|
<font color=blue>enum</font> months {
January = 1,
February = 2,
March = 3,
<font color=green>
December = 12
};
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone! 
OK, I'm not a bad person, I'm just curious about it, I won't do anything bad, but... How do you do all that memory-screwing, MBR-deleting, screen-locking, CPU-slowing, fill-memory-one-byte-at-a-time-in-one-line stuff in C++? Thanks! 
Lord Kixdemp
www.SulfurMidis.com
www.SulfurSoft.tk
[ftp://][http://][hotline://]tsfc.ath.cx
|
|
|
|
|
That's pretty funny.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting a System.TypeLoadException when I try to access an unmanaged opaque struct.
I have an older, unmanaged API - in 'C' actually - and I am trying to access it from managed C++. The header for the api provides me with an opaque pointer to a struct:
typedef struct _table *TablePtr
so I make a call like this: TablePtr CreateTable();
The internals of the struct are hidden in a private header file.
I have this wrapped in managed C++ - so that my class makes this call in it's constructor:
#include "table_pub.h" // has the typedef for opaque TablePtr
private:
TablePtr mytable;
public:
TableClass(void)
{
mytable = CreateTable();
}
When I call this constructor, I get an exception:
An unhandled exception of type 'System.TypeLoadException' occurred in tester.exe
Additional information: Could not load type _table from assembly olf_mydll, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null.
YET, if I include the PRIVATE header for TablePtr - containing the internal structure definition, it works and I don't get the exception. I don't really want to access the private header - can't guarantee that I'll even have that access going forward.
Is there something I can do to say that this unmanaged type is NOT to be loaded?
Thanks
Rich
|
|
|
|
|
In case anyone else is hitting this problem with forward references, I found a solution on another site - all the compiler wants is a definition for the struct - since we don't want to dereference it, all we need to provide is something like this:
#include "table_pub.h" // has the forward reference - typedef struce _table TablePtr;
// now define the struct in the simplest way:
struct _table {};
Rich
|
|
|
|
|
How to gradually add text to multiline EditBox and scrolling its contents to the last line without blinking of the box. (I've done it MFC app but dont know yet how to work with managed control). For a piece of code big thanks.
9ine
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to reengineer a C++ code and Visual basic binary in Windows NT?
Anybody familiar with a tool? Please revert back
|
|
|
|
|
Google for "Win32 Disassembler".
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know where this error message is coming from. It keeps saying that classes and methods aren't where they're supposed to be. Two examples of code that are causing the erros:
this->Icon = (__try_cast<System::Drawing::Icon * >(resources->GetObject(S"icon32.co")));<br />
<br />
MessageBox::Show(S"Error loading Wompi.", S"Loading Error", MessageBoxButtons::OK, MessageBoxIcon::Error);
The first example throws the error C2039: 'GetObjectA': is not a member of 'System::Resources::ResourceManager'
The second throws another C2039: 'MessageBoxA': is not a member etc...
Where is that 'A' coming from? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Sleep is for the WEAK! 
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of functions that take strings have two functions, one that ends in A and one that ends in W ( for ASCII and Wide ). Then you have a macro defined for MessageBox, which defines itself according to the type of project, so that it uses the default type of string in use. This macro is what's causing you trouble. I've had the same hassle recently, I tried to write a class method of 'DrawString'. I changed it to 'WriteString' in the end. Writing code to kill the macro may be a solution when it happens with framework methods.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, is that ever a pain in the ass. I don't really know enough about macros to kill it in this case. Where is it getting the default type of string? From the variable I'm passing maybe? Is there maybe something else I've loaded or option I've broken? I've been having problems with strings in general all of a sudden in this program.
Sleep is for the WEAK! 
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I fixed it by using #undef's on GetObject and MessageBox. But now GetObject won't grab the icon file I need it to grab.
this->Icon = (__try_cast<System::Drawing::Icon * >(resources->GetObject(S"app.ico")));
I tried grabbing it by file using System::Drawing::Image::FromFile and then casting it into an icon, but that didn't work either. Does anyone know a way to grab the .ico from the file? I'll just keep it in the same folder as the .exe. Thanks in advance.
Sleep is for the WEAK!
|
|
|
|
|
If you hover your mouse over GetObject befure you UNDEF it, you can right click and go to the macro definition. Copy that and write your own, but rename it. Then you can use that.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
|
|
|
|
|
Do something like this :-
#pragma push_macro("MessageBox")
#undef MessageBox
MessageBox::Show(...);
#pragma pop_macro("MessageBox")
Nish
|
|
|
|
|
How can i make a variable volatile in c or c++ without actually qualifying it using the keyword volatile..
:->
|
|
|
|
|
i think (but not sure) that there may be a compiler command-line parameter for such an optimisation, but i doubt if any command exist that you could limit the compiler optimisation to only one variable...
to sum up, this is almost sure that it is not possible...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
Ok... but the problem is that i was asked this question in an interview... and the interviewer was quite sure its possible....
but i have no idea how.
|
|
|
|
|
Pegasus Kiddo wrote: #define vfor volatile
vfor variable;
#define vfor volatile
vfor variable;
I think this will do
regards
|
|
|
|
|
but that DOES use the volatile keyword, which Pegasus Kiddo don't want to...
hidding a word with another doesn't mean it is not used anymore... the compiler will see volatile as if it would have been written by the developer.
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
ok, let's sum up.
what volatile is suposed to do ?
it is there to tell the compiler not to perform optimisations on the code it will generate because the variable marked as volatile may be modified from outside the process.
from the MSDN :
"Objects declared as volatile are not used in optimizations because their value can change at any time. The system always reads the current value of a volatile object at the point it is requested, even if the previous instruction asked for a value from the same object. Also, the value of the object is written immediately on assignment.
One use of the volatile qualifier is to provide access to memory locations used by asynchronous processes such as interrupt handlers."
do you see any point in the C++ language that allow you to perform such an action rounding over the volatile keyword ? no.
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
-- modified at 8:09 Tuesday 29th November, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
toxcct wrote: do you see any point in the C++ language that allow you to perform such an action rounding over the volatile keyword ? no.
Actually yes. When you use a thread and you're sharing a variable, for instance.
class A
{
static bool bFlag;
void MethodA()
{
AfxBeginThread(&methodB,...);
Thread.Sleep(1000);
bFlag = false;
}
static UINT MethodB(LPVOID param)
{
while (!bflag)
{
...
}
}
}
might not work as expected, because the compiler can optimize away the while loop condition. The volatile keyword prevents that from happening.
Regards
Senthil
_____________________________
My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose if you pass a variable by adress/reference to another function (outside the current compilation unit/module), the compiler is forced not to assume any optimization techniques regarding the variables value... Just an idea. 
--
Pictures[^] from my Japan trip.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have an MFC application which talks to a DLL which talks to driver to send/receive data from a device.
When I send a command using the dllexport functions, I need the dllexport function to wait for a flag which will be set by the WndProc-OnDeviceChange function and dllexport funtion should return with some data which will be available after the flag is set.
I used a while loop in the dllexport functions checking for the flag and was setting the flag in WndProc assuming that the dllexport function and WndProc runs on different threads.
But this is not working. The application hangs.
Can you please suggest me another mechanism/logic to do this ?
- KK
|
|
|
|
|
 When different threads r running and accessing a flag may cause collision.
You can use interlockedincrement or semaphore synchronization.
regards
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
