|
Does anyone know of any known issues with Microsoft IE WebControls? We have
never used WebControls in our project and need to
know if any known security holes exist specific to IE WebControls.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have just started working on SQL Server 2005
and am new to this so if anyone could guide me to
start with this.
Thanks
Pramod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link
Pramod
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Howzit,
I am used to VB .NET. When you type "private sub whatever" and press enter, it creates a nice little nice procedure, with an "end sub" and everything.
In C# when I type for e.g. "private static void whatever" and press enter, it does not automatically put in the braces, is this how C# works? I assumed it would put the braces in automatically? The same applies to typing for e.g. an "if (asdf=1)" statement and pressing enter, should it not put the braces in for me?
Maybe its a setting?
|
|
|
|
|
its all u have to do 
sathy
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't put the braces in for two reasons:
1. C# is not line based, as VB. A new line doesn't mean that the header declaration is complete.
2. In some cases the parenthesis after the parameters is not the last part of the declaration. It would be confusing if the editor would fource the braces in when there still is more things that you can put there.
Example: This is perfectly valid code in C# (if perhaps badly structured):
public
class
A
{
public
A
(
)
:
base
(
)
{
}
}
Notice the call to the base (object class) constructor call after the parameter paranthesis.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
NewbieDude wrote: is this how C# works?
It is how the IDE works.
NewbieDude wrote: I assumed it would put the braces in automatically?
Is it really such a big deal to type two braces?
I tried Visual Assist, which does that sort of thing for you, but I got rid of it because it was just plain annoying.
ColinMackay.net
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucius
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mind typing braces in but I just had to ask! I am really starting to enjoy C# now, its quite an adjustment from VB6 & VB.net
|
|
|
|
|
SCNR: Thats because you are PROGRAMMING now and not SCRIPTING anymore...
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Contra vim mortem non est medicamen in hortem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In C# using excel.Application to output report.But when error happend, the excel can't close. I must write some coding for close excel.When Close excel,a save as dialog been showed.I want to not save the book,I want to close the excel only.How to do it? Can you give me a sample?
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps if you undo actions back to the starting state, you can close Excel without getting the confirmation.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
u can do that by setting the variable of Excel.Workbook to true.
i.e. if u have an object of Excel.Workbook called WB
then just write WB.Saved = true; before closing the application or excel application.
Hope that works for u
Regards,
Pramod
|
|
|
|
|
I post the message in message boards, after this I try to use worksheet.saveas method that save to my driver, then close the worksheet.
app.Workbooks[1].SaveAs(@"c:\temp.xls", Missing.Value, Missing.Value,
Missing.Value,Missing.Value,Missing.Value,
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Excel.XlSaveAsAccessMode.xlNoChange,
Missing.Value,Missing.Value, Missing.Value, Missing.Value, Missing.Value);
app.Application.Workbooks.Close();
app.Application.Quit();
app.Quit();
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.ReleaseComObject (app);
the work sheet been closed, but the process still in task manager until my application been closed. Why?
so ,I more wrote code
Process[] procs = Process.GetProcessesByName("EXCEL");
foreach (Process proc in procs)
{
if (!proc.CloseMainWindow())
{
proc.Kill();
}
}
GC.Collect();
app = null;
At last, the excel porcess been disappeared in task manager.
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at application.DisplayAlerts the .saved can be tricky, and there are situations where the excel doc will toggle it without you explicitly setting it. .Displayalerts suppresses ALL warnings from the excel document, but it definetely gets rid of the "do you want to save" issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I am having a problem with passing data from one form to another.
I have a Main Form, which everything is viewed in, however, sometimes a pop-up may be used for quick items (ie quick add a client).
I have been able to get data to pass forward (Ie parent to pop-up) and reverse (pop-up to parent - using the onclose event) however I cant use a onclose event for a pop-up that is from another pop-up.
For example:
Main Form --> Search Client (doesnt Exist) --> Add Client
I close the search form and need to pass the information in Add Client to the Main Form.
Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers All
|
|
|
|
|
bootn wrote: I have been able to get data to pass forward (Ie parent to pop-up) and reverse (pop-up to parent - using the onclose event) however I cant use a onclose event for a pop-up that is from another pop-up.
