|
|
Thansk Richard. It is currently in closed beta with a release planned for next week. It won't be free though and it is the only one I have found. We need choice, including OS options like I have for unit testing and CI builds.
|
|
|
|
|
HI
Guys,Can any one let me know how to make the web application DDA(disability discrimination act) compliant, so the disable persons(blind,deaf etc) could also access our web application with out any hinderance, plzzzz reply ASAP,thankx in advnace for ur help.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are able to give specifics about the used Html-Elements, kinds of Java-Script used (if so) and how the styles have been defined? Yep, i can give you an answer.
But only if you also know what kind/version/restrictions of DDA you want to meet and if you are able to define the spectrum of necessary client-platforms (Browser-Types and Versions, OS).
You know, code is poetry, fine and tasty; ...but taste sometimes isn't discussable.
You're Welcome,
Paeth.Claudius-Raphael
|
|
|
|
|
Well
man i am using I.E 6.0 and my O.S is Windows XP, let me know abt the latest version of DDA guide lines, i don't know abt the kind of styles used but html is 4.0, let me know in general different guide lines, thankx in advance once again, plz reply ASAP.
|
|
|
|
|
One more thing man is WCAG 2.0 recomeneded by W3C ? plz reply ASAP , thankx.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, that's the roundabout.
Before i ask you some mo' to see how i can help you, forget about wacg2, these conditions are not able to meet, because there is no browser outside that can render it. By the way wacg2 is a turn-back in my opinion, because it gives a f**k on modularizing site content and consistent stylesheet usage.
So at minimum use a xhtml 1.0 doctype transitional for your pages, so that you can approve that your structure valides. Even better would be the xhtml 1.1 doctype, if you have no necessarity for frames.
Don't forget to call the namespace and set the lang for those browsers that don't render xml.
e.g.:
<!DOCTYPE
html
PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"
>
<html
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
xml:lang="en"
lang="en"
>
So if you wanna still produce for IE 6 downwards and browsers like netscape 4 then just take that header i inserted here and forget about the '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>'-line you probably have seen on W3-Page or inserted by Wysiwyg-Editors, because they make the formerly named browsers running in a quirks-mode, means they try to render with proprietary xml-sets if contained and else treat the whole thing as html 3 to 3.2 instead of the version you set up in doctype.
I think that should be almost the first thing you ever hadda check in every file.
Then the typical discussion about alt-statements in img-tags and the use of the title-attribute. To see what content should be delivered in the alt-attribute you should look up your page twice with opera set to text- or classic-mode, once as author, once as editor.
For real boy, it's better to gimme a hint how deep ya knowledge of all that is, because it is much effort you have to bring in to make a compatible site.
Just precise what you have and what you want and then we'll see what might be made in the next step.
What kind of editors you use? what is the target-system and thing like that?
Well, i really don't know if any of this might have had helped you if you're through with practicing it, but maybe?
Just try it, take your time.
If you got special questions you're free to send me an e-Mail. Please be specific and precisely as you're able if you're asking for help.
You know, code is poetry, fine and tasty; ...but taste sometimes isn't discussable.
You're Welcome,
Paeth.Claudius-Raphael
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I have some HTML code in a file; it contains some JavaScript that includes creating a textarea.
I associate the file with a CHtmlView control in a dialog box, using Navigate2. The dialog box is a typical Windows dialog, built using MFC. All well and good.
Now the issue - I'd like to, depending on what the user types into the JavaScript textarea, get out of that area, and transfer control back to the surrounding Windows dialog.
But once the user clicks in the textarea, it seems they're there for good, 'til they decide to click on some other control. Is there any way to intentionally kick them out of the JavaScript textarea, and back to the surrounding (Windows) dialog?
Thanks for any insight!
~ Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Only one control can have the focus so if you set focus on something else.....
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
How can I determin if we are in the daylightsavings period or not (in javascript)?
I've tried to search the net, but couldn't find anything useful.
I suspect it's a registry setting, but how can you read that out with javascript?
Many thanks in advance !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I went for solutions #1. Although here it isn't that simple because our DLS doesn't fall on a certain date, it starts on the last weekend of October until the last weekend of March  , why they make it that difficult is beyond me  .
|
|
|
|
|
V. wrote: why they make it that difficult is beyond me
That is to avoid switching DLS in the middle of a week.
They have made it easy for people to do the switch, rather than to make it easy for you to implement. 
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Guffa wrote: That is to avoid switching DLS in the middle of a week
that's idd a good reason.
