|
I didn't even try to compile the mess, I just looked at it. That's why the error messages are more to the point than the ones you would get from the compiler:
DateTime dt1=new DateTime(Monday,November 06,2006)
Variable 'Monday' is not defined.
'November 06' is not a valid expression.
There is no constructor for the DateTime structure that takes those arguments.
DateTime dt2=new DateTime(Wednesday,November 08,2006)
Variable 'Wednesday' is not defined.
'November 08' is not a valid expression.
There is no constructor for the DateTime structure that takes those arguments.
if(DateTime.compare(dt1,dt2)<0)
The operator is "Compare", not "compare".
Friend4u wrote: else if(DateTime.compare(dt1,dt2)==0)
The method is named 'Compare', not 'compare'.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to specify a type contraint that operator== is supported?
or any way to deal with that?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Off the top of my head, I can only think of:
where T : System.IComparable<T>
Geor
|
|
|
|
|
It was suposed to work for value types, too 
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at the IEquatable interface.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
peterchen, are you looking to just compare 2 reference types? If so,
bool AreEqual<T>(T first, T second)
where T : class
{
return first == second;
}
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted it to work for both reference nad value types, and use overloaded comparison operators if any - but that doesn't seem possible in C#.
I've replaced the template type with object, and use IComparable if implemented, otherwise I fall back to comparing the references.
thank you.
Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Velopers, Develprs, Developers!
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify!|Fold With Us!
|
|
|
|
|
You have to use the IEquatable interface.
More information on the "operator in generics" problem: www.codeproject.com/csharp/genericnumerics.asp[^]
Quote: The solution uses the fact that constraining type parameters using interfaces is not the same as casting to interfaces. Calling a method using an interface has the overhead of dynamic method dispatch, but calling a method on a type parameter that is constrained by an interface has no such overhead.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
Let me know about the basics of windows Remoting & COM programming.Regards.
Raihan Masud
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to take a look here.
Regards,
mav
--
Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...
|
|
|
|
|
i have a webpage with asp button. in server side, i wrote some code for its button click event to delete the page data.
but in client side i want user to confirm the deletion action. so i write this javascript code:
{if(confirm("do want to delete data...."))}
i don't know what to do to prevent page postback for false condition.
what should i do...
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
{if(!confirm("do want to delete data....")) return;
else do();}
|
|
|
|
|
i now 'if' parts and what 'return' does.
the thing that i don't know is how to stop my page from postback. but now i found it. to know that refer to my reply to guffa
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
Return a boolean in the click event of the button:
onclick="return confirm('Delete?');"
If the event returns false, the button click is stopped.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks alot.
but your sample code doesn't work or atleast i couldn't understand you and apply your method.
but i found another method in other forum. here it is...
{
if(confirm('do you want to delete?') return true;
if(document.all && window.event) event.returnValue = false;
return false;
}
it works so much better and do what exactly i wanted.
Thanks Rastgar
|
|
|
|
|
The code that I wrote does work, but the backwards way that this forum uses for "security" changed it. 
Remove the * in the code:
o*nclick="return confirm('Delete?');"
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to make a for statement that displays the divide by sums like this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
4......
2 / 2 =
4 / 2 =
6 / 2 =
8......
Up until 5. How can i make that in a for statement?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
If you want help with your code, don't you think that you should at least make an attempt at writing any first? 
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guffa,
I did! Just didn't worked out. This is what i had
for (int i = 1; i < 11; i++)
{
for(int j = 1; j < 11; j++)
{
answer = i / j;
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
This is okay, why doesn't it work?
Replace answer = i / j; with Console.WriteLine(j/i); to see the output.
Note that I replaced i/j through j/i, so that the divisions have a more readable order.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Greeeg,
I guess it works but not the way i liked it to be.
It suppose to print this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
4 / 1 =
etc.
2 / 2 =
4 / 2 =
6 / 2 =
etc.
3 / 3 =
6 / 3 =
9 / 3 =
etc.
4 / 4 =
8 / 4 =
12 / 4 =
etc.
5 / 5 =
10 / 5 =
15 / 5 =
20 / 5 =
etc.
But instead of printing it like this, it prints this:
1 / 1 =
2 / 1 =
3 / 1 =
etc.
1 / 2 =
2 / 2 =
3 / 2 =
etc
1 / 3 =
2 / 3 =
3 / 3 =
etc
Like this up until "x / 10 =".
Do i have to make anther for statement in those 2 for statements?
|
|
|
|
|
Somehow like this:
for (int i = 1; i < 5; i++)
{
for (int j = 1; j < 5; j++)
{
for (int k = j; k < j*5; k+=j)
{
Console.WriteLine(k + "/" + i);
}
}
}
It's bugged, but I don't know where the error is right now.
Just play around a bit with it.
regards
modified 12-Sep-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thank you, i'll try a few things with it!
|
|
|
|
|
for(int i = 1 ; i < 11 ; i++ )
for(int j = 1 ; j < 11 ; j++ )
Console.WriteLine(j * i + "/" + i);
I think this is simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Adis,
That worked, thank you very much!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