Then you need to pass to the popup of the popup the same information that the popup received from the Main Form. In other words, what information are you using in the popup to return the information back to the main form? (The answer to that will give you the information you need to do the same from the popup of a popup)
ColinMackay.net
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucius
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way of Directly accessing a control on the parent form from the 3rd level pop-up (ie a text box)
|
|
|
|
|
bootn wrote: Is there any way of Directly accessing a control on the parent form from the 3rd level pop-up (ie a text box)
This way lies maddness....
One form really ought not to know about another form. (There are some exceptions, like a series of forms that make up a wizard - but even then it probably isn't the best idea)
You should be passing information around using events to notify other forms that data has changed, the other form then has the option to update itself based on those events. You can read this article on passing values between forms[^] to see how to use events to pass information between forms. By doing this you decouple forms from one another which leaves you open to easier changes in the future.
Also, the idea of a third-level popup should be ignored unless the previous popups were modal dialogs. The reason for this is that the user won't see it that way. Popping up forms that can be independently dismissed provides no meaningful heirarchy to the user. When you use modal dialogs you have to dismiss the most recent to get to the previous dialog and so on. This does provide a meaningful heirarchy. So, in your situations all forms are children to the main form.
ColinMackay.net
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in." -- Confucius
"If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him, for an investment in knowledge pays the best interest." -- Joseph E. O'Donnell
|
|
|
|
|
Thanx alot for the help, I have managed to get it to do it the long way (pass throught the "2nd" pop-up
Cheers mate
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, running an app that has to enumerate thru a treeView and create a connection to each node(or pc).
because our network is so large i need to give the users the ablity to close the connection/exit the application prior to the connection closing itself.
The problem i'm running into is that i'm running the treeView enumeration on a separate thread (due to the time/system expense and it was continually locking up the interface) and I can't elegantly kill the thread.
I intermittently receive "Thread was being aborted" when trying to stop/abort the thread. I've searched around and all i can find is related to web redirects, which isn't my problem. I've attempted to follow the msdn directives regarding this but haven't had any luck(thread.join).
I've also tried to look into closing the connection as that would allow the thread to close properly, but i can't find anything on how to close a managementScope object. (I may have not looked hard enought on this part  )
I could use any help that you may offer.
string Beautiful;
Beautiful = "ignorant";
label1.Text = "The world is full of " + Beautiful +" people.";
Why is common sense such an un-common comodity?
|
|
|
|
|
wetrivrrat wrote: The problem i'm running into is that i'm running the treeView enumeration on a separate thread (due to the time/system expense and it was continually locking up the interface) and I can't elegantly kill the thread.
I intermittently receive "Thread was being aborted" when trying to stop/abort the thread.
As long as your applcation is not left in an unusable state, IMO just catching that should be ok. Another idea is to use a bool (perhaps static) value somewhere that u can set to exit the thread. You can also look at some other classes in the Threading namespace, but normally a simple check is enough.
xacc.ide-0.1.2 'Milestone' - includes full source
Now supporting 24 languages including F#, FreePascal/Delphi and VB.NET
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the response,
i've included a small section of the code that deals with the thread abort calls. I guess a bit more description into what i'm receiving may help...
its not so much the initial error, as i could find a creative way to handle it, but its that i'm receiving the error multiple times. So even if i catch the error i'll still have to deal with multiple instances of the same issue.
After watching the system processes I can see that instead of increasing by only one thread, or maybe even two for that matter i'm actually increasing by 4 sometimes 7 while the app is enumerating thru the connection nodes...
this is only a concern because i'm receiving sometimes 3 or more "Thread was being aborted" messages, so i wanted to see why.
I've also tried to capture that message by using a try,catch, but haven't yet found a way to do it. not sure if that has anything to do with the unhandled exception nature of this message or not, but its just odd....
anyhow i'm sure i'm only confusing the situation more by explaining...
case 3:
result = MessageBox.Show("~","Please Verify", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo, MessageBoxIcon.Question );
try
{
if(result == DialogResult.Yes)
{
menuItem42.Visible=true;
menuItem45.Visible=false;
if (PcTree.IsAlive == true)
{
PcTree.Abort();
PcTree.Join();
label1.ResetText();
progressBar1.Value = progressBar1.Minimum;
}
}
}
catch (ThreadAbortException abort)
{MessageBox.Show(abort.Message + abort.StackTrace);}
break;
string Beautiful;
Beautiful = "ignorant";
label1.Text = "The world is full of " + Beautiful +" people.";
Why is common sense such an un-common comodity?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
