|
lol, so what are you saying??? that the eclipse UI isn't efficient???
you just need more hardware  
I'm with you though, I've done the same thing (but actually tried to use it), and it ended in the same result. not because my computer couldn't handle it, but because I couldn't figure out what to do with it. its a cool ide, just wish i could figure out how to use it.
|
|
|
|
|
KWrite/Kate
____________________________
I didn't know what to put in here.
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I'm using but I'm not impressed - no macros for instance... I find temporary macros very useful when working with text files.
Thanks,
Michal
|
|
|
|
|
Michal Blazejczyk wrote: I was wandering if someone can point me to a really good text editor under Linux - with a feature set comparable to, say, UltraEdit.
Gnu Emacs can probably do almost anything. It uses a Lisp dialect for add ons, and there are lots of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Vi and VIM are best editors in Linux.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use JEdit, has many many features.
|
|
|
|
|
HtmlKit on windows can do the trick. You can live-edit your files on the Unix/Linux PC from within your Windows desktop. As you click the Save button, the file is FTPed onto the Linux box behind the scenes without any user intervention. The file format can be toggled between Windows/Unix. 
|
|
|
|
|
Why don't just use windows and UltraEdit? 
|
|
|
|
|
It might be a little late but you might want to look at SlickEdit.
Orhun Birsoy
|
|
|
|
|
|
I this this polll is missing most popular editor i.e. Edit Plus.
This editor is by far better and light weight then any of the editors mentioned in the poll.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, EditPlus is my favorite.
"Dinner Out", is a go! 
|
|
|
|
|
I have been using Edit Plus for a very longtime (maybe 7-8 years) and it very good, with syntax coloring etc.
|
|
|
|
|
For those not using notepad ++, if u like me a work with ie view source and view the html output in the default notepad its dull an not at all friendly, notepad ++ overrides the default plain bare bones notepad.
Works for me like a charm,
|
|
|
|
|
Who could possibly WANT to use vi?
Obviously someone who enjoys pain!
|
|
|
|
|
DonDriskell wrote: Who could possibly WANT to use vi?
Obviously someone who enjoys pain!
Heh, I thought the same thing when I first tried ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) however I changed my mind after a while.
Same for vi. Looks horrible until you get to know it and then it is hard to use anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
Vi and Vim are good editors, but if you like consoles
|
|
|
|
|
anuraj.p wrote: Vi and Vim are good editors
They can be made friendly too. It needs a bit of effort. There are configuration files which would persist your preferences. Some vi flavors also have file recovery right?
|
|
|
|
|
vi's good. vi's fast and efficient. It's got a steep learning curve though.
--
A Stern Warning of Things to Come
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am, but that doesn't make vi any worse editor now, does it?
--
Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I've never read the texts of The Church of Emacs before.
--
Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised it's not in the list.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
As am I. I've been using it for about six years now...legally!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
