|
well.. i hardly can believe this (this problem is hanging around in my head since three month..)
it is not an a+ project..
AND NOW IT FINALLY WORKS.. THANK YOU !
really great...
bernhard
Sometimes I think the surest sign for intelligent life elsewhere in
the universe is that none of them ever tried to contact us.
|
|
|
|
|
enclosed an article of Microsoft, source of this statement:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q240015
Krz
FIX: getline Template Function Reads Extra Character (Q240015)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this article applies to:
The Standard C++ Library, used with:
Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Enterprise Edition, version 6.0
Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Professional Edition, version 6.0
Microsoft Visual C++, 32-bit Learning Edition, version 6.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SYMPTOMS
The Standard C++ Library template getline function reads an extra character after encountering the delimiter. Please refer to the sample program in the More Information section for details.
RESOLUTION
Modify the getline member function, which can be found in the following system header file string, as follows:
else if (_Tr::eq((_E)_C, _D))
{_Chg = true;
// _I.rdbuf()->snextc(); /* Remove this line and add the line below.*/
_I.rdbuf()->sbumpc();
break; }
NOTE : Because the resolution involves modifying a system header file, extreme care should be taken to ensure that nothing else is changed in the header file. Microsoft is not responsible for any problems resulting from unwanted changes to the system header files.
STATUS
Microsoft has confirmed this to be a bug in the Microsoft products listed at the beginning of this article.
This problem was corrected in Microsoft Visual C++ .NET.
MORE INFORMATION
The following sample program demonstrates the bug:
//test.cpp
//Compiler options : /GX
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
int main () {
std::string s,s2;
std::getline(std::cin,s);
std::getline(std::cin,s2);
std::cout << s <<'\t'<< s2 << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Actual Results:
Hello<enter key="">
World<enter key="">
<enter key="">
Hello World
Expected Results:
Hello<enter key="">
World<enter key="">
Hello World
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published Sep 16 1999 12:33PM Issue Type kbbug
Last Modifed Feb 11 2002 7:06PM Additional Query Words STL
Keywords kbtemplate kbLangCPP kbSTL kbVC kbVC600 kbVC600bug kbNoUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All,
How do I create a color ramp from two ranges of colors? some of 2 by 2 matrix. Anyone with a suitable algorithm?
Best regards,
Paul.
Paul Selormey, Bsc (Elect Eng), MSc (Mobile Communication) is currently Windows open source developer in Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
A 2x2 matrix requires you decide to ignore red, green or blue. Better you convert to HLS and then ignore one of those. Anyhow, once you decide which value to keep constant, just build a range between the two value sets you want to work with.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Best regards,
Paul.
Paul Selormey, Bsc (Elect Eng), MSc (Mobile Communication) is currently Windows open source developer in Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
My memory has failed me badly and the code from when I did this last time was lost in a major disaster.
If I have an Bitmap drawn on a MemDC what is the fast way to put it in a CBitmap object which is then to be added to a CImageList.
I have searched the site and not found the answer.
Happy programming!!
|
|
|
|
|
Build a BITMAP from CDC::GetCurrentBitmap, use that to create a new CBitmap, put it into a CDC and BitBlt. I think if you grab GetCurrentBitmap, you'll have troubles as the DC owns it.
Christian
The tragedy of cyberspace - that so much can travel so far, and yet mean so little.
|
|
|
|
|
If you create a simple microsoft Win32 DLL function, it creates an entry point file plus the stdafx files which contain the windows.h include file.
However, if you start adding header and cpp files which make reference to stuff like CRecordSet and have references to stuff like afxdb, then Windows.h and afxdb.h get in one another's way.
Then, if you comment out the windows.h and use afxdb.h, you get an error as following:
Linking...
nafxcwd.lib(dllmodul.obj) : error LNK2005: _DllMain@12 already defined in test2.obj
Debug/test2.dll : fatal error LNK1169: one or more multiply defined symbols found
Error executing link.exe.
And if you comment out the DLLMain at this point, everything compiles well.
Why does this happen? Can I not have a DLL with a DLLMain which also uses afxdb.h? How do I go about fixing this problem?
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
First, remove the windows.h include, and change it to afxwin.h.
Second, regular MFC DLLs are made completely differently from plain Win32 DLLs. You need a global CWinApp object, and MFC provides the DllMain().
--Mike--
Fetchez la vache!
My really out-of-date homepage
Sonork - 100.10414 AcidHelm
Big fan of Alyson Hannigan and Jamie Salé.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm.
Look at this code snippet :-
STDMETHODIMP CNishFirst::GetArray(BSTR **pbstrArray)
{
// TODO: Add your implementation code here
USES_CONVERSION;
BSTR *tmpArray[25];
for(int i=0;i<25;i++)
*tmpArray[i]=SysAllocString(A2W("Nish Test"));
*pbstrArray=*tmpArray;
return S_OK;
}
You'd think it was fine [ignoring that amazing warning I got which I had reported in the previous thread]
But when I tried to test the function using VB I got an error saying that I was attempting to use an OLE Automation feature not supported by VB! 
Nish
My most recent CP article :-
A newbie's elementary guide to spawning processes
www.busterboy.org
|
|
|
|
|
Aaah, you're going to love this, Nish.
To pass arrays in Automation, you're going to have to use the dreaded... SAFEARRAY. The old C-style array is not supported. Have fun with SAFEARRAY (I know I do!)
------------------------
Derek Waters
derek@lj-oz.com
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Waters wrote:
Aaah, you're going to love this, Nish.
I hope so too
Derek Waters wrote:
To pass arrays in Automation, you're going to have to use the dreaded... SAFEARRAY. The old C-style array is not supported. Have fun with SAFEARRAY (I know I do!)
