire, I believe. 
|
|
|
|
|
This is following up Vikram's experience over here on missing out a particular post (http://www.codeproject.com/lounge.asp?msg=2101927#xx2101927xx[^])
I would say instead of just deleting the post after so many less votes have come, the logic should be as follows:
1) Blur the post like http://www.experts-exchange.com/[^] does for not logged on users, till thier subscription is verified.
2) After a while, with moderator/administrator intervention or a specified message expiry, the message can be deleted.
Wouldn't that solve the problem Vikram and others were facing today?
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: I would say instead of just deleting the post after so many less votes have come
The logic for post deletion has nothing to do with the number of 1-votes. It is all to do with people marking it as spam or abuse. It just so happens that a spam or abuse marked post will automatically get a 1-vote also.
Upcoming events:
* Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ...
* Reading: Developer Day 5
Ready to Give up - Your help will be much appreciated.
My website
|
|
|
|
|
The reason for auto-hiding abusive messages is to hide them. Trolls post stuff to get a rise. If you remove the post from everyone and be consistent then they learn there's no point in trolling or spamming. If someone knows that there's a chance many members will still see their post then the disincentive is gone.
You post something abusive or inappropriate in the forums and the community votes it off the island then it's gone. End of story.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Tolerance on the long run might render abusive content being scattered across the forums making it disgusting for readers.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree completely, but what happens when the post that is removed is the opening post in the thread? What I have seen is that all of the responses are still visible but usually get visually associated with another message.
Wouldn't it be better in this case to remove the top (opening) post and all of the responses?
-----------------------------
In just two days, tomorrow will be yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
In the forum message editor, there is a 'Preview' button, which opens up a new window to preview the content that is being typed. I feel that this is an 'extra' burden  to the user clicking a button.
How about having a DIV that automatically keeps previewing the content as it is typed? I would say, the editor itself can be a Rich Text editor too.
|
|
|
|
|
Does it really make that much of a difference?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced User-friendliness basically:
1) One extra-click of a button is avoided.
2) Popup blockers are happy.
|
|
|
|
|
CPHog 
|
|
|
|
|
Ed.Poore wrote: CPHog
Yep. We have to exercise a bit of caution giving preview window since it has to preview the particular Textbox or Editable DIV only.
|
|
|
|
|
What you want a WYSIWYG editor? Like this[^]?
That can perhaps make big text?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
