|
Apologies in advance if this isn't the correct forum to post this.
I attempted to create an account yesterday (Sept 22nd) which appears to be in some state of limbo. I never recieved an confirmation e-mail saying the account was created, yet any attempts to create a newer account using the same username/e-mail generates the "...the name/e-mail is already being used by someone else" error. I'm unable to login using the password I provided, and I never recieve any e-mails from the "I forgot my password" page.
I created another account today so I could post this message. Initially I provided a name, But when I went back to edit my account, the "Name" field was blank. I didn't think anything of it until I tried to post. When I tried to submit a post, the site would come back with an error saying my login name (blank) and the name field on the "New Message" page ("mzuber") had to match. So, I removed the name I provided and resubmitted. The site then complains that blank values are not accepted!
Aaarrrrrggh!
So, in the end I resorted to using an account from www.bugmenot.com in order to post. Now that I have a "voice", is there an administrator I can e-mail to delete those two accounts?
Thanks in advance,
-Me
-- modified at 11:32 Friday 23rd September, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
During the period of registration, was your Inbox free to recieve messages? May be any spamfilter is blocking the messages.
While posting and recieving in this thread, are you getting replies from forums@codeproject.com. If not, I think you need to check out whether your mailserver is blocking mails from CP.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Web: http://www.lavanyadeepak.tk/
I Blog At: http://deepak.blogdrive.com/
|
|
|
|
|
A "Looking for ..." forum. For those who are looking for a software component or the like. It kind of sits somewhere in between programming question and general information.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I like that idea.
Don't try it, just do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funny you should say this, I posted this before but to also include hardware etc. It's a really good thing to have in my completely un-humble opinion. I don't know why anyone would vote this suggestion down.
"A preoccupation with the next world pretty clearly signals an inability to cope credibly with this one."
|
|
|
|
|
John Cardinal wrote:
t's a really good thing to have in my completely un-humble opinion. I don't know why anyone would vote this suggestion down.
Well I voted the idea down because I think 'General Discussions' covers the topic quiet well. The more forums that are added, the more the valuable discussion is diluted.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote:
Well I voted the idea down because I think 'General Discussions' covers the topic quiet well. The more forums that are added, the more the valuable discussion is diluted.
If you had voted it down then you should have left a reason behind why you did that. 
-prakash
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.Prakash wrote:
If you had voted it down then you should have left a reason behind why you did that.
I did try... but one too many error messages made me give up trying.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote:
I did try... but one too many error messages made me give up trying.
I will give you 3 for trying
-prakash
|
|
|
|
|
this bug happens my guess about 50% of the time
I like to use the view option = thread view to skip past threads I'm not interested in
and then if thread I'm following has new post I clik to see first post in thread, then shift-clik to get new window with all messages for that thread
sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn't
when it doesn't, it only shows the last few posts to the thread & clik first/prev has no effect
kind of irritating because it forces me to use view option = message view & scroll thru page after page of stuff to get to thread I want to follow
|
|
|
|
|
This is a known bug - thanks!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
how about adding some kind of option to sort the forums by most recent post ?
currently thread titles always appear in time post order, and a popular thread can get submerged by lots of useless chatter
I've seen forums where posting reply to thread pops that thread to top of list
|
|
|
|
|
this doesn't mean anything... answers are to a specific quiestion/post, so reorder them just by time would not allow to see to whome the answer is for anymore...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
You're misunderstanding. Posts would stil be kept in threads, but the threads would be sorted by the timestamp on the most recent post, instead of the ts on the first post in the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
my answer remains the same...
even if you reorder only inside a thread, the answers don't stay associated to a question...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
Mmmh, I think you still didn't get it. The thing was to keep the complete threads as they are now but instead of sorting them by the time of their first post, they will be sorted by the time of the most recent post.
So it is like now except that if you add a message to a thread that is for example in the third position, the complete thread will come in the first position.
Is it clearer ? Or I can also translate in French
|
|
|
|
|
no need to translate cedric, it ok now... i understand the point...
well, why not, that could become a useful feature if we still can use the "sort by date of the first post"...
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
Please make sure EVERY article has a license attached to the source code, the way it is now is a total mess 
I'd like to use one code snippet in a commercial project, as an utility class, but I just have no idea of the license. (Yes, I did read the FAQ, etc, but it's still messy and unclear.)
Thank you!
John42
|
|
|
|
|
Why can't you ask the author?
Some people don't attach a license to their code, because they want to know who uses it for what. Every article has a forum in which you can post your request, the author will receive a noticifation and (usually) answer soon enough.
_________________________________
Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!
|
|
|
|
|
You must be joking. This site is visited by thousands of people, of even much much more. I don't think any author (of a more famous snippet) would be happy replying all day to license requests. Besides, what happens if you find a code snippet, but the author doesn't reply for a week or more, but you need that snippet NOW in your work/hobby project.
To the problem of "who uses it for what", well, a license could say that the one who takes the snippet has to NOTIFY the author by email of including the snippet in their project.
Though I have a feeling many people are ripping code from this side and not even caring of the license, just cut&pasting.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I read that the default CP licence was free for reuse anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, maybe not exactly, from the FAQ:
# Can I use code snippets and programs in my own work?
You can use code snippets and source code downloads in your applications as long as
* You keep all copyright notices in the code intact.
* You do not sell or repulish the code or it's associated article without the author's written agreement
* You agree the code is provided as-is without any implied or express warranty.
Some authors may also have specific restrictions on using code in commercial apps such as providing credit in documentation or sending them an email first.
It's still not clear to me, whether the "do not sell the code" means "do not sell your program including the downloaded code snippet" or just "do not sell the code snippet by itself". Additionally, no license is mentioned in any of the code snippet's headers.
|
|
|
|
|
akhilkh@hotmail.com wrote:
You can use code snippets and source code downloads in your applications as long as
* You keep all copyright notices in the code intact
That sentence is the answer.
If there are no copyright/license notices, you may use the snippets.
akhilkh@hotmail.com wrote:
You do not sell [...] the code [...] without the author's written agreement
If you're not sure whether or not to sell the compiled code, just don't do it.
The author could have included a license notice, and if he/she didn't include it, he/she wants to be asked (no matter how many mails per week it means).
_________________________________
Please inform me about my English mistakes, as I'm still trying to learn your language!
|
|
|
|
|
I am referring to the "email" link you see at the bottom of this message and all others which allows you to email directly to a person rather than replying in public.
I'm getting very tired of people clicking on the direct "EMAIL" link instead of asking their question in an article forum where it can benefit others. 9 times out of 10 now when I get an email from someone about an article or in reply to a posting in an article message board it's a direct email.
I used to be confused as to how they could do that because I would follow the link back from the email I got but wouldn't see their message posted until I realized that quite stupidly CP allows a person to just email right off the post directly.
This completely defeats one of the main strengths of having a public discussion in each articles message board.
I also do not want anyone emailing me directly, I'm not a help service, I'm a professional with very little spare time on my hands, I am happy to post a reply to someone in a public forum that will benefit others, but I most certainly am NOT happy helping people one on one.
Why is CP shooting itself in the foot with this feature? And more importantly when will it be removed, immediately would be a fine for me!
"A preoccupation with the next world pretty clearly signals an inability to cope credibly with this one."
-- modified at 11:24 Wednesday 21st September, 2005
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