Guffa wrote: They have made it easy for people to do the switch, rather than to make it easy for you to implement.
What, they didn't thought about me? Poor, hard-working software developer?
|
|
|
|
|
Aloha,
Lots of CPians visit my website because of the signature below, but almost everybody escape again immediately 
http://www.whenwillitbe.com
My website is a list of future scenarios (a new scenario is posted every day).
Visitors can vote when they think something will happen and then we can all see some interesting tendencies. Did you for example know that 30% believe that within the next 15 years, all babies in the Western world will be implanted with an RFID chip.
I think it's crazy interesting, but apparently most people don't think like I do (not a surprise really...). What am I doing wrong?
Thanks, Mads
-- modified at 9:40 Monday 2nd October, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
phimix wrote: I think it's crazy
There you go 
(It also doesn't help that your website looks like an advert at first glance. Get rid of the google ads up top unless they really are bringing you money.)
|
|
|
|
|
The ads were something I added this morning. CPians also fleed the scene before I added the ads
The ads are gone now.
|
|
|
|
|
Well to be honest it's bland!! Dull, boring and I personally have no interest in the content.
I probably will never go back again!
In order to have a successful website you should know your target market, and if you have set your target market as CPIANS, and they don't seem to be intrested then start looking else where
"a fool will not learn from a wise man, but a wise man will learn from a fool"
"It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." - Theodore Roosevelt
"Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
My Website || My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree. CPians love conjecturing
|
|
|
|
|
Truly the talks are interesting... I think.
To be really really very true: i don't read them...
8)
What about the titles of the posts? Don't know how they look in other browsers, but in IE 7 the multi-line headings are overlayed, so a wrong line-height possibly given in your stylesheet?
I felt the 'design' of your site is too clean. It would be nice if it is more flashy, like the boulevard version of a national geographic.
It is really disturbing that the polls are UNDER the articles, they should be disabled on load and then faded in by javscript due to a click on a 'more info'/'vote' button (whatever you may call it) or something like that. Or you categorize them and display the newest ones with big big pictures in a column to the left and use the remaining place for a per-page/per-post-view where you put the poll aside aligned to the right.
A coloured background might also be a favor example of catching visitors. Think of black if you just want to have the pictures staying contrastly in front, or any other color that is 'mild' and 'deep'. E.g. an indian yellow or a sunny orange, something like that. If you want to let it glare, then use graphical border-sets around your articles that make them look grabable, handy or something like that.
Just try something, if you have interest to built it up and work massively on it ask me for help by providing some facts about the number of artciles you have, the system it is based on, how much space you have and so on. Possibly we might give it a push?
You know, code is poetry, fine and tasty; ...but taste sometimes isn't discussable.
You're Welcome,
Paeth.Claudius-Raphael
|
|
|
|
|
The next thing I'd do is make the "explanatory" text of the website bolder so that people know what the heck it is about. And visually separate the title of the site from the title of the latest question. I'd also get someone to check your English as it is a bit complicated. You want catchier titles and explanations
I'd also put some colouring into the results, make them stand out a bit.
Finally I'd have a "popular questions" section.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if it's just me, but the basic black and white presentation of the site feels a bit bland - a bit of colour (even if it was just a nicely designed logo at the top) could make people linger long enough to actually "get" it
|
|
|
|
|
I just went to your site and found the concept quite interesting. It would be more interesting though, if there was some sort of background to where the questions had come from. At the moment it is just a list of seemingly random ideas. Where there any articles published that prompted the questions? If so I would have liked to read them.
If you scroll down the page and vote on a question, the page reloads at the top again, instead of remembering the scroll position. That is really annoying, and made me give up on bothering with the questions further down. I am sure there is an easy way of making the page remember its scroll position, but I can't remember how off the top of my head. Google it, or maybe someone here can tell us.
I also agree with an earlier comment that the site is a bit bland, and also needs a bit more explanation about what it is about. It needs a bit more personality.
Words fade as the meanings change, but somehow, it don't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
Boro_Bob wrote: If you scroll down the page and vote on a question, the page reloads at the top again
It didn't for me (using Firefox) - the page transparently (ajax?) refreshed without a page reload.
[edit] The same on IE6 - have you got javascript turned off? [/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
benjymous wrote: have you got javascript turned off?
Yes, I am using Firefox with JavaScript turned off by default. I'd forgotten about that.
Words fade as the meanings change, but somehow, it don't bother me.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