Hmmm. Safe Arrays!!!
Nish
p.s. This ATL stuff is deeper than I imagined even though I had imagined it to be pretty deep, so you can guess how deep it really is.
My most recent CP article :-
A newbie's elementary guide to spawning processes
www.busterboy.org
|
|
|
|
|
interface INishFirst : IDispatch
{
[id(1), helpstring("method GetString")] HRESULT GetString([in] BSTR* pbstrInString, [out,retval] BSTR* pbstrOutString);
[id(2), helpstring("method GetArray")] HRESULT GetArray([out,retval] BSTR** pbstrArray);
};
It's showing an error :-
warning MIDL2039 : interface does not conform to [oleautomation] attribute : [ Parameter 'pbstrArray' of Procedure 'GetArray' ( Interface 'INishFirst' ) ]
Am I not allowed to have BSTR **s????
My most recent CP article :-
A newbie's elementary guide to spawning processes
www.busterboy.org
|
|
|
|
|
BSTR is already a pointer. So BSTR** is a "triple pointer" (omg!  ), which of course is not supported by automation.
From MSDN:
typedef OLECHAR FAR* BSTR;
|
|
|
|
|
You can have BSTR **, so long as you don't want your COM object to be Automation-compatible (ie usable in ASP). The Automation type standard is quite strict on this sort of thing.
------------------------
Derek Waters
derek@lj-oz.com
|
|
|
|
|
I might want to add:
- use BSTR for your [in] param
- use BSTR* for your [out] param
Edit: fixed the little bug in my 2nd statement 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Waters wrote:
You can have BSTR **, so long as you don't want your COM object to be Automation-compatible (ie usable in ASP). The Automation type standard is quite strict on this sort of thing.
Thanks again Derek. I jus found that out 
Nish
My most recent CP article :-
A newbie's elementary guide to spawning processes
www.busterboy.org
|
|
|
|
|
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote:
I was just advised to use BSTR* as my out parameters
I meant to say that actually, must be smoking crack...
Sorry for the confusion
|
|
|
|
|
Just some more information...
The OLE Automation restriction is there for a reason. The idea is that if an interface supports OLE automation no external proxy code is required to marshal the calls.
I leave it to the reader to translated what I just said into English. I know for the longest time I had NO CLUE what any of that ment. (Heh, and I hope I got the statement right.)
Tim Smith
I know what you're thinking punk, you're thinking did he spell check this document? Well, to tell you the truth I kinda forgot myself in all this excitement. But being this here's CodeProject, the most powerful forums in the world and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nish,It's also nice to use _bstr_t,it encapsulate the BSTR
data type.It manages resource allocation and deallocation through internall calls
to SysAllocString() and SysFreeeStrnig so you don't have to add
these function to your code.It provides a number of operators that enable you to use a
_bstr_t object as easily as you would use a CString.But one thing
that isn't provide,is the & "address of" operator,so can't pass the address of
a _bstr_t to a function that expects a BSTR *.
Hope that helps.
Mazy
"So,so you think you can tell,
Heaven from Hell,
Blue skies from pain,...
How I wish,how I wish you were here."
Wish You Were Here-Pink Floyd-1975
|
|
|
|
|
I am writing codes to put a view in a dialog.
Here are the code to initialize the view in a dialog:
BOOL CMyDialog::OnInitDialog()
{
CDialog::OnInitDialog();
CCreateContext pContext;
CWnd* pFrameWnd = this;
pContext.m_pCurrentDoc = new CMyDoc();
pContext.m_pNewViewClass = RUNTIME_CLASS(CMyView);
CMyView *pView = (CMyView *) ((CFrameWnd*)pFrameWnd)->CreateView(&pContext);
ASSERT(pView);
pView->ShowWindow(SW_NORMAL);
CRect rectWindow;
GetWindowRect(rectWindow);
ScreenToClient(rectWindow);
rectWindow.right += 15;
rectWindow.top -= 10;
pView->MoveWindow(rectWindow);
return TRUE;
}
I got two problems:
(1) If the CMyView is kind of CHtmlView and if the dialog is displayed within an MFC MDI application, when I clicked the view right after the view is displayed, I got an ASSERT in CView::OnMouseActivate(..). But if the dialog is the main window of a dialog-based MFC app, it works fine. Why?
(2) I use the following code to detect if there is memory leak:
void CMyDlgView::OnViewViewInDialog()
{
#ifdef _DEBUG
CMemoryState oldMemState, newMemState, diffMemState;
oldMemState.Checkpoint();
#endif
ShowDialog();
#ifdef _DEBUG
newMemState.Checkpoint();
if( diffMemState.Difference( oldMemState, newMemState ) )
{
TRACE( "Memory leaked!\n" );
}
#endif
}
void CMyDlgView::ShowDialog()
{
CMyDialog dlg;
dlg.DoModal();
}
if it is a CHtmlView derived view, there is memork leak; however if it is a generic CView derived view, no memory leak. Why?
|
|
|
|
|
It is this that got me thinking:
((CFrameWnd*)pFrameWnd)->CreateView(...) If I'm understading your code, pFrameWnd is a CDialog and not a CFrameWnd. My guess it that this works (when it does) due to pure chance, and it's no wonder weird things happen afterward. Maybe you can take a look at the source code of CFrameWnd::CreateView to try to determine what's going wrong.
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
|
|
|
|
|
I have tried other method to create a view using something like:
CView *pView = pRuntimeClass->CreateObject();
pView->Create(...);
It got the same assert. However if I add (Overide) a message handler of OnMouseActive(..)of CMyView and just call CWnd::OnMouseActivate(..) within that handler, the ASSERT goes away. Odd!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
